我看到阅读后很纳闷怎么就2段,然后听力貌似讲了三个方面,所以手足无措不知道怎么写了。不清楚到底该分几个部分。建议:综合就写成三点,因为考官一般按三点给分,写了2点只能得三分之二的分数了。
0808综合 TPO02
In the passage, working in group has many advantages for not only the whole group but also the team members. However, in the lecture, the professor has a different idea and using two examples to opposite it.
Firstly, the passage claim that working in groups can be more efficient because people in the team have different kinds of knowledge to do the things that are difficult for individual and they can discuss before leap, which decrease the rate of walking a wrong way. But the professor said that the efficiency could be decreased according to an experiment, for it could be more difficult for all the people to get an idea together and it is not easy for them to change the direction once they were wrong.
Secondly, the passage said that all the team members could benefit as they can find the suitable work for themselves and have better chance to contribute to the team. Nevertheless, the professor argue that in fact, the result of the experiment showed that the one doing the best is not always get the reward s/he owned and all the team members could be to blame when they get wrong, which means no one would be punished.(基本是根据自己理解写的,但是表述有些简单)
听听力的时候注意关键词,比如本文的on virtually every team, Another finding was, on the other hand,这些key word会引出观点,观点也是在作文中写在句首的。
附上范文
Thelecturer talks about research conducted by a firm that used the group system tohandle their work. He says that the theory stated in the passage was verydifferent and somewhat inaccurate when compared to what happened in reality. First,some members got free rides. That is, some didn’t work hard but got recognitionfor the success nontheless. This also indicates that people who worked hardwere not given recognition they should have gotten. In other words, theyweren’t given the opportunity to “shine”. This directly contradicts what thepassage indicates. Second,groups were slow in progress. The passage says that groups are more responsivethan individuals because of the number of people involved and their aggregated resources.However, the speaker talks about how the firm found out that groups were slowerthan individuals in decision making. Groups needed more time for meetings,which are necessary procedures in decision making. This was another place whereexperience contradicted theory. Third,influential people might emerge and lead the group towards glory or failure. Ifthe influent people are going in the right direction there would be no problem.But in cases where they go in the wrong direction, there is nobody that hasenough influence to counter the decision made. In other words, the group mightturn into a dictatorship, with the influential party as the leader, and mightbecome less flexible in its thinking. They might become one-sided, and thus failto succeed. |