prep08 一道阅读题求解答

QueenG

  Since the 1850s researchers have tried to show that variations in seasonal weather are connected in some way with sunspots, the outward sign of an increase in the Sun’s activity. However, scientists lacked evidence supporting such a link until the mid-1980s, when van Loon and Labitzke compiled statistical evidence suggesting that a link exists and that it involves winds in the upper atmosphere above the equator which reverse their direction, from east to west or west to east, every twelve to fifteen months. This phenomenon is called the quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO), and although meteorologists have known about the QBO since the 1950s, until the 1980s no one recognized a subtle but statistically significant link between the QBO and certain patterns of weather. When the west to east direction of winds in the upper atmosphere coincides with periods of high solar activity that occur approximately every eleven years, winters in the eastern and central United States are very cold.
   On this basis, some meteorologists predicted that the winter of 1988-1989 in the United States would be severe. However, the winter was a mild one overall, and the meteorologists’ attempt to make the connection between the Sun and weather on the Earth appeared unsuccessful, until Barnston and Livezey proposed a hypothesis explaining why the prediction failed. They argued that the prediction had not taken into account another important element in the climate: the more or less regular pattern of fluctuations in the temperature of the surface waters of the tropical Pacific Ocean.
    Barnston and Livezey noted that when the water temperature is abnormally high-the phenomenon called EL Nino-the chances of cold winter weather over North America increase. The opposite situation, when surface temperatures are well below normal- La Niña -is far less common.  In fact, until late 1988 no one had seen the combination of La Nina, westerly winds in the upper atmosphere, and high solar activity. Thus, according to Barnston and Livezey, La Nina cancelled out the effect of the other two climatic factors and caused the mild winter of 1988-1989. Although this hypothesis is plausible, much research remains to be done before meteorologists can establish and explain the effects of increased solar activity on seasonal weather changes.

The passage provides information to support which of the following statements about La Niña?
A.        Its occurrence is more likely to coincide with period of high solar activity rather than low solar activity.
B.        It is more likely to occur when the winds in the upper atmosphere above the equator are blowing from the west rather than from the east.
C.        It occurs more frequently than do shifts in the winds in the upper atmosphere above the equator.
D.        It occurs less frequently than does increased solar activity.
E.        It occurs less frequently than does El Niño.

答案是D，我选的是E。理由：最后一段：The opposite situation, when surface temperatures are well below normal- La Niña -is far less common.我认为是Na nina跟El nino相比是less common，所以选E。请大家说说为什么E不对D对，谢谢。

hjsdssz

帮顶！ 我也有一样的问题 顺便问一下楼主或者其他做过这篇阅读的大神第四题为何是E而不是C？ 谢谢