请教OG－65

birdie · 发表于 2003-6-17 14:01:00

请教OG-65

65. Correctly measuring the productivity of service workers is complex. Consider, for example,postal workers: they are often said to be more productive if more letters are delivered per postal worker. But is this really true? what if more letters are lost or delayed per worker at the same time that more are delivered?
The objection implied above to the productivity measure described is based on doubts about the truth of which of the following statements?
(A) Postal workers are representative of service workers in general.
(B) The delivery of letters is the primary activity of the postal service.
(C) Productivity should be ascribed to categories of workers, not to individuals.
(D) The quality of services rendered can appropriately be ignored in computing productivity.
(E) The number of letters delivered is relevant to measuring the productivity of postal
workers.

我的答案：E 正确答案：D

我对题目的理解：
论点：正确衡量一个service worker的prodectivity是很complex的
论据：postal worker

我对答案的理解：
因为上文最后一句是对仅仅通过投递信件的数量来衡量productivity表示怀疑，认为因该通过对投递信件在全部信件中所占的比例来衡量。所以选E

问题：
1.此类“based on doubts”问题代表归纳题还是削弱题？
2.OG对正确答案的解释：The critique of the proposed purely quantitative measure of productivity raises the issue of quality of service, which implies that quality of service is a potentially relevant consideration. Thus, choice D is the best answer.不能理解既然quality of service是跟这个consideration有potential关系，为什么答案D中quality of service可以被ignore还是正确的？

linlin315 · 发表于 2003-6-17 14:39:00

birdie,我认为你的题没读明白！！
题问的是文中的陈述是基于对下面那一个陈述的怀疑
文中的意思是计算生产率不能只看数量还要看质量不刚好是对D质量可以被忽略的怀疑吗？？？

homosexual · 发表于 2004-7-7 14:45:00

阅读实在太重要了！！

楼主的意群划分错误。

skidals · 发表于 2004-11-11 00:15:00

偶的问题是这道题应该属于那种题型？

是假设题吗？还是归纳？

lawyer_1 · 发表于 2004-11-11 06:23:00

你可以将它当作REASONING TECHNIQUE，即反对者如何反对原文所描述的测量生产率的方法。

skidals · 发表于 2004-11-11 08:55:00

谢谢！

fychen66 · 发表于 2005-6-4 22:05:00

这题好难啊！问题就读不懂！更别说解题了！做了一点信心都没了！唉！还有两个月就要考试了！怎么办啊！

逻辑似乎只要阅读过关了，基本上都能做得出，可是阅读可是最难的啊！。。。。

youarewordy · 发表于 2005-6-5 06:01:00

以下是引用fychen66在2005-6-4 22:05:00的发言：

这题好难啊！问题就读不懂！更别说解题了！做了一点信心都没了！唉！还有两个月就要考试了！怎么办啊！

逻辑似乎只要阅读过关了，基本上都能做得出，可是阅读可是最难的啊！。。。。

两个月还是可以做很多事的,楼上静下心来提高阅读基本功,会有收获的.

lfeng08908 · 发表于 2005-6-17 13:15:00

is based on doubts about the truth of相当于is based on the questionable claim of

GO ON.

透明萝卜 · 发表于 2005-6-22 19:23:00

The quality of services rendered can appropriately be ignored in computing productivity.

怎么翻译，尤其是rendered

本贴相关题目 OG-12-CR-110 | GMATPrep-2012-CR-55 (BZZA)

相关帖子

更多相关帖子

请教OG－65

请教OG－65

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()