[求助]天山-3-23 BF

ring_cheng

这在去年新东方发的补充教材上也出现过，费费给的答案是E：E. The first presents a goal that the argument endorses; the second presents a situation that the argument contends must be changed if that goal is to be met in the foreseeable future.

不过我还是倾向于D。请继续讨论。

[此贴子已经被作者于2005-5-2 20:51:26编辑过]

leisure1221

feifei xdf补充教材上确实是e，他上课时也讲到了这道题（去年年底），当时我没什么异议，但复习的时候仔细阅读，发现e虽然看起来说的通，但与d对照一下，还是d好，描述的更确切且没有错误的地方，e我虽然也没跳出太大毛病，但感觉还应该是d

skidals

请问B为什么不对？

skidals

up up!

pengpengming

B is wrong, becs the author argues that the plan is ill-conceived, not the goal.

E感觉不如D好: a situation that the argument contends must be changed指的不像是黑体部分:"farmers will never actually sell....", must be changed更象是在指后面的"if the farms are left unmodernized"

illgetthere

以下是引用pengpengming在2005-7-4 16:14:00的发言：

B is wrong, becs the author argues that the plan is ill-conceived, not the goal.

但B说的是presents a goal that the argument concludes can not be attained, 即认为plan是ill-conceived，所以我认为B比D好！

请指教

[此贴子已经被作者于2005-9-19 0:00:10编辑过]

illgetthere

upup!

stevewu

這題好纏阿..

考試遇到這種題目第一個舉白旗...

ogram

同意skidals和illgetthere的意见

audreylin100

簡單解釋題目:

環保機構想要達到保護土地使其不要成為住宅區,所以想要去收購農地

因為農夫不可能全部賣出,所以收購是無用的方法

但是農夫沒有使用現代化機械器具的資金,這些土地就無法耕種(這樣有可能仍會開發成住宅區)

所以  應該提出更好的策略協助農夫現代化耕種 (如此就可以達到環保土地的目標了)

B. The first presents a goal that the argument concludes cannot be attained; the second is a reason offered in support of that conclusion.

the first : 文中沒有下結論說環保的目標一定無法達成, 只是undermine the method and proposes a better solution

我覺得這一段話是評估一個方法   針對GOAL的達成與否   文中持保留的態度

如果使用協助農業現代化的方法 ...目標是有可能達成的

所以A B C 對the first 的說法都有誤

對於E

我覺得the first is correct but the second is error

E. The first presents a goal that the argument endorses; the second presents a situation that the argument contends must be changed if that goal is to be met in the foreseeable future.

因為  農夫不賣地的現象  是不會改變的  只是要用其他方式協助農夫

所以覺得a situation must be changed 有問題

我暈了~~~

[此贴子已经被作者于2005-10-5 17:37:31编辑过]