ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 4256|回复: 9
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大全-III-8

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-12-4 22:39:00 | 只看该作者

大全-III-8

8.     State X’s income-averaging law allows a portion of one’s income to be taxed at lower rate than the rate based on one’s total taxable income. To use income averaging, the taxpayer must have earned taxable income for a particular year that exceeds 140 percent of his or her average taxable income for the previous three years. People using income averaging owe less tax for that year than they would without income averaging.


Which of the following individuals would be most seriously affected if income averaging were not permitted in computing the taxes owed for current year?


(A) Individuals whose income has steadily decreased for the past three years


(B) Individuals whose income increased by 50 percent four years ago and has remained the same since then


(C) Individuals whose income has doubled this year after remaining about the same for five years


(D) Individuals who had no income this year, but did in each of the previous three yearsC


(E) Individuals who are retired and whose income has remained about the same for the past ten years


不明白红色部分的意思,请那为NN指点迷津

沙发
发表于 2004-12-4 23:28:00 | 只看该作者

People using income averaging owe less tax for that year than they would without income averaging.

适用收入平均法的人那年将少交税(相比没有该法而言)。

板凳
发表于 2005-5-14 00:15:00 | 只看该作者
A为什么不对呢?
地板
发表于 2005-7-4 04:03:00 | 只看该作者
问题问的是如果不实行这种法律,哪部分人受的影响最大。而A中的人连续3年收入下降,根本就不是该法律适用的人群,所以该法律A中的人没有影响。故A不对。
5#
发表于 2005-9-14 11:44:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用orchidbrook在2005-5-14 0:15:00的发言:
A为什么不对呢?

補充一下~

We dont know how much the individual in A will make after their 3 years..so it's hard to tell whether they will be the most seriously affected ones..

6#
发表于 2006-2-9 12:47:00 | 只看该作者
还是不懂,昏死阿阿阿
7#
发表于 2006-4-21 17:23:00 | 只看该作者

个人认为,前面连续三年下降,但没有提到下降的幅度,所以第四年也未必能够达到题中要求-达到前三年平均值的140%;而C中明确指明Individuals whose income has doubled this year after remaining about the same for five years

8#
发表于 2006-7-3 02:49:00 | 只看该作者
这题选C从推理上有点不理解?请NN解释一下!!
9#
发表于 2006-7-3 05:02:00 | 只看该作者

The question asks: 如果不实行这种法律,哪部分人受的影响最大.

换个说法,新税法谁最占便宜?

It's obvious that those are the individuals whose income has doubled this year after remaining about the same for five years.

Plug in a number and do the calculation yourself,  and you will find out why.

10#
发表于 2006-7-3 05:36:00 | 只看该作者
谢谢乐,晕在没把问题与题干结合思考。。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-10-6 16:21
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部