- UID
- 716240
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2012-2-1
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
板凳
楼主 |
发表于 2013-11-24 22:43:08
|
只看该作者
|
Part 3 Obstacle
Article3 (Check the title later)
JUST THE SEX
BY DAVID DENBY
AUGUST 1, 2011
[Paraphase7]
For the current Vanity Fair cover, the young actress Emma Stone has been outfitted as an overgrown Lolita—bikini, blond hair, flaming-red lips. But in “Crazy, Stupid, Love,” a genial, messy comedy of marital discord and mismatched lovers, Stone has auburn hair and a slightly downturned mouth; she looks like a woman, and she has a direct, clearheaded way about her that suggests the confidence of a potential star. She’s the strongest thing in the movie, though she isn’t part of the main line of the story, which is also the least interesting. It seems that, after twenty-five years, the marriage of Cal (Steve Carell) and Emily (Julianne Moore) is breaking up. Emily has been sleeping with a dull guy in her office (Kevin Bacon, in an unwritten part), and Cal, hearing this news from Emily as she drives them through Los Angeles (the movie’s geography is a little vague), opens the car door and drops to the street like a misplaced bag of groceries. That, I’m afraid, is the highlight of Cal and Emily’s scenes together.
Cal, distraught, airs his troubles in a sleek bar, with amber glass walls and white stonework and a lot of lacquered players—a sort of can-I-buy-you-a-drink store for the always available. Jacob (Ryan Gosling), the king of the bar, a mover in Simon Spurr, Gossuin, and designer stubble, takes pity on the cuckold and teaches him how to pick up women. The king’s own personal closer is “Let’s get out of here,” a line that, unaccountably, seems to work with every woman in the place except one: Hannah (Stone), a law-school graduate, who nimbly dismisses him. At least, at first. She changes her mind, though, and, arriving at his wraparound-glass bachelor pad, demands that he remove his shirt, which he does, revealing a chest and abs so perfectly sculpted that she’s revolted. She says, “Seriously? It’s like you’re Photoshopped!” Men in the audience may be relieved to hear that at least some women find the perfection of a gym body too close to narcissism to be a turn-on, and Stone gives the line, and many others, a quick, precise, tart delivery.
“Crazy, Stupid, Love,” which was directed by the team of Glenn Ficarra and John Requa, mixes a comedy-of-remarriage plot with a midsummer-night’s serial follies. Cal loves his wife; Jacob is fascinated by Hannah; Cal’s thirteen-year-old son, Robbie (Jonah Bobo), loves the teen-ager Jessica (Analeigh Tipton), who babysits for Robbie’s little sister; and Jessica loves, of all people, Cal. Written by Dan Fogelman, the script has many parts in motion, and a fair amount of it works delicately and well. Young Robbie boldly and persistently declares himself to Jessica (he doesn’t know that he’s not even in uniform, much less out of his league), and Analeigh Tipton, a tall, slender stalk with huge pouty lips, receives his declarations so sweetly that the scenes don’t humiliate the actors or us. Robbie’s quest is the overstrained hope of adolescence. The subsidiary plotlines are touching and often funny, but Cal and Emily provide the frame for all the goings on (there are a lot more). And who really cares if these nice, ordinary people remain separated or get back together? They met when they were in high school, and, apart from reminiscing about that time, they don’t have much to say to each other. In the remarriage classics (“The Awful Truth,” “The Philadelphia Story,” “His Girl Friday”), the former partners have a way of talking and being with each other that they don’t have—and couldn’t possibly have—with anyone else. That sophisticated metaphor for sexual compatibility made for uniquely satisfying romantic comedy. But “Crazy, Stupid, Love” holds to the boring modern convention that good people are inarticulate, and Cal and Emily mainly stumble around trying to fill the silence.
Julianne Moore may be too earnest an actress for rigidly structured commercial comedy. She tries to find some hard truths in the role, and she makes Emily angry, vague, and even a little dim. The character is parched and not very likable. Steve Carell has his ordinary-guy’s affect: straight, parted brown hair, elongated, almost-Cyrano nose, slightly rabbity fear of everything. Even in masochistic roles (“The 40 Year Old Virgin,” “Date Night”) in which he plays a guy one-upped sexually by other men, he always conveys the sense that he’s a rational man trying to keep his integrity, no matter how bullied and miserable he feels. It’s not clear to us that Cal, who works at something or other in an office, is good at anything in particular except moping around the back yard of the family house at night after he has moved out. Carell, trying to keep up with Jacob’s smarmy patter in the bar, seems more comfortable acting with Ryan Gosling than with Moore. Gosling, a serious fellow who usually plays alcoholics or drug addicts or murderers, refuses to distance himself from Jacob by parodying the role. His Jacob is not an ironist. He really thinks he’s God’s gift to women—apparently, no one before Hannah has told him otherwise—and he wants to spread the glory, slapping Cal to get his attention, and then leading him through a makeover, dressing him in Canali and Zegna, and teaching him such startlingly original moves as not to talk about himself when he meets a woman in a bar. Applying his superlative new techniques, Cal has his mishaps and his successes, but the filmmakers believe in soul mates forever, and that kind of thing, and the audience may not want to think about the aftermath of the movie, in which Cal and Emily discuss, again and again, that magical year they met in high school.
“Friends with Benefits” is another of those movies in which a man and a woman—in this case, Justin Timberlake as Dylan, a Los Angeles Web designer who takes a magazine job in New York, and Mila Kunis as Jamie, the head-hunter who recruits him—spend hours debating Nietzsche, Heidegger, and Sartre before committing themselves to serious talk of omelettes. No, wait. That’s in French movies. In “Friends with Benefits,” Dylan and Jamie hop into bed and make very particular demands on each other, but agree not to indulge in anything so dirty or squalid as emotion. The rule is: you may do anything you like as long as you don’t feel anything for the other person. James Thurber and E. B. White asked, “Is sex necessary?” The new trend in romantic comedy is to ask, “Is love necessary?” This movie is incomparably better than the pathetic Ashton Kutcher–Natalie Portman picture from earlier this year, “No Strings Attached,” in which the man and the woman, also friends with benefits, go at it in hospital supply closets and hybrid cars. At least Timberlake and Kunis stay in bed. And at least they talk—a great deal, in fact, and often very cleverly. “Friends with Benefits” is fast, allusive, urban, glamorous—clearly the Zeitgeist winner of the summer (the couple take the no-emotion pledge by laying their hands on a tablet Bible app). The writers, Keith Merryman, David A. Newman, and Will Gluck, who also directed, keep the characters racing ahead, each trying to outsmart the other, in and out of bed.
This mini-genre of shag-buddy pictures is rather coy (there’s only one way, in American movies, that these stories can end). And, from the beginning, its titillations are mildly delusional: can you really have sex with the same person, again and again, without experiencing any emotion at all? I know it doesn’t sound unpleasant, but can you really? Despite the mild daring of the concept, what keeps these plots going is that old screenwriting standby, the fear of commitment. Both Dylan and Jamie are supposed to be emotionally damaged. That is, unlike the rest of the world, they come from families with problems. But they don’t look the least bit damaged; they look and sound terrific, and it’s their healthy sparring that makes the movie fun. Justin Timberlake, as he demonstrated playing Sean Parker in “The Social Network,” is a shrewd actor who knows how to swing his body through a scene. His glib, talented Dylan, though, isn’t overly impressed with himself. Timberlake is charming, and he’s a dynamo when he begins imitating old pop groups (except his own). Mila Kunis, of the almond-shaped eyes and the dusky skin, is all teasing mischief and easily hurt feelings. Woody Harrelson, trying to play a gay sports editor at Dylan’s magazine, twists himself into knots. His performance is ridiculous—half the time, you don’t know what he’s saying—but you enjoy Harrelson enjoying himself. Patricia Clarkson has a comic turn as Jamie’s alcoholic, sex-addicted mom, and Richard Jenkins, as Dylan’s dad, does what he always does, which is to make his part of the movie the best part of the movie. A smart man with Alzheimer’s, painfully aware that he’s losing it, he lays down, for Dylan’s sake, some elementary life lessons. His advice, as written, is obvious, but Jenkins speaks the words with such passionate conviction that he makes them seem like ultimate wisdom.
[Words: 1530]
Source: New Yorker
http://www.newyorker.com/arts/critics/cinema/2011/08/01/110801crci_cinema_denby
|
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看，没有帐号？立即注册
x
|
[复制链接]
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2013-11-24 22:40:50
But if you do, you will be disappointed~
收藏
收藏
