ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[原创]我的第一篇阅读日记OG passage 21,希望大家指正!

[精华] [复制链接]
21#
发表于 2005-1-29 00:07:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用wangyu73cn在2005-1-28 22:19:00的发言:


我覺得,作者僅僅說到希望,但並沒有說他百分百地相信這一結果會實現.例如,我就希望我成為一個完人,但我並不相信.


还是没绕过来。解释里说文章没有显示作者相信二者最终能融和,但是这样并没有说明B选项错误啊。B选项是说相信二者不能融和。

“没显示作者相信融和”能推出“相信不能融和是错误”的吗?

22#
发表于 2005-1-29 22:49:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用fdpy在2005-1-29 0:07:00的发言:


还是没绕过来。解释里说文章没有显示作者相信二者最终能融和,但是这样并没有说明B选项错误啊。B选项是说相信二者不能融和。

“没显示作者相信融和”能推出“相信不能融和是错误”的吗?



你沒有繞出來,我也快繞暈了.哈哈.


“没显示作者相信融和”不能推出“相信不能融和是错误”.是的


但是,,,,一般來講,文章中無,選項就錯誤了,即便選項內容可能沒有錯.


23#
发表于 2005-5-24 11:26:00 | 只看该作者

好文章! 建议加精!:)


125. The author of the passage alludes to the well-established nature of the concept of individual rights in the Anglo-Saxon legal and political tradition in order to
(A) illustrate the influence of individualist feminist thought on more general intellectual trends in English history.


(B) argue that feminism was already a part of the larger Anglo-Saxon intellectual tradition, even though thishas often gone unnoticed by critics of women’s emancipation.  
(C) explain the decline in individualist thinking among feminists in non-English-speaking countries  
(D) help account for an increasing shift toward individualist feminism among feminists in English speaking countries.
(E) account for the philosophical differences between individualist and relational feminists in English speaking countries



The best answer is D. In lines 18-26, the author states that relational feminism “lost ground” in English and the United States while individualist feminism came to predominate, as a result of the well-established concept of individual rights. Choice A is incorrect: lines 22-26 of the passage suggest that individualist feminism was influenced by broader trends in English legal and political tradition. Choice B can be eliminated: the passage does not suggest that feminism was part of the Anglo-Saxon tradition. Choice C is incorrect: individualist feminism is described in lines 18-26 of the passage as growing, not declining. Choice E is incorrect because, although individualist and relational feminists did have philosophical differences, the author does not mention the Anglo-Saxon legal and political tradition in order to account for these differences.


想请教一下,从18-26行如何看出individual feminism是在non-English-speaking 国家中growing呢?


Between 1890 and




1920, however, relational feminism, which had been the



(20) dominant strain in feminist thought, and which still pre-



dominates among European and non-Western feminists,



lost ground in LACE>EnglandLACE> and the LACE>United StatesLACE>. Because



the concept of individual rights was already well estab-



lished in the Anglo-Saxon legal and political tradition,



(25) individualist feminism came to predominate in English-



speaking countries.




[此贴子已经被作者于2005-5-24 11:34:22编辑过]
24#
 楼主| 发表于 2005-5-24 11:50:00 | 只看该作者

Between 1890 and




1920, however, relational feminism, which had been the (过去是,但是现在不是)



(20) dominant strain in feminist thought, and which still pre-



dominates among European and non-Western feminists,



lost ground in LACE>EnglandLACE> and the LACE>United StatesLACE>. Because



the concept of individual rights was already well estab-



lished in the Anglo-Saxon legal and political tradition,



(25) individualist feminism came to predominate in English-



speaking countries.


这段话中有多处提到C得内容是错误的,因为只有提到两种feminism,一种下降,另一种必然dominant

25#
发表于 2005-5-24 14:11:00 | 只看该作者

谢谢而今版版!


请问这样理解是否正确:


1890年前两者并存,以N为主;


1890-1920年,I在英国/美国等崛起,N退居非英语国家;


1920年后,两派各走各路,不过仍以N为主(which still pre- dominates among European and non-Western feminists)

26#
 楼主| 发表于 2005-5-24 14:19:00 | 只看该作者
agree.
27#
发表于 2005-6-22 17:07:00 | 只看该作者

楼主加油!


感谢王牛牛。

28#
发表于 2005-8-22 17:22:00 | 只看该作者

分析的这么透彻,今天看OG第二边,看到此文章,自以为理解文章还算透彻,与楼上两位精彩点评相比,感觉差距很大.


不过象楼主这么分析篇篇文章,估计GMAT也就是个小菜

29#
发表于 2005-8-28 23:19:00 | 只看该作者

WANGYUCN73前辈和楼主对文章的分析真的很精彩的感觉,对比一下自己的总结,发现偶对文章的总结竟然还停留在查清单词的水平上,对文章整体结构的感觉很模糊,对出题思路之类的更是摸不着感觉,OG已经做到28篇了,错题率平均50%,唉。。。


不过偶发现偶的情况和楼上的一位前辈说的差不多,原来没有研究什么XDF的时候,阅读文章时比较专注于文章内容,并能理解和基本记住文章大部分内容,做题时回文中定位基本属于验证或确认自己的记忆,错题率在20%左右;研究了XDF的方法之后,好几篇都全军覆没:可能是因为偶还没有把XDF的做题方法领悟透彻,也可能是因为自身不适合这个方法。


但是偶也在想,不同的文章或许可以有不同的对待,那些没有什么生词的文章或许专注于文章内容比较适合,那种通篇专业生词的文章或许使用一些诸如XDF的做题理论比较恰当---反正这样的文章读了也读不懂。


但是偶也不确定自己的判断,毕竟还是备考初级阶段,继续摸索中。


顺带弱问一下:


文章中的“dominant strain”是主旋律的意思么


谢谢。


最后嬉皮笑脸厚颜无耻地问一句:偶的这个回复像不像一个GMAT阅读的文章呀?

30#
发表于 2005-8-30 14:54:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用supermonkey在2005-8-28 23:19:00

文章中的“dominant strain”是主旋律的意思么

不知道。但楼上这样解释倒不错。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-5 12:45
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部