【求狗主确认！】2014年10月阅读JJ“37.法国妇女做衣服”

chidayuki

看10月狗主的描述，觉得有点像这篇……

贴上来求确认~~

P.S.  LZ并没有详细考古，只是之前看过这篇觉得有点像就贴出来

如果看的各位不是狗主，就看看帮忙推测一下~~别被我误导啦~~~

主要还是想请考过的狗主确认呐~

去掉回复可见了，已经回复到了原狗主帖子下，希望有回复~~~

•原文：
In particular, the late-seventeenth-century introduction of a new style of dress called the manteau or mantua, and its increasing popularity, offered female seamstresses a "wedge " to loosen the tailors' monopoly over the production of more formal, elite, and expensive women's fashions. This new product and more generally the exploding market for clothing, in particular women's clothing, provided seamstresses with the income and market niche from which to expand their numbers and to organize politically within the previously male-dominated trade. Furthermore, they could generally rely on the French state, with its agenda of economic development, to aid in this expansion and organization.

In contrast with much of the prevailing historiography, Crowston demonstrates that when it was in the interest of the French state, authorities were happy to work with and encourage women workers as autonomous producers and not merely as family appendages to guild patriarchs. Crowston thus reinforces Hesse's claim that market expansion brought new opportunities for some women, but she locates these expanding opportunities in the political economy of the late Ancient Regime, rather than in the Revolution's overthrow of it.

In Crowston's history, the seamstresses of Ancient Regime France emerge as relatively powerful and autonomous figures whose work, civic, and gender identities drew upon many sources, but were institutionalized in important ways because of the existence and practices of their guild. The destruction of the guild system during the Revolution thus represents a critical moment in the history of women's work and gender relations—from the perspective of women working in the garment trades, the "freeing" of the market from political constraints brought a largely negative transformation. A closer look at each of these works helps to reveal the origins of the tensions between these two interpretations.

P1  法国pre-Revolution时，一个新式服装manteau的兴起使法国女裁缝打破男裁缝（tailor）垄断的现状，导致女裁缝出现了niche market，opportunities提高，威胁了男裁缝的地位。什么原本是比较高级的衣服，给比较有地位的人穿。但是现在m 这个单词的东西开始使women's clothing market 变得流行。一方观点因为一个新式女服装的兴起，给了法国女裁缝打破男裁缝垄断的现状，并且行会（guild）的兴起，谋求经济和政治的影响力。

P2  说某个人H 分析了一些原因，说政治经济市场等因素促成了以上现象。然后某人C 也同意这个原因。但是他认为它的兴起是在法国大革命前出现的（有题问他们之间的分歧是什么）。因为，大革命虽然带来了一些市场机会，free 了什么什么东西，但是大革命也摧毁了一些行会（guild）,而Guild 对于保护seamstresses 是positive 的。

P3  双方的观点都是一样的对于女裁缝经济的扩张，but 路人甲认为它是在法国大革命前（有题问他们之间的分歧是什么）。因为，大革命的兴起摧毁了传统的经济制度，并且是市场经济兴旺。但是。。。。并且，行会的作用也受到的影响。逐渐削弱。

•题目
1. 另外还有推论题是比较难的，就是from the message can infer 学者A would agree…这题很难
我删到剩两个选项要去比对文章用字，留意！

2. 主题题

3. What is the function of the new style of French women's clothes?（牛牛补充答案，题目我自己写的）
备选答案：Meatu 这种服饰的引入，大大提升了女性cloth-marketing（应该对的，可以回到原文第一段定位到某句话的）

4：What is / What causes the disagreement/dispararity between the two opposing views of female tailors?（牛牛提供选项和思路，我自己写的题目）

5. 好像问对于m 那个单词的那个东西的兴起，下面哪个正确。
我选的是使women's clothesing market 开始兴旺。这是题里原话，定位第一段。

6. 有一题考女裁缝主要受什么影响：
法国大革命（有三个选项有提到）记得要此细看………

7. 推论题问下面哪一个会是A 学者同意的..
我选的是法国大革命给女裁缝带来的好处小于坏处

zw183340

:)

creamyuss

akshasdhasjdhasjh

璟1106

谢谢！！！！！！1

w恶灵

dddddddddddddd

huangjing1987

ddddddddddddddddddddddd

苏鹿

不是法国裁缝么。。。。。。

chidayuki

苏鹿 发表于 2014-10-3 12:51
不是法国裁缝么。。。。。。

10月JJ的标题是法国妇女做衣服~

8月JJ有一个法国裁缝，我看的是之前的一个版本，这是那个版本的原文，后来最终版JJ的原文不是这样的。。但我觉得狗主的描述和我看的那个比较像

matthewysun

感谢啊！！

kw73za

谢谢楼主~