- UID
- 538
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2003-3-13
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
This is an interesting question. Let's go further discussing:
菩提老祖's conclusion:那个叫紫霞的一定欠你更多钱
菩提老祖's evidence: 1)你刚才在睡梦中呼唤着晶晶的名字20遍
2)但是你叫紫霞这个名字765遍
Assumption is a bridge between the "conclusion" and "evidence" ; that is, only if the assumption is true, we will properly draw the conclusion from the provided evidence.
It is easy to eliminate the chioce A, B and D in this question.
Let's check the left chioces:
F. 从脑细胞的结构可以推出，很少梦话的人在说梦话的时候一定是和别人欠他钱有关，而且钱的数量同proportion to名字的数量.
Besides unreasonably generalizing "菩提老祖's conclusion", chioce D is at fault in stating that "很少梦话的人.......". We cannot find any clues whether "至尊宝说梦话" in his daily dream. If 至尊宝 is a real daily 说梦话 person, how can this choice establish the connection between the " conlusion" and "evidence".
C. 至尊宝不是因为更喜欢紫霞，才在梦中叫她更多遍.
Chioce C rules out another possibility of the reason that 至尊宝在梦中叫紫霞更多遍, but it does not rules out all other possible reasons, such as that 至尊宝更 hates 紫霞 rather than 紫霞的一定欠更多钱 . The point is, even though chioce C is true, we still cannot properly get any relativity between the conclusion and the two evidences, or we still don't know the relationship between 欠钱 and 梦话. Chioce C, however, supports the conclution somewhat, and if we are looking for the supporting answer, it is the right one.
E. 至尊宝从来不说梦话，除非有人欠他钱
Although not perfect, chioce E makes sense here by using "至尊宝从来不说梦话" , instead of "很少梦话的人在说梦话的时候..." , and indicates that "有人欠他钱" is the only reason for 至尊宝 to 说梦话, establishing a bridge between 欠钱 and 至尊宝说梦话. Assumption does not must be sufficient to how the conclusion can be drawn from evidences, but it must be necessary.
welcome to dispute my view. |
|
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2003-6-18 23:47:00
楼主