ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Generally scientists enter their field with the goal of doing important new research and accept as their colleagues those with similar motivation.Therefore, when any scientist wins renown as an expounder of science to general audiences, most other scientists conclude that this popularizer should no longer be regarded as a true colleague.

The explanation offered above for the low esteem in which scientific popularizers are held by research scientists assumes that

正确答案: D

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 7787|回复: 12
打印 上一主题 下一主题

prep 07 有一道题不懂求解答~~~

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2013-3-23 18:00:40 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
50.    (34317-!-item-!-188;#058&007562)

Generally scientists enter their field with the goal of doing important new research and accept as their colleagues those with similar motivation.  Therefore, when any scientist wins renown as an expounder of science to general audiences, most other scientists conclude that this popularizer should no longer be regarded as a true colleague.

The explanation offered above for the low esteem in which scientific popularizers are held by research scientists assumes that

(A) serious scientific research is not a solitary activity, but relies on active cooperation among a group of colleagues
(B) research scientists tend not to regard as colleagues those scientists whose renown they envy
(C) a scientist can become a famous popularizer without having completed any important research
(D) research scientists believe that those who are well known as popularizers of science are not motivated to do important new research
(E) no important new research can be accessible to or accurately assessed by those who are not themselves scientists




原文:通常来说,科学家进入他们的领域时,目的是去做important new research;而且他们也认为自己的同僚(their colleague)有着类似的动机。但是,当有些科学家由于向普通大众解释了科学后享有盛名,其他科学家就认为这帮出了名的科学家不再是自己的true colleague了。


D说:Research科学家认为不是因为newresearch而进入科学领域的人不是科学家—所以不承认!


可是我觉得E也对啊:E有两个no ,然后两个都去掉之后翻译的是:new research 只有真正的科学家才有。 我觉得是assumption啊,哪里有问题呢????求解答~~~~~~~
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2013-4-4 23:07:15 | 只看该作者
你对题干的理解不太对。

题目是说科学家们把有做研究的动机的人视为同僚,当有些科学家成名之后,其他科学家就不把他们视为同僚了。
为什么呢?因为他们认为成名之后做研究的动机就没了。

你根据这个意思再想想。
板凳
发表于 2013-4-5 12:49:09 | 只看该作者
accept as their colleagues those with similar motivation这句话中,those是宾语。
accept (those with similar motivation) as their colleagues.
接受有同样动机的人作为自己的同僚。
地板
发表于 2013-6-14 00:49:00 | 只看该作者
楼上牛逼
5#
发表于 2013-6-14 04:39:31 | 只看该作者
这道题是linke the gap
colleague --> doing important research.
scientist wins renown --> not a true colleague
链接gap:
Not a true colleague --> not doing important research. 答案D
原文讲的是true colleague和doing important research之间的关系,和是不是科学家没有关系啊。E属于无关选项。
6#
发表于 2013-12-15 22:35:26 | 只看该作者
suzibi 发表于 2013-6-14 04:39
这道题是linke the gap
colleague --> doing important research.
scientist wins renown --> not a true c ...

牛逼!
一看你这个我就懂了
7#
发表于 2017-1-16 22:49:55 | 只看该作者
suzibi 发表于 2013-6-13 21:39
这道题是linke the gap
colleague --> doing important research.
scientist wins renown --> not a true c ...

解释的很到位
8#
发表于 2017-8-7 10:57:02 | 只看该作者
真武剑 发表于 2013-4-5 12:49
accept as their colleagues those with similar motivation这句话中,those是宾语。
accept (those with s ...

同意!               
9#
发表于 2017-8-11 09:06:49 | 只看该作者
优秀!
10#
发表于 2017-10-3 14:58:15 | 只看该作者
真武剑 发表于 2013-4-5 12:49
accept as their colleagues those with similar motivation这句话中,those是宾语。
accept (those with s ...

同意!               
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-1 19:53
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部