多重意外，一点遗憾。

albert

以下是引用linlin315在2003-7-30 23:44:00的发言：
3、United States automobile manufacturers have been steadily losing United States market share to foreign manufacturers. Now a study has found that advertisements for foreign automobiles hold United States consumers' attention better than advertisements for domestically made automobiles do. Therefore, United States automobile manufacturers will increase market share by giving top priority to revamping their advertising campaigns.
which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
a. People who are considering buying a new automobile pay more attention to advertisement for automobiles than do people who are not planning to buy an automobile in the near future.
b. Consumers tend to pay closer attention to advertisements for products they already prefer than to advertisements for other products.
c. United States manufacturers of automobiles currently spend about as much on adveritising each of their new models as foreign automobile manufacturers do
d. In the United States, even though sales of foreign-made automobiles are increasing ,annual sales have been consistently greater for domestically made than for foreign-made new automobiles .
e. Some of the advertising for foreign automobiles in the United States is designed and produced by United Stetes advertising agencies.
答案：B
削弱题，怎么办！！

我觉得weakn题目，最需要关系evdience, conclusion, and the ralation between them
而常用的WEAKEN方法有什么要多想一想,多总结。。
我们现在关心排除错误选项的过程。

evidence: 外国的车广告更能吸引
conclusion: 注重广告会抢会市场。(assumption:人是外国车成功的原因。)

a. 是范围内的人和范围外的人比较(无关范围比较)。。out of scope
b. 某个因素导致结论推不出，正确。
c. 有点tricky..花的钱一样多。。但是前提是比较效果，不是钱。。即使钱一样多，但效果不行，仍然需要注重。。（比较对象发生了转移）
d. 又是比较的转移。。原文FOCUS的是市场失去了这种后果。。。
e. 无关。

carefield

本着不懂就问的原则, 请问什么是兔家族?

Euphony

albert肯定是特耐心一好人，CD友们，珍惜啊，也是偶学习的榜样。

祈晴坊主

呵呵

GG
好改签名了

albert

以下是引用linlin315在2003-7-31 0:03:00的发言：
4、Only in a social milieu in which many parties are scheduled for the same time do party hosts buy visually striking invitations in order to attract the invited guests to the parties. A business that produces visually striking party invitations is currently located in Los Angeles. Thus, it can be concluded that the schedule of parties in Los Angeles must be very crowded.
The argument above is properly drawn if the truth of which of the following is assumed?
a. There is also a business in Los Angeles that produces ordinary party invitations.
b. Party guests can attend no more than one party per evening.
c. At most parties, there are uninvited guests who add to the number of people in attendance.
d. Many of the visually striking party invitations produced in Los Angeles are bought for parties in Los Angeles.
e. Sending party invitations is a duty that hosts rarely delegate to others.
答案是：D
假设题，该怎么做？？

抓住中心词及evidence, conclusion逻辑关系。
evidence : party hosts buy visually striking invitations  --> many parties are scheduled for the same time
conclusion:   produces visually striking party invitations ---> the schedule of parties must be very crowded.

心中理出了以上关系后，就要注意evidence,conclusion之间关系及差异。
好象evidence有个buy..否则是可以合理推出的.
只有D填补了这个GAP
abce脱离了evidence与conclusion之间的逻辑关系。

albert

以下是引用carefield在2003-7-31 11:40:00的发言：
本着不懂就问的原则, 请问什么是兔家族?

我也一直很好奇很纳闷。。不过我猜是GRE pp2得名而来的。

albert

以下是引用祈晴坊主在2003-7-31 12:58:00的发言：
呵呵

GG
好改签名了

一个签名记录着一段时光。。暂时不打算改了。。

linlin315

不小心，让哥哥猜对了！！

以下是引用albert在2003-7-31 20:54:00的发言：

我也一直很好奇很纳闷。。不过我猜是GRE pp2得名而来的。

linlin315

谢谢albert哥哥的精彩解释，兔兔还在领会....
领会精神...(hehe套用siebel哥哥的话）

joywzy

请教ALBERT：

我做削弱题特别差，觉得能读出论据和结论，可是做不对题啊？经常在几个选项中到处找，花的时间多不算，还经常错。

不知有什么办法吗？真是发愁。谢谢。