ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Criminologist: Some legislators advocate mandating a sentence of life in prison for anyone who, having twice served sentences for serious crimes, is subsequently convicted of a third serious crime. These legislators argue that such a policy would reduce crime dramatically, since it would take people with a proven tendency to commit crimes off the streets permanently. What this reasoning overlooks, however, is that people old enough to have served two prison sentences for serious crimes rarely commit more than one subsequent crime. Filling our prisons with such individuals would have exactly the opposite of the desired effect, since it would limit our ability to incarcerate younger criminals, who commit a far greater proportion of serious crimes.

In the argument as a whole, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

正确答案: B

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 1653|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求助GWD-19-30一道逻辑题,想不出为什么

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2014-9-22 09:48:20 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
11.GWD-19-Q30
Criminologist:  Some legislators advocate mandating a sentence of life in prison for anyone who, having twice served sentences for serious crimes, is subsequently convicted of a third serious crime.  These legislators argue that such a policy would reduce crime dramatically, since it would take people with a proven tendency to commit crimes off the streets permanently.  What this reasoning overlooks, however, is that people old enough to have served two prison sentences for serious crimes rarely commit more than one subsequent crime.  Filling our prisons with such individuals would have exactly the opposite of the desired effect, since it would limit our ability to incarcerate younger criminals, who commit a far greater proportion of serious crimes.
In the argument as a whole, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?
A.        The first is a conclusion that the argument as a whole seeks to refute; the second is a claim that has been advanced in support of that conclusion.
B.        The first is a conclusion that the argument as a whole seeks to refute; the second is the main conclusion of the argument.
C.        The first is the main conclusion of the argument; the second is an objection that has been raised against that conclusion.
D.        The first is the main conclusion of the argument; the second is a prediction made on the basis of that conclusion.
E.        The first is a generalization about the likely effect of a policy under consideration in the argument; the second points out a group of exceptional cases to which that generalization does not apply.
答案为什么是D?
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2014-9-22 09:49:10 | 只看该作者
D说第一个黑体字是MAIN CONCLUSION,可是这明明是作者反驳的内容啊。是答案错了?还是我没想明白呢?谢谢了!
板凳
发表于 2014-9-28 13:11:38 | 只看该作者
正在看楼主写的托福贴,帮顶~~~~~~~~~
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-27 00:25
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部