【求助helr】这个题按照helr的方法应该是果因题，但是好像这个题意思不是这样。。

笑小笑小蚂蚁

Some anthropologists study modern-day societies of foragers in an effort to learn about our ancient ancestors who were also foragers. A flaw in this strategy is that forager societies are extremely varied. Indeed, any forager society with which anthropologists are familiar has had considerable contact with modern, non-forager societies.

Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the criticism made above of the anthropologists’ strategy?

(A) All forager societies throughout history have had a number of important features in common that are absent from other types of societies.

(B) Most ancient forager societies either dissolved or made a transition to another way of life.

(C) All anthropologists study one kind or another of modern-day society.

(D) Many anthropologists who study modern-day forager societies do not draw inferences about ancient societies on the basis of their studies.

(E) Even those modern-day forager societies that have not had significant contact with modern societies are importantly different from ancient forager societies.

如果是按照helr的方法的话，
前提是：人类学家利用现代XX学习古代XX的方法是有瑕疵的
结论是：因为过去任何的XX社会都会和现代非XX社会有联系
问削弱。这样看应该是果因，然后应该找能够说明果即说明是其他原因导致有瑕疵。照这样的话不是应该选E吗，而答案正好跟我的方向相反。
如果不是按这样划分前提和结论的话，就不知道该放在哪类细目里面了。。。
求helr大神解答一下！

笑小笑小蚂蚁

有人吗。。。。

Ahbu.

Helr大神的方法我还没彻底搞明白，但是这一题我觉得argument的中心是，由于P：存在flaw，且f 社会和nonf社会接触很多，所以C：anthropologists不能够判定以前哪些是f社会。
这题的驳斥点在于，这个study是否能成功判别f社会...
这是我自己的理解，选A.

Nemo-grape

你把这道题想成类比不就好了。