ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Several industries have recently switched at least partly from older technologies powered by fossil fuels to new technologies powered by electricity. It is thus evident that less fossil fuel is being used as a result of the operations of these industries than would have been used if these industries had retained their older technologies.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument above?

正确答案: E

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2587|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG13 CR67

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2013-7-5 17:45:17 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Several industries have recently switched at least
partly from older technologies powered by fossil fuels
to new technologies powered by electricity. lt is thus
evident that less fossil fuel is being used as a result of
the operations of these industries than would have
been used if these industries had retained their older
technologies.
Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the
argument above?
(A) Many of the industries that have switched at
least partly to the new technologies have
increased their output.
(B) Less fossil fuel was used to manufacture the
machinery employed in the new technologies
than was originally used to manufacture the
machinery employed in the older technologies.

(C) More electricity is used by those industries that
have switched at least partly to the new
technologies than by those industries that have
not switched.
(D) Some of the industries that have switched at
least partly to the new technologies still use
primarily technologies that are powered by
fossil fuels.
(E) The amount of fossil fuel used to generate
the electricity needed to power the new
technologies is less than the amount that would
have been used to power the older technologies.

这个题选E。我的疑问在于OG对于A的解释。为什么A削弱了结论??OG原话:For if fossil fuels are used to produce the electricity now used by the industries and if it is because of these newer technologies that output has increased, the arguement's conclusion is less likely.
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2013-7-5 18:50:28 | 只看该作者
原文的结论说,由于部分生产转而用电,因此用燃料量减小了。其中暗含的假设是,生产总量在转变前后没有变化。因此,如果生产量实际增长了,由于增长部分是在哪种机器(新旧)生产的不确定,舅不能得出原文的结论了,因为消耗量有可能是增长的。
板凳
发表于 2013-7-17 22:45:31 | 只看该作者
请问大神们 B选项为什么不对 不太懂
地板
发表于 2013-7-18 00:59:34 | 只看该作者
hemodata 发表于 2013-7-5 18:50
原文的结论说,由于部分生产转而用电,因此用燃料量减小了。其中暗含的假设是,生产总量在转变前后没有变化 ...

machinary 是一次性投资, 用电量是持续的。 如果造一个用电的机器这个过程比较省油, 但是一旦开工每一度电耗油很大, 那么整体耗油就很大。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-10 00:31
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部