GWD一道BF题球刺叫！！！

sicilia小山

Environmental organizations want to preserve the land surrounding the Wilgrinn Wilderness Area from residential development.They plan to do this by purchasing that land from the farmers who own it.That plan is ill-conceived:if the farmers did sell their land, they would sell it to the highest bidder, and developers would outbid any other bidders.On the other hand, these farmers will never actually sell any of the land, provided that farming it remains viable.But farming will not remain viable if the farms are left unmodernized, and most of the farmers lack the financial resources modernization requires.And that is exactly why a more sensible preservation strategy would be to assist the farmers to modernize their farms to the extent needed to maintain viability.

1. 
   
   In the argument as a whole, the two boldface proportions play which of the following roles?
   
   
   
   1. The first presents a goal that the argument rejects as ill-conceived; the second is evidence that is presented as grounds for that rejection.
      
   2. The first presents a goal that the argument concludes cannot be attained; the second is a reason offered in support of that conclusion.
      
   3. The first presents a goal that the argument concludes can be attained; the second is a judgment disputing that conclusion.
      
   4. The first presents a goal, strategies for achieving which are being evaluated in the argument; the second is a judgment providing a basis for the argument’s advocacy of a particular strategy.
      
   5. The first presents a goal that the argument endorses; the second presents a situation that the argument contends must be changed if that goal is to be met in the foreseeable future.
      
      
      KEY: D
      想不明白为什么是advocacy 呢？农民不卖土地，这个原来的strategy 不就行不通么？
      等等，是不是那个particular strategy 指的是后来那个more sensible strategy 啊？！顺便问问B怎么不可以呢？
      
      感谢大虾不吝赐教啊～
      
   
   

1. 
   
   In the argument as a whole, the two boldface proportions play which of the following roles?
   
   
   
   1. The first presents a goal that the argument rejects as ill-conceived; the second is evidence that is presented as grounds for that rejection.
      
   2. The first presents a goal that the argument concludes cannot be attained; the second is a reason offered in support of that conclusion.
      
   3. The first presents a goal that the argument concludes can be attained; the second is a judgment disputing that conclusion.
      
   4. The first presents a goal, strategies for achieving which are being evaluated in the argument; the second is a judgment providing a basis for the argument’s advocacy of a particular strategy.
      
   5. The first presents a goal that the argument endorses; the second presents a situation that the argument contends must be changed if that goal is to be met in the foreseeable future.
      
      
      KEY: D
      想不明白为什么是advocacy 呢？农民不卖土地，这个原来的strategy 不就行不通么？
      等等，是不是那个particular strategy 指的是后来那个more sensible strategy 啊？！顺便问问B怎么不可以呢？
      
      感谢大虾不吝赐教啊～
      
   
   

guotonghao123

我是这样理解的，第一句话说政府想要保护土地。紧接着文中提出，第一种方案即购买土地不合理。然后说，由于农民在土地可以耕种的情况下是不会卖出土地的，而现在是因为缺少资金技术等支持不能使土地 farming visible. 然后最后一句说支持农民是最好的方式。   文中都是围绕第一句话说的，即提出结论，然后分析其中一种方式的缺陷再提出另一种较好的达到目的的方法。

sicilia小山

啊哈～我明白了～方案一说高价买地，但怎么也争不过开发商，所以不行；另外，如果农民不卖地，就是从源头解决，所以关键就是使农民现代化就可以保证农民不卖地，从而达到保护的目的～