【Native Speaker每日综合训练—39系列】【39-02】文史哲 Law and the Legal

crazylucia

1'27''
A man who was wrongly convicted of murdering his wife said he has experienced 3 periods in the jail. First, people need to adapt to the life there, totally different with the outside. Second, the anger and bitterness consume you. Third, you become calm and appreciate the the pure things.

1'25''
The judge was furious when he found the defendant use the dirty tactics to acquit.

1'08'' The judge has the right to pus aside a case of which his judgement is not supported by the law. The disclaimer thought this practice may be imperfect.

1'48''
Boehner sues Obama, but the some people think the lawsuit just a political action.

1'30''
Boehner's lawsuit has some effect. But the author does not his intention.

ffffionabear

补作业模式启动~~占~~
————感谢！！！嘿~你的作业~不，是你的作业~(￣_,￣ ) ~~~#作业天天见~~#~~~进击的阅读小分队~~~\(^o^)/~——————————————————
[speaker]
we don't feel freedom any more cause legal change the way we talk,it's too random and detail,even change our culture.any possible for something could do differently.
four,decline in order.
1.juge by effect of the society,not by individual
2.trust is a key foundation
3.law set boundary,and the rest is freedom side.
4.simlify the law that people can internalize it.
[speed]
2'41
When being wrongly convicted of crime,the author doubt the absolute power of government at the begining,and then try to adapt the prison life,obeying and internalizing potential rules in jail.And then he became
hypocritical,covered by a kindly mask,there is anger and bitterness.As decades went by,he went calm and understood life.
2'28
The jury once made a obviously wrong decision in a federal police corruption case.Although the judge was pissed off by the blatant defendants,there is nothing he could do.
1'53
In some judgement as a matter of law cases,judges have the power of set a jury verdict,but in a normal jury trial,the verdict should be based both on law and fact.
2'21(没太留意政治，简直看得头疼(┳＿┳)... )
Boehner threatened lawsuit against President Obama,but the that didn't work,Boehner's complaints about Obama are more for political than for legal or consitiutional side.What's more,his hypocritical is also blamed.
1'44
Boehner's strategy of "sue first,ask question later" might work because Republicans in Supreme Court.
[obstacle](妈蛋头好疼→_→看来要恶补政治了)
8'37
main idea:Obama will unilaterally change the employer mandate.What's more,the suit is so credible for 3 reasons:
1.None of Boehner's suit harm the house as an institution
2.Obama's Care Act lacks merit anyway
3.It's political problem,not legal problem,so the judicial branch has nothing to do

happyxgb

time 2: 1:33
time 3: 2:03
time 4: 1:02
time 5: 2:29
time 6: 1:47
Obstacle: 08:40
The evidence proves that B's sue has no legal ground.  President Obama does not abuse power.
Tribe has given three reasons:no ground; no harm to institution; no role for branch
C's opinion; impeachment is the final strategy
The conclusion of my opinion
法律文章看起来好辛苦。。。

maokee

Time2 1'43
His feeling of being in jail because his murder.
The first day->Several week->several months->several years->few decades->know what you need.

Time3 1'54
A judge who make unwilling judge about the crime.
Everyone believe in cops. And it makes him feel dirty.

Time4 1'12
A judge can made by fact and law.
And in this case the judge can make his desicion by the fact actually.
But the author also says that this is his own thought.

Time5 1'58
Difference thought between Boehner and Obama.

Time6 1'46
Boehner lawsuit.
The author cannot understand the Boehner's thought.
Some departments can cancel the Boehner's decision.

zxppx

1.1-55
It describes a series of changes in the prison from beginning to end, showing the variatoin of emotion, mood, and thinking of the prisoners. At first, the life just likes the end of the world, completely supervised by the law. However, people feel that the trial in the prison is worthy in the end.
2.2-11
What will a judge do when he or she know that the jury makes a wrong verdict? The author knows one judge who came across with the similar situation. In that case, due to the help of cops, the defendent took advantage of the judgment. However, the judge knew the truth and whispered about the dirty tactics.
3.1-28
As a matter of fact, if the judge thinks the verdict of the jury is unconvincing, the judge has the power to make the decision about the case, a situation called a judgment notwithstanding the verdict. As we know, a judge views a case according to laws, while a jury shows its opinion in terms of facts. Thus, when the facts involving jury's emotion cannot persude the judge, the judge have the right to set aside a jury verdict. What's more, this condition applies to both civil and criminal cases.
4.2-18
B wants to sue Obama, but the author shows his/her idea that from two points, B cannot win in the court. For instance, unlike Bush, Obama uses is authority more wisely, cooperating with business to support Obamacare and respecting gay marriage to attract attention.
5.1-50
On the one hand, B doesn't make a clear strategy to file the lawsuit. In the Supreme Court, there are some radical Repulicans rewriting the First Amendment to protect the freedom of corporation. The author expects to see the interesting result. On the other hand, O's party hopes that O's lawsuit can help it win status in the government. However, the author also disapproves of this tactic by pointing out that most Americans have their own opinions about the truth.
6.8-04
As a general rule of thumb, there is a certain process of a lawsuit. However, B sued O without such a part in his lawsuit. T evaluated the event in three aspects. The second point is that B thinked that one of the employer laws supported by O did harm to people. However, the group of people is a very minority. T and the author both think that B wanted the impeachment of the president. But will B and his party get the desired result? It may not happen.

lily510

speed
time 2 [296 words] 2'03"
A man in prison tells the phases a prisoner get through.
there are 5 phases --1...forget,2.can't stand life in prison,and
wanna die.3.wanna build relationship with others,4.started to believe
in faith and love.5.regard jail life as necessary


[Time 3] [323 words]2'32"
describtion of  an unfiar case in which the defants were protected by
the judge and other people.

time4 [228 words]1'34"
introduced a way that judge can side aside the jury result ,a result
that doesn't obey the law.

[Time 5] [330 words]2'19"
Boehher was going to sue Obama,and this passage briefly introduce B,
then analysis why B was likely to fail.there were 2 reasons;


time 6 [294 words]
I DONT UNDERSTAND AT ALL!!!
the sue of B was a polical issue...
and recent revise in some law was disadvantages to B
sth. about politic...I dont really understand...

obstacle
passage 7 12'22"
terms  about law...cant understand..

cyndichiang

Time2 1'24''
A person was wrongly charged of murder,but he learned a lot during the period of prison

Time3 2'27''
Some crops and juries failed to work fairly thus lead to many problems in the process of court for judges

Time4 1'21''
Judges have the power to set aside a jury verdict.

Time5 2'21''
B 's threatened lawsuit against President Obama almost for political reasons

Time6 2'02''
B 's lawsuit is the Republicans' strategy for the foreseeable future

viennall

每次读枣糕的文章都受益匪浅 谢谢枣糕~~

speaker
How to fix a broken legal sysyem.
You've got to judge law mainly by its effect on the broader society, not individual disputes.
Trust is an essential condition to a free society.
What's needed is not just to limit claims, but actually create a dry ground of freedom.
Law has to be simple enough so that people can internalize it in their daily choice.
What's needed is a basic shift in philosophy.
What the world needs now is to restore the authority to make common choices.

speed
02'04 Life in jail is about adaptation. Trials will make you realize who you are.
02'28 During the judge selection, the judge got really pissed off at the defense counsel.
01'01 Jury is the trier of fact and judge is the trier of law.
02'57 To appease the tea party bosses, B has decided to sue the President. He support for robust executive arthority.
02'05 It is not clear which executive arthority B will focus on. Progressives assume that there will be a method to B's madness.

obstacle
07'19
main idea Discussion of B's lawsuit to President.
structure
The lawsuit is figovous.
B is willing to say that HR is injured by President's decision to delay the implementation of employer mandate.
The suit has to be tossed out for three fatal reasons.
None of B' accusations show any harm to House as an institution.
B's complaint lacks merit.
The judicial branch plays no role in any event.
What B is doing will finally lead to an inpeachment effort.

Pumpkin-GMAT

Speed
Time 2 – 1:38 – 296
the feeling of a person who was wrongly convicted of murdering his wife.
Anger and bitter – an understanding of life – our trials make us who we are

Time 3 – 1:55 -324
how do judges feel when the jury made a wrong decision

Time 4 – 1:25 – 228
If the judge believes that the jury's outcome cannot be supported by the law, the judge has the right to set aside the result.

Time 5 – 2:07
Time 6 – 1:32

Obstacle – 8:37
有法律、政治的内容真的是•••看不懂•••果然词汇量是个大问题 先标注 过两天再回来看一遍

junjunejune

39-2
Time2 02:17
exprience in jail, government power.
first in jail,adaption.
revenge, understanding, calmer, faith,
improve us.
Time3 01:43
judge the wrong decision made of a jury,
cop>victims, evidence overwhelming,
one thing during jury,
Time4 01:18
judgment,jury base on the law and fact, EX.

judge(civil,criminal)
Time5 02:00
John against Obama elicited scorn,
duby uses executive authority more often.
Time6 02:02
not identified, depressing, rewrite,
a method, voted.
Obstacle 06:18
好难，总结不出来。