ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Environmental organizations want to preserve the land surrounding the Wilgrinn Wilderness Area from residential development. They plan to do this by purchasing that land from the farmers who own it. That plan is ill-conceived: if the farmers did sell their land, they would sell it to the highest bidder, and developers would outbid any other bidders. On the other hand, these farmers will never actually sell any of the land, provided that farming it remains viable. But farming will not remain viable if the farms are left unmodernized, and most of the farmers lack the financial resources modernization requires. And that is exactly why a more sensible preservation strategy would be to assist the farmers to modernize their farms to the extent needed to maintain viability.

In the argument as a whole, the two boldface proportions play which of the following roles?

正确答案: D

相关帖子

更多...

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2234|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD一道BF题球刺叫!!!

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-11-22 17:28:15 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Environmental organizations want to preserve the land surrounding the Wilgrinn Wilderness Area from residential development.They plan to do this by purchasing that land from the farmers who own it.That plan is ill-conceived:if the farmers did sell their land, they would sell it to the highest bidder, and developers would outbid any other bidders.On the other hand, these farmers will never actually sell any of the land, provided that farming it remains viable.But farming will not remain viable if the farms are left unmodernized, and most of the farmers lack the financial resources modernization requires.And that is exactly why a more sensible preservation strategy would be to assist the farmers to modernize their farms to the extent needed to maintain viability.


  1. In the argument as a whole, the two boldface proportions play which of the following roles?


    1. The first presents a goal that the argument rejects as ill-conceived; the second is evidence that is presented as grounds for that rejection.
    2. The first presents a goal that the argument concludes cannot be attained; the second is a reason offered in support of that conclusion.
    3. The first presents a goal that the argument concludes can be attained; the second is a judgment disputing that conclusion.
    4. The first presents a goal, strategies for achieving which are being evaluated in the argument; the second is a judgment providing a basis for the argument’s advocacy of a particular strategy.
    5. The first presents a goal that the argument endorses; the second presents a situation that the argument contends must be changed if that goal is to be met in the foreseeable future.


      KEY: D
      想不明白为什么是advocacy 呢?农民不卖土地,这个原来的strategy 不就行不通么?
      等等,是不是那个particular strategy 指的是后来那个more sensible strategy 啊?!顺便问问B怎么不可以呢?

      感谢大虾不吝赐教啊~




  1. In the argument as a whole, the two boldface proportions play which of the following roles?


    1. The first presents a goal that the argument rejects as ill-conceived; the second is evidence that is presented as grounds for that rejection.
    2. The first presents a goal that the argument concludes cannot be attained; the second is a reason offered in support of that conclusion.
    3. The first presents a goal that the argument concludes can be attained; the second is a judgment disputing that conclusion.
    4. The first presents a goal, strategies for achieving which are being evaluated in the argument; the second is a judgment providing a basis for the argument’s advocacy of a particular strategy.
    5. The first presents a goal that the argument endorses; the second presents a situation that the argument contends must be changed if that goal is to be met in the foreseeable future.


      KEY: D
      想不明白为什么是advocacy 呢?农民不卖土地,这个原来的strategy 不就行不通么?
      等等,是不是那个particular strategy 指的是后来那个more sensible strategy 啊?!顺便问问B怎么不可以呢?

      感谢大虾不吝赐教啊~

收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2012-11-22 20:26:10 | 只看该作者
我是这样理解的,第一句话说政府想要保护土地。紧接着文中提出,第一种方案即购买土地不合理。然后说,由于农民在土地可以耕种的情况下是不会卖出土地的,而现在是因为缺少资金技术等支持不能使土地 farming visible. 然后最后一句说支持农民是最好的方式。   文中都是围绕第一句话说的,即提出结论,然后分析其中一种方式的缺陷再提出另一种较好的达到目的的方法。
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2012-11-22 21:59:50 | 只看该作者
啊哈~我明白了~方案一说高价买地,但怎么也争不过开发商,所以不行;另外,如果农民不卖地,就是从源头解决,所以关键就是使农民现代化就可以保证农民不卖地,从而达到保护的目的~
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-25 19:05
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部