以下是引用linlin315在2003-7-30 22:27:00的发言: 1、Mass transit authorities in large cities are struggling with deficits. Riders complain about delays and breakdowns, cuts in service, and fares higher than they are accustomed to paying. For all these reasons and because the price of gasoline is still not prohibitive, the number of passengers using public transportaion has fallen, adding to the deficits. Which of the following statements about the relationship between the number of riders using public transportation and the price of gasoline rises, is best supported by the passage above? A. As the price of gasoline rises, the number of riders using public transportation rises B. Even if the price of gasoline rises, the number of riders using public transportation will continue to decline. C. If the price of gasoline rises to a prohibitive level, the number of riders using public transportation will rise D. The majority of riders using public transportation do not use gasoline; hence, fluctuations in gasoline prices are unlikely to affect the number of riders using public transportation E. The price of gasoline is always low enough to make private transportation cheaper than public transportation; hence, fluctuations in gasoline prices are unlikely to affect the number of riders using public transportation. 答案是C 归纳题!!看看这道,怎么用哥哥的大法呢??
呵呵。。大法不敢当。。就是以前大牛常用的傻瓜原则。。
归纳题我觉个人得排除法比较可靠,用傻瓜原则+充分必要条件区别排除。
原题目信息反馈:乱七八糟的原因+高不可攀的票价(这个原因比其他原因重要,因为原文在后面单独列了出来,所以重点注意)导致顾客下降,导致deficit.. 重点读出:1. 因果关系 2. 票价高不可攀是顾客下降的一个必要条件。 读完原文,知道以上信息就够了。。
然后看选项: a,b “看到as...rise”就可以排除掉了。。高不可攀的票价可以理解为一个固定的点。。而ab讨论的是一个随着票价上升的过程发生的事情。。存在差异,无法知道
c 说的是必要条件不满足,结论也不满足。。正确。
d. do not use gasoline...这种都是原文没提到的信息。
e always low enough. 无提到信息。
|