两道OG迷糊逻辑题og-168,og-195

195.

A proposed change to federal income tax laws would eliminate deductions from taxable

income for donations a taxpayer has made to charitable and educational institutions. If this

change were adopted, wealthy individuals would no longer be permitted such deductions.

Therefore, many charitable and educational institutions would have to reduce services, and

some would have to close their doors.

The argument above assumes which of the following?

(A) Without the incentives offered by federal income tax laws, at least some wealthy

individuals would not donate as much money to charitable and educational institutions as

they otherwise would have.

(B) Money contributed by individuals who make their donations because of provisions in the

federal tax laws provides the only source of funding for many charitable and educational

institutions.

(C) The primary reason for not adopting the proposed change in the federal income tax laws

cited above is to protect wealthy individuals from having to pay higher taxes.

(D) Wealthy individuals who donate money to charitable and educational institutions are the

only individuals who donate money to such institutions.

(E) Income tax laws should be changed to make donations to charitable and educational

institutions the only permissible deductions from taxable income.

如果还有其他捐，就不会关门

Premise: a proposal that  eliminate deductions from taxable income for donations a taxpayer has made to charitable and educational institutions.

A: wealthy individuals would no longer be permitted such deductions

B:  C and E I reduce services, and some would have to close their doors.

A--> B

to assumes, then not weaken.

if wealthy individuals would not reduce their donations, C and E I should not have to close.

A is correct.

Both B and D indicated the only source is wealthy individuals.

But if these people don't reduce donations, the C and E I also should not have to close.

The Key Point is reduce money, not source.

D indicated the avg rate of nonviolent crime.

Although this sentence is corrent, you can't compare the avg rate of noneviolent crime and the avg rate of crime.

Understand?