橙子酱的作文贴：每天都要写写写

橙圆

0815独立

Modern agriculture method damage theenvironment, but providing food for the growing population around the world ismore important than protecting the environment.

What characterizes modern agriculture mostis its controversial method to increase production. Some people argue that theharm resulting from, such as, pesticide and fertilizer, could be acceptable dueto high yield. However, other people, including me, are against this idea, and Ibelieve that protecting the environment is more important because some agriculturelead to irreversible problem.

A tiny damage to environment could causechain reaction to environment, because our environment, as an organic whole, issusceptible to modern agriculture. Farmers, for instance, reclaim new areasfrom the jungle, thus cutting down the natural growing trees. But these treesplay an important role in preventing soils from washing away by rains. Needlessto say, animals feeding on jungle trees also are influenced. They would losenot only suitable place to build nests but also reliable sources to find food.  Onthe other hand, the decline of population of these animals might result infurther decease in biological diversity. Because of their irregular death,their predator might lack sufficient food supply. Thus if people insist ongreedily depriving environment of food, the crop will yields at the price of environmentalcollapse.

Environment would take long time to recoveronce polluted, since it is really hard for environment to decompose manyartificial chemicals naturally. There once was a river near my home. It was soclear that I could easily see the bottom in my childhood. However, people dumpedfertilizer into it in order to breed fish fry. Within a short period, thesmelly, green water have replaced the clear water; plankton has packed into theriver surface, leaving no fresh air for fish to breathe. Although it’s been somany years, none dares to use the river water for daily life. Foreseeably, in subsequentyears, the governor of our city still has to spare nothing to harness this river.Therefore, today’s blindly high production costs people their future.

Even though I admit that providing morefood today is essential to growing population, protecting environment does notconflict with higher production. A damaged environment means that, quiet sometime, rarely could food be grown in this land. Therefore, many people wouldface starvation as soon as environment was populated. In consequently, whatpeople need to do is not to grow crops without restriction but to find ascientific way to boost output. Luckily, astronomic science has thrown newlight to this area-genetically modified could be a possible way. Hence,providing food for growing might be not of paramount importance.

Owing to the reasons I mentioned above, Ithink that protecting environment is priority over providing food forincreasing population around world. Additionally, improving agriculture methodcould solve this conflict.

今天破事儿一堆 刚回家慌慌张张把作文写完 也没时间看 目测应该错误不少  

啊啊啊啊啊 想到口语还没撸完我就心塞

尿了

daisy333

改完啦~受益匪浅

MrWaiting

815综合改完了

橙圆

0814 综合修改

In the listening, the professor thinks that the approach to assemble a team to attack a project actually leads to a result opposite to what is mentioned in reading passage. He uses a company’s experience to explain the reasons.

First, contrary to what is said in reading passage, the real contributors would not feel better about the group project because some members got almost a “free ride”. They did not make contributions to the group at all but benefited from the group. However the names of members who worked well were not named, because the achievement of the group was considered as a whole. Hence, these contributors’ attitudes are different from what the reading predicts.

Second, conflicting with what is mentioned in reading passage, the group worked less efficiently. It took so long to reach consensus, because the group held many meetings to discuss the project. Thus team work actually went against original purpose.

Third, the professor raised two negative consequences resulting from members who have voice in making a decision. On one hand, some influential people made arbitrary decision without further consideration. Once members were convinced of “a highly creative plan” from influencers, even though some members tried to warn other members that the project was moving towards the wrong way, their voice would be ignored. Therefore, the blame was posed on all group members when the project failed.

橙圆

0815 独立修改

Modern agriculture method damage the environment, but providing food for the growing population around the world is more important than protecting the environment.

What characterizes modern agriculture most is its controversial method to increase production. Some people argue that the harm resulted from, such as, pesticide and fertilizer, could be acceptable due to high yield. However, other people, including me, are against this idea, and I believe that protecting the environment is more important because some agriculture method leads to irreversible problem.

A tiny damage to environment could cause chain reaction to environment. Our environment, as an organic whole, is susceptible to modern agriculture. Farmers, for instance, reclaim new areas from the jungle, thus cutting down the natural growing trees. But these trees play an important role in preventing soils from washing away by rains. Needless to say, animals feeding on jungle trees also are influenced. They would lose not only suitable place to build nests but also reliable sources to find food.  On the other hand, the decline of population of these animals might result in further decease in biological diversity. Because of their irregular death, their predator might lack sufficient food supply. Thus if people insist on greedily depriving environment of food, the crop will yields at the price of environmental collapse.

Environment would take long time to recover once polluted, since it is really hard for environment to decompose many artificial chemicals naturally. There once was a river near my home. It was so clear that I could easily see the bottom in my childhood. However, people dumped fertilizer into it in order to breed fish fry.Within a short period, the smelly, green water have replaced the clear water; plankton has packed into the river surface, leaving no fresh air for fish to breathe. Although it’s been so many years, none dares to use the river water for daily life. Foreseeably, in subsequent years, the governor of our city still has to spare nothing to harness this river. Therefore, today’s blindly high production costs people their future.

Even though I admit that providing more food today is essential to growing population, protecting environment does not conflict with higher production. A damaged environment means that, quiet some time, rarely could food be grown in this land. Therefore, many people would face starvation as soon as environment was polluted. In consequently, what people need to do is not to grow crops without restriction but to find a scientific way to boost output. Luckily, astronomic science has thrown new light on this area-genetically modified food could be a possible way. Hence, providing food for growing might be not of paramount importance.

Owing to the reasons I mentioned above, I think that protecting environment is priority over providing food for increasing population around world. Additionally, improving agriculture method could solve this conflict.

橙圆

0816  独立

折腾了一晚上信用卡 今天 Sorry交晚了 本来说要再改改也没时间了 那那那那 就这样吧

Government budget is always desperately hard up, when confronting two kinds of investment- medical treatment and environmental protection. Some people think that environmental protection takes prior to medical treatment. Other people, including me, are against this idea. I believe that medical security is of paramount importance, especially in my country.

Medical security could mean difference between life and death. Many people lost optimal opportunities to get treatment because of lacking money. In my country, for instance, the poor have no money to cure their disease. They would rather take some pills from drugstore or even give free region to their illness than go to the hospital. However, even minor illness could worsen and thus take people’s life. Therefore, if government provides free medical treatment for these poor people, they would be more willing to receive correct treatment in hospital. In contrast, environment population yet has not directly endangered people’s life. Hence, government should devote more energy to medical security.

Establishing medical security system is an essential way to preserve social order. High profits of selling drugs have lured liars into deceiving patient. Old people and uneducated people are taken in easily. My grandfather, for example, was an old patient, having chronic arthritis more than 20 years. When it was raining, he could only lie on the bed. A seller said that there was an “ effective cure”, which could cure his disease within one month. He spent more than thousands dollars on it without hesitation. A month later, it turns out that he got nothing but blisters on his legs. This tragedy could be avoided if people only could buy drugs from official channel. Thus an effective medical security helps to social stability.

As is so often pointed out, environment governance has a long way to go. Thus it is very difficult to gain effect in a short space of time. Under this circumstance, insisting on habit that protects environment has more profound significance than putting more energy into this issue by government. However, people themselves could not replace the function of government. They could not provide enough money to help poor people and, needless to say, to establish a medical security system. Therefore, compare with environmental protection, government should be more involved in medical treatment.

Owing to the reasons I mentioned above, I think that government has important and irreplaceable responsibility to spend significant energy to medical security.

sigrid_shan

小火山

我觉得 楼主 写的 好好啊

橙圆

小火山 发表于 2014-8-18 20:03
我觉得 楼主 写的 好好啊

严重超时 哈哈哈哈哈哈哈

橙圆

0817 独立

Although a lot of people know the environment situation, the present situation is unlikely to change in the future.

Environment seems to be ruined by modern industry. The blue sky, fresh air, and clear river have gone forever in the city and been replaced by acid rain, vehicle exhausts, and stagnant water. Some people hold the negative view that no method could control the pollution that city has suffered. Other people, including me, are against this idea, and I believe that present situation is not unchangeable.

Environment has its ability to recover from damage, because the movement of air and water and the decomposition of microorganisms could eliminate harmful substances naturally. This phenomenon could easily be observed in our daily life. For instance, after a heavy rain, city looks brand new. A scatter of birds fly in the cloudless blue sky; the air is so clean that people could smell the scent of flowers; insects come out for food, crawling along in the damp road. On the other hand, the modern part of the city also shows its new look-the walls of buildings could reflect the sunlight, looking like mirrors. As we all know, nature forces play more important role in uninhabited areas. Therefore, as long as we do not aggravate our environment intentionally, our environment would save itself.

More and more advanced technology further deceases our threats to environment since many artificial chemical substances are not used anymore when scientists find their side effect. Take Freon as an example. Freon, known as a refrigerant, was wildly used in refrigerator because of its cheap price. However, scientists found that Freon could damage ozone layer, which serves as protective cover to prevent ultraviolet ray and other harmful light. By applying other technology to replace Freon, modern technology provides a way to solve this problem entirely. Similarly, many other things we used in the past have been abandoned gradually, such as plastic bag and mercury. Hence today’s technology has changed environment in a good way.

Social attitudes towards environment totally changed. Our generation, the pillar of society, grows up with the story of environmental protection, thus knowing more about environmental protection than the old does. When my parents knew little about what is the function of frogs, I refused to eat any beneficial insects because of their contributions to the environment. Therefore, an important reason why environment went so bad is that people in the past were not aware of what were the consequences of their behaviors. However, people today would never be stupid and ignorant. We not only know how to protect the environment but also take actions to protect it right now. Thus, anything could not be more effective than an active action to improve our environment.  

Owing to the reasons I mentioned above, I think that, finally, the future would not disappoint us if we try as hard as possible to save our mother earth.

啊啊啊啊啊啊啊 原谅我！！!早上起晚了！急着粗门现在才回！