ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 25533|回复: 55
打印 上一主题 下一主题

天山-7-11

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-12-16 23:29:00 | 只看该作者

天山-7-11

In 1992 outlaw fishing boats began illegally harvesting lobsters from the territorial waters
of the country of Belukia. Soon after, the annual tonnage of lobster legally harvested in
Belukian waters began declining; in 1996, despite there being no reduction in the level of
legal lobster fishing activity, the local catch was 9,000 tons below pre-1992 levels. It is
therefore highly likely that the outlaw fishing boats harvested about 9,000 tons of lobster
illegally that year.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
A. The illegal lobster harvesting was not so extensive that the population of
catchable lobsters in Belukia’s territorial waters had sharply declined by 1996.
B. The average annual lobster catch, in tons, of an outlaw fishing boat has increased
steadily since 1992.
C. Outlaw fishing boats do not, as a group, harvest more lobsters than do licensed
lobster-fishing boats.
D. The annual legal lobster harvest in Belukia in 1996 was not significantly less than
9,000 tons.
E. A significant proportion of Belukia’s operators of licensed lobster-fishing boats
went out of business between 1992 and 1996


MINE B


ANS A


盼讨论


谢谢!

沙发
发表于 2004-12-17 02:27:00 | 只看该作者

题目里好象没有说1992年以来非法捕捞平均量在STEADILY增加吧,这个STEADILY是很有问题的啊。

A的意思是,非法捕捞并没有多到让龙虾数量急剧减少的程度。这样就正好说明了题意,因为龙虾总数量不变,合法捕捞减少的龙虾数量就正好被非法捕捞的人给弄走了。

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2004-12-17 11:36:00 | 只看该作者

解释的好清楚啊

谢拉

SHUAISHUAI真是逻辑高手!

地板
发表于 2005-1-7 20:08:00 | 只看该作者

不知道为什么经常会把那个not给忽略了,把题目看反了

5#
发表于 2005-2-7 17:51:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用Shuaishuai在2004-12-17 2:27:00的发言:

题目里好象没有说1992年以来非法捕捞平均量在STEADILY增加吧,这个STEADILY是很有问题的啊。


A的意思是,非法捕捞并没有多到让龙虾数量急剧减少的程度。这样就正好说明了题意,因为龙虾总数量不变,合法捕捞减少的龙虾数量就正好被非法捕捞的人给弄走了。


文中哪里说了龙虾的总数量不变呀?只说了"despite there being no reduction in the level of
legal lobster fishing activity," --合法捕的龙虾活动没有减少,这并不等于龙虾的总数量没变吧??

A不怎么象答案呀?请再解释解释.

6#
发表于 2005-2-8 15:48:00 | 只看该作者

文章里没说,A选项里说了呀。A选项的意思就是说龙虾的总数没有受影响。对吧?

7#
发表于 2005-2-9 06:13:00 | 只看该作者

Q7:
The passage is primarily concerned with
A. examining economic factors that may have contributed to the success of certain
Japanese companies
B. discussing the relative merits of strategic partnerships as compared with those of
market-exchange relationship
C. challenging the validity of a widely held assumption about how Japanese firms
operate
D. explaining why Western companies have been slow to adopt a particular practice
favored by Japanese companies
E. pointing out certain differences between Japanese and Western supplier
relationships

为什么答案不是B??

8#
发表于 2005-4-18 08:18:00 | 只看该作者
market-exchange relationship仅仅在文中最后提到,非中心思想.
9#
发表于 2005-4-21 12:14:00 | 只看该作者

A. The illegal lobster harvesting was not so extensive that the population of catchable lobsters in Belukia's territorial waters had sharply declined by 1996.

这句话是第二楼解释的意思吗?“非法捕捞并没有多到让龙虾数量急剧减少的程度。”

我怎么感觉如果要表示这个中文意思的话,需要说“The illegal lobster harvesting was not so extensive that the population of catchable lobsters in ... had not sharply declined by 1996."

  请各位帮忙看看!

10#
发表于 2005-4-21 12:33:00 | 只看该作者

google到了2句not so..that...作用截然不同的两句话。

1) The references are extensive but not so extensive that quality students or
other readers would be intimidated.   

2) PTS has made the assessment that the problems with building permits that exist are not so extensive that they can now form a basis for amending the conditions of the licence.

要不是11题只有A看上去像的,俺才不会选这道呢,not so .. that.. 的作用太不确定了。

大虾们,快来帮忙指点指点!

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-5 12:04
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部