ChaseDream
搜索
1234下一页
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Journalist: In physics journals, the number of articles reporting the results of experiments involving particle accelerators was lower last year than it had been in previous years. Several of the particle accelerators at major research institutions were out of service the year before last for repairs, so it is likely that the low number of articles was due to the decline in availability of particle accelerators.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the journalist's argument?

正确答案: E

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 11579|回复: 31
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG-203. try try

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2003-7-19 22:33:00 | 只看该作者

OG-203. try try

203.
Journalist: In physics journals, the number of articles reporting the results of experiments involving particle accelerators was lower last year than it had
been in previous years. Several of the particle accelerators at major research institutions were out of service the year before last for repairs, so it is likely
that the low number of articles was due to the decline in availability of
particle accelerators.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the journalist’s argument?
(A) Every article based on experiments with particle accelerators that
was submitted for publication last year actually was published.
(B) The average time scientists must wait for access to a
particle accelerator has declined over the last several years.
(C) The number of physics journals was the same last year
as in previous years.
(D) Particle accelerators can be used for more than one
group of experiments in any given year.
(E) Recent changes in the editorial policies of several physics
journals have decreased the likelihood that articles concerning
particle-accelerator research will be accepted for publication.



沙发
发表于 2003-7-19 22:46:00 | 只看该作者
我选E.
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2003-7-19 23:05:00 | 只看该作者
请教:
the number of articles reporting the results of experiments involving particle accelerators was lower last year than it had been in previous years.这句话,是不是在说:
发表在去年的文章(关于particle的)少。

If yes, then
    那和e中的recent有关系么?recent是去年么?
else
    是什么意思呢?
endif
thanks!
地板
发表于 2003-7-19 23:06:00 | 只看该作者
同意
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2003-7-19 23:56:00 | 只看该作者
同意什么?
6#
发表于 2003-7-20 02:18:00 | 只看该作者
I thought about "recent" when I picked E. But as I eliminated all other choices, E was the only one possible to me.

I think there is not determined meaning of "recent". what it means depends on the context and time frame. If we are talking about events in the last two months, recent more likely refers to events in the past few days. If about past two decades, it might refers to past few years.
7#
发表于 2003-7-21 01:13:00 | 只看该作者
我觉得这题首先要明确题型。
如果熟悉CXD的分类的话,很快就知道是一个现象推出一个结论。
这种题型的驳斥方向就是:找到另一个解释。
直接看答案,只有E选项是为现象提供了解释的
8#
发表于 2003-7-22 23:17:00 | 只看该作者
同一楼上的

只有E给了另外一种解释
9#
发表于 2004-12-11 07:26:00 | 只看该作者
Great example!
10#
发表于 2005-3-6 19:31:00 | 只看该作者

我想不通B为什么不能削弱.

等候时间少了,就提高了机器使用率,换句话说就提高了论文的数量.如果使用率提高导致论文增加的数量大于机器停用减少的论文数量,结果说明实际论文的产量还是提高了,但最后发表的少了,说明是有他因在影响发表论文数量.

请问哪位能说一下我的推理哪里有问题?我觉得这个选项一样也在削弱,但ETS说是在增强.我无非感觉这个削弱没有象E指出他因那样直接...所以从priority来说还是E好.

请赐教!

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-19 21:26
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部