ChaseDream
搜索
123下一页
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

The emission of sulfur dioxide when high-sulfur coal is burned is restricted by law. New coal-burning plants usually comply with the law by installing expensive equipment to filter sulfur dioxide from their emissions. These new plants could save money by installing instead less expensive cleaning equipment that chemically removes most sulfur from coal before combustion.

Which of the following, if known, would be most relevant to evaluating the claim above about how new coal-burning plants could save money?

正确答案: C

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 9557|回复: 22
打印 上一主题 下一主题

天山-3-29

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-2-22 21:33:00 | 只看该作者

天山-3-29

Q29:


The emission of sulfur dioxide when high-sulfur coal is burned is restricted by law.  New


coal-burning plants usually comply with the law by installing expensive equipment to


filter sulfur dioxide from their emissions.  These new plants could save money by


installing instead less expensive cleaning equipment that chemically removes most sulfur


from coal before combustion.



Which of the following, if known, would be most relevant to evaluating the claim above


about how new coal-burning plants could save money?



A. Whether existing oil-burning plants are required to filter sulfur dioxide from their


emissions


B. Whether the expense of installing the cleaning equipment in a new plant is less


than the expense of installing the cleaning equipment in an older plant


C. Whether the process of cleaning the coal is more expensive than the process of


filtering the emissions


D. Whether lawful emissions of sulfur dioxide from coal-burning plants are


damaging the environment


E. Whether existing plants that use the filtering equipment could replace this


equipment with the cleaning equipment and still compete with new plants that


install the cleaning equipment



ans:B mine C?


沙发
发表于 2005-2-23 00:38:00 | 只看该作者

      i think C is the best answer

      the passage told us that there are two methods to prevent the emission of sulfur dioxide and that to remove the pollution chemically is less expensive for new plants than to filter it.

      we are asked to identify how new plants could save money

      A 、B、D  and E are obviously irrelevant to the question

板凳
发表于 2005-4-4 23:41:00 | 只看该作者

这个题目应该是哪个答案呢?我怎么也觉得是C合适点呢。

看B

B. Whether the expense of installing the cleaning equipment in a new plant is less

than the expense of installing the cleaning equipment in an older plant

只是说出新PLANT和旧PLANT的安装费用对比,突出的是新旧厂,这个也不能说明结论啊,请教NN噎。。。。

地板
发表于 2005-4-5 23:30:00 | 只看该作者
怎么得不到大家的确认?我顶啊....顶
5#
发表于 2005-4-13 05:21:00 | 只看该作者
安装费是一次性的,是小头。就算cleaning装置装起来多花些钱也多不到哪里去。
何况cleaning装置还比filter装置便宜。装置本身的费用显然是要比安装的费用多的。
这些都是经济生产里的常识。

真正决定了能不能省钱的往往是设备装好后的日常运行费用。
6#
发表于 2005-4-13 17:15:00 | 只看该作者

choose C.  it compared the expense of   process of cleaning the coal and  the process of

filtering the emissions , which are refered in the passage above.

7#
发表于 2005-6-11 03:01:00 | 只看该作者

why not choose "e"? I think "E" is the most suitable answer because it includes not only the cost but also something relevant to the whole competitive advantage.

8#
发表于 2005-7-2 20:48:00 | 只看该作者
我也选了E,而且现在还徘徊在C和E的边缘。
9#
发表于 2005-7-2 20:51:00 | 只看该作者

想了想E也许是不对,因为问题和选项不搭边

10#
发表于 2005-7-2 21:45:00 | 只看该作者
我也觉得应该选C
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-26 02:50
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部