ChaseDream
搜索
123下一页
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Environmental organizations want to preserve the land surrounding the Wilgrinn Wilderness Area from residential development. They plan to do this by purchasing that land from the farmers who own it. That plan is ill-conceived: if the farmers did sell their land, they would sell it to the highest bidder, and developers would outbid any other bidders. On the other hand, these farmers will never actually sell any of the land, provided that farming it remains viable. But farming will not remain viable if the farms are left unmodernized, and most of the farmers lack the financial resources modernization requires. And that is exactly why a more sensible preservation strategy would be to assist the farmers to modernize their farms to the extent needed to maintain viability.

In the argument as a whole, the two boldface proportions play which of the following roles?

正确答案: D

相关帖子

更多...

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 12527|回复: 22
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]天山-3-23 BF

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-1-7 07:37:00 | 只看该作者

[求助]天山-3-23 BF

天山3-23


Environmental organizations want to preserve the land surrounding the Wilgrinn Wilderness Area from residential development. They plan to do this by purchasing that land from the farmers who own it. That plan is ill-conceived; if the farmers did sell their land , they would sell it to the highest bidder, and developers would outbid any other bidders. On the other hand, these farmers will never actually sell any of the land, provided that farming it remains viable. But farming will not remain viable if the farms are left unmodernized, and most of the farmers lack the financial resources modernization requires. And that is exactly why a more sensible preservation srategy would be to assist the farmers to modernize their farms to the extent needed to maintain viability.


A. The first presents a goal that the argument rejects as ill-conceived; the second is evidence that is presented as grounds for that rejection.


D. the first presents a goal, stragegies for achieving which are being evaluated in the argument; the second is a judgment providing a basis for the argument's advocacy of a particular strategy.


答案是D, 我觉得A 没什么不好啊.  第二句话怎么是judgment 而不是 evidence了? 另外perservation 目的就是maintain viability吗?

沙发
发表于 2005-1-7 08:00:00 | 只看该作者

Environmental organizations want to preserve the land surrounding the Wilgrinn Wilderness Area from residential development. 环境保护者的目标是土地不被用作住宅开发,而不是保护土地不用来种地。这个目标是作者也支持的。所以
A. The first presents a goal that the argument rejects as ill-conceived;是错的。

板凳
发表于 2005-1-7 12:43:00 | 只看该作者


[此贴子已经被作者于2005-1-7 12:43:56编辑过]
地板
发表于 2005-1-7 17:48:00 | 只看该作者
我开始也选A,后来发现题目中ill-conceive是指plan而不是这个想法,所以A错了
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2005-1-8 04:24:00 | 只看该作者

谢谢greeley, philipzhou, 我才发现ill-conceive指的是plan. 两位真是细心, 一语道破啊! 向你们学习.

6#
 楼主| 发表于 2005-1-8 04:29:00 | 只看该作者

另外想说明一下, 这道题前后的stragety 有shift. 前面说的是Environmental organizations preserve the land from residential development.

后面的是preservation srategy

太搞了点.

7#
发表于 2005-3-2 20:57:00 | 只看该作者

請問D選項  哪來的strategies??

strategies不是在原文第二句才出現麼?

I think E is better!

8#
发表于 2005-3-7 00:10:00 | 只看该作者
strategy是plan的同义词转换。

E里说到situation ... must
bechanged,而实际上第二种strategy就是要保持这种situation,通过assist the farmers
tomodernize their farms to maintain viability, 从而 these farmers will never actually sell any of the land,

进而 preserve the land  from residential development.

所以E错。
[此贴子已经被作者于2005-3-7 0:13:42编辑过]
9#
发表于 2005-3-25 18:34:00 | 只看该作者
问一个弱弱的问题?什么叫judgement在逻辑术语中?
10#
发表于 2005-3-26 03:23:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用skyguard2000在2005-3-7 0:10:00的发言:
strategy是plan的同义词转换。

E里说到situation ... must
bechanged,而实际上第二种strategy就是要保持这种situation,通过assist the farmers
tomodernize their farms to maintain viability, 从而 these farmers will never actually sell any of the land,

进而 preserve the land  from residential development.

所以E错。

先把题目贴全:

Environmental organizations want to preserve the land surrounding the Wilgrinn Wilderness Area from residential development. They plan to do this by purchasing that land from the farmers who own it. That plan is ill-conceived; if the farmers did sell their land , they would sell it to the highest bidder, and developers would outbid any other bidders. On the other hand, these farmers will never actually sell any of the land, provided that farming it remains viable. But farming will not remain viable if the farms are left unmodernized, and most of the farmers lack the financial resources modernization requires. And that is exactly why a more sensible preservation srategy would be to assist the farmers to modernize their farms to the extent needed to maintain viability.


A. The first presents a goal that the argument rejects as ill-conceived; the second is evidence that is presented as grounds for that rejection.
B. The first presents a goal that the argument concludes cannot be attained; the second is a reason offered in support of that conclusion.
C. The first presents a goal that the argument concludes can be attained; the second is a judgment disputing that conclusion.
D. The first presents a goal, strategies for achieving which are being evaluated in the argument; the second is a judgment providing a basis for the argument’s advocacy of a particular strategy.

E. The first presents a goal that the argument endorses; the second presents a situation that the argument contends must be changed if that goal is to be met in the foreseeable future.


答案应该就是D。D非常tricky,须仔细读,strategies for achieving which are being....是修饰goal定语从句,不是presents的宾语。E选项第二句话不对,“如果X那么Y”是a judgement(论断),不是situation。


[此贴子已经被作者于2005-3-26 3:25:03编辑过]
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-26 22:36
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部