ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 34161|回复: 69
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD-9-40

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-7-19 10:25:00 | 只看该作者

GWD-9-40

  






Q40:



Agricultural societies cannot exist without staple crops.  Several food plants, such as kola and okra, are known to have been domesticated in western Africa, but they are all supplemental, not staple, foods.  All the recorded staple crops grown in western Africa were introduced from elsewhere, beginning, at some unknown date, with rice and yams.  Therefore, discovering when rice and yams were introduced into western Africa would establish the earliest date at which agricultural societies could have arisen there.



Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?









A.   eople in western Africa did not develop staple crops that they stopped cultivatin g










once rice and yams were introduced.  










B.  There are no plants native to western Africa that, if domesticated, could serve as










staple food crops.










C.  Rice and yams were grown as staple crops by the earliest agricultural societies










outside of western Africa.










D.   Kola and okra are better suited to growing conditions in western Africa than










domesticated rice and yams are.










E.   Kola and okra were domesticated in western Africa before rice and yams were










introduced there.




    答案是A,我死活看不懂,哪位能帮忙解释一下



   我选B,我觉得题目只叙述了记录在案的情况,假设应把可能的情况排除掉
沙发
发表于 2004-7-19 12:56:00 | 只看该作者

This is an assumption question and you can use the so-called deny test, i.e., negate a choice, see whether the original argument will fall apart; if so, the choice is a necessary assumption of the argument.

The opposite of A is "People in western Africa did develop staple crops that they stopped cultivating once rice and yams were introduced."  If this is true, the conclusion "discovering when rice and yams were introduced into western Africa would establish the earliest date at which agricultural societies could have arisen there." will fall apart, because agricultural societies could have established before the introduction of rice and yams.  Therefore, A is a necessary assumption.

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2004-7-20 15:20:00 | 只看该作者
多谢楼上的,你说的方法我理解,就是狒狒的“取非”……但是能不能用中文说一下为什么A取非就会使 agricultural societies could have established before the introduction of rice and yams
地板
发表于 2004-7-30 23:35:00 | 只看该作者

The opposite of A is "People in western Africa did develop staple crops that they stopped cultivating once rice and yams were introduced."  If this is true, the conclusion "discovering when rice and yams were introduced into western Africa would establish the earliest date at which agricultural societies could have arisen there." will fall apart, because agricultural societies could have established before the introduction of rice and yams.  Therefore, A is a necessary assumption.

5#
发表于 2004-7-31 00:04:00 | 只看该作者
这道题目为什么B错?如果B取非,也可以使原论证不成立呀。
6#
发表于 2004-8-8 11:29:00 | 只看该作者
up一下,b的问题在哪里呢?
7#
发表于 2004-8-19 12:21:00 | 只看该作者
开始我选的是B,感觉这两个选项很难区分阿。
8#
发表于 2004-8-19 19:34:00 | 只看该作者
B 取非为There are some plants native to western Africa that, if domesticated, could serve as staple food crops


因为即使这样,你不知这些PLANTS domesticated是在rice and yams were introduced into western Africa 之前还是之后,如果之后,则结论仍能成立。即B取非不一定使结论不成立。而A取非是结论一定不成立

9#
发表于 2004-8-22 08:10:00 | 只看该作者

偶没看过费费.

但是我觉得"取非"并不一定对.

具体地说,那些非洲人在大米引进之前种另外一种staple corp X, 后来大米来了, 非洲人觉得大米比X好吃多了,不再中X了. 后来又过了几年,一种可能:非洲人又想吃X了,(跟我们前几年又喜欢吃窝头是的, ),又开始种X (A非); 另一种可能, 非洲人彻底忘本了,不再种X, (A),

但是不管那种可能也无法支持本题结论:引进大米的时候是农业社会的开始.

而B呢,如果根本没有任何staple corp, 甭管之前之后(如楼上说的), 不是可以得到结论吗?

10#
发表于 2004-9-18 09:00:00 | 只看该作者

选A.


B的问题是否定的是没有native, 万一以前在rice和yam引进以前存在其他引进staple crops,那么农业开始的日期也不是从rice和yam开始, 只有A彻底让你相信在rice和yam引进以前不存在其他staple crops.(偶的逻辑都是大白话)


[此贴子已经被作者于2004-9-18 9:03:23编辑过]
1234567下一页
返回列表 发新帖
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: GMAT考试


近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-24 00:28
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部