长江2005学费22万RMB

花则不累

唉,别说什么什么的逼谁谁报中欧,好像报了就能录似的,看不惯一群天天说哪个学校好哪个学校不好,今天报这个不报那个的同学,能不能录还不一定呢.中欧是FT 22名了,不是你因为别的学校学费高,才打算申请的.WHY CEIBS这个问题,你以为那么容易就答了的?是骡子是马,要拉出去才能知道.

花则不累

CK不是有点急躁的问题了,坊间的流言很多关于不正当竞争的事情,三倍薪水挖人,搞得转来转去还是原来那一帮子老人.我们大可不必在意这些流言,真正相信的只有我们自己的眼睛.

中欧这几年的进步是前些年踏踏实实做学问的结果,而且现在真正走上了国际化和本土化结合的独特模式,这点在我们与exchange学校的比较中可以看出来,更让大家高兴的是,中欧自己的文化也慢慢的形成中,认同感和归属感的增强,让每个同学都感觉到了"集体".同学们的凝聚力同时对学校也有了更高的要求.学校借10周年之际,向所有人表明了励精图治的决心和勇于挑战自我的胆魄.

好的地方我们没有必要天天四处宣扬,但是正视自己的弱点才是需要勇气的.学校根据同学们对教授的评价,直接换教授.而同学们也对本土的年青教授展示了宽容和帮助,每个学校都有同学们自己认为好的和不如意的教授,但是这种双方互动真正表现出了顶尖商学院的大气和风格.

学校给我们每个交换学生几个任务,寻找中欧可以借鉴的地方,推荐其他商学院中的优秀教授.踏踏实实,敢于面对自己的弱点,去改进,是学校的态度,踏踏实实用自己的表现去提升中欧,是我们每一个同学的默契.我们有理由相信,这样踏实的作风会让中欧的下一个十年更辉煌.

grossman

Let's have some constructive discussion. Suppose that you are appointed as the Dean of CKGSB and Mr. Li Ka-Shin has given you  two billion RMB. (Harvard has an endowment of 2 billion dollars) What are the steps that you would take to build the school?

here is my suggestion:

1. Hire the best faculty with excellence in teaching and research that you can get. Build a campus and get certification of the programs from the ministry of education.

2. Differentiate the school from others and get the best students that fit with the school's vision well. Make a careful design of the curriculum that emphasizes the strength of the school and execute the course delivery well.

3. Build MBA program as the core of the school. using the faculty's connection to build exchange program with European and US top schools

4. Build EMBA and EDP program as revenue programs that help to make the school sustainable. Exchange with top foreign schools.

I believe this is what CK is trying to do. If you guys have better ideas, you may put in your 2 cents here as well.

[此贴子已经被作者于2005-2-18 23:06:58编辑过]

落花流水

楼上说得4点是一个好的商学院应该具备的基本条件。可想而知，长江还有多么大的差距。如果长江的管理层能够收起浮躁和骄狂的心态，踏实做事，悉心经营，长江还是有希望的。

wang16

以下是引用花则不累在2005-2-18 4:17:00的发言：
唉,别说什么什么的逼谁谁报中欧,好像报了就能录似的,看不惯一群天天说哪个学校好哪个学校不好,今天报这个不报那个的同学,能不能录还不一定呢.中欧是FT 22名了,不是你因为别的学校学费高,才打算申请的.WHY CEIBS这个问题,你以为那么容易就答了的?是骡子是马,要拉出去才能知道.

有道理。。。引以为戒。。

有则改之，善莫大焉。

stanhope

if high quality justifies expensive price, then CK has few to convince the general public that it is in the top-notch level. after all, it requires years of solid pavement for any established fame. haphazard sharp increase in the tution fee in one single year will create more choas rather than positive effects to its accumulating prestige, if any.

grossman

It does take a long time for a business school to establish itself. but I guess CK is trying to signal something to the market. For example, CK may want to hire more faculties from top foreign schools and the campus and degree approval are coming very soon. CK is confident that people will buy the idea. It is indeed a very risky strategy and I hope CK management had thought hard about it. Another problem is that CK may not able to keep its faculties. There are rumours that many of the permanent  faculties there are getting tenured offers from schools like Stanford, UCLA, Duke, Cornell, Wharton, Yale, UBC, etc and they may go back if offers in US look too attractive. CK is walking a fine line in trying to keep these faculties in China and it is not easy.  I hope these people will stay.

花则不累

以下是引用wang16在2005-2-18 22:12:00的发言：

有道理。。。引以为戒。。

有则改之，善莫大焉。

兄弟,我言重了,抱歉.其实没什么,兄弟我实在是爱才心切,故意用激将法.
别往心里去.   

CKGSB_MBA2005

以下是引用wang16在2005-2-17 20:55:00的发言：

连你这样的死党都倒戈了。。长江真的没希望了。。

哈哈哈。。。

不好长江正因为我相信长江愚蠢的提高学费会吓跑一群好的学生。。。而好的学生才是一个商学院成功的基础

我可不是什么死党。 我只是觉得当初我面试时问过他们这个问题，招生办得说应该不会涨，数月过后，居然涨这么多。 说话太不算话了吧。

我也不是被逼得要靠中欧。 只是670分申请长江，长江还要我重考gmat,好像我得考分低了似的。 后来我问了一下04的学生，它们说去年的很多700以上的高分都是进校以后重考的， 这让我感到很失望，这不是再做假吗？  我实在是不懂他们为什么这样看重   gmat

总是两难

还有这种事???