boldface一道题~~

stellalights

Plant scientists have used genetic engineering on seeds to produce crop plants that are highly resistant to insect damage.Unfortunately, the seeds themselves are quite expensive, and the plants require more fertilizer and water to grow well than normal ones.Thus, for most farmers the savings on pesticides would not compensate for the higher seed costs and the cost of additional fertilizer. However, since consumer demand for grains, fruits, and vegetables grown without the use of pesticides continues to rise, the use of genetically engineered seeds of this kind is likely to become widespread.

In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

(A) The first supplies a context for the argument; the second is the argument's main conclusion.

(B) The first introduces a development that the argument predicts will have a certain outcome; the second is a state of affairs that the argument denies will be part of that outcome.

(C) The first presents a development that the argument predicts will have a certain outcome; the second acknowledges a consideration that weighs against that prediction.

(D) The first provides evidence to support a prediction that the argument seeks to defend; the second is that prediction.

(E) The first and the second each provide evidence to support the argument's main conclusion.
答案C我可以理解了啊，但是不太明白C中的prediction指的是什么，是Thus, for most farmers the savings on pesticides would not compensate for the higher seed costs and the cost of additional fertilizer. 这个结论吗？黑脸题中，prediction就是conclusion吗？？
求解！！

stellalights

weigh against是权衡的意思吗？

stellalights

木有人来回答嘛呜呜

icewaterkira

prediction是这句话Thus, for most farmers the savings on pesticides would not compensate for the higher seed costs and the cost of additional fertilizer.
Ron对这个题目的解释是。第二个黑体是对文章结论的削弱。
文章的结论是：Thus, for most farmers the savings on pesticides would not compensate for the higher seed costs and the cost of additional fertilizer.
这是原帖。不明白的话可以看看
http://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/plant-scientists-have-used-genetic-engineering-on-seeds-t2270.html

Dianakisscat

Plant scientists have used genetic engineering on seeds to produce crop plants that are highly resistant to insect damage.Unfortunately, the seeds themselves are quite expensive, and the plants require more fertilizer and water to grow well than normal ones.Thus, for most farmers the savings on pesticides would not compensate for the higher seed costs and the cost of additional fertilizer. However, since consumer demand for grains, fruits, and vegetables grown without the use of pesticides continues to rise, the use of genetically engineered seeds of this kind is likely to become widespread.

In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

(A) The first supplies a context for the argument; the second is the argument's main conclusion.

(B) The first introduces a development that the argument predicts will have a certain outcome; the second is a state of affairs that the argument denies will be part of that outcome.

(C) The first presents a development that the argument predicts will have a certain outcome; the second acknowledges a consideration that weighs against that prediction.

(D) The first provides evidence to support a prediction that the argument seeks to defend; the second is that prediction.

(E) The first and the second each provide evidence to support the argument's main conclusion.
答案C我可以理解了啊，但是不太明白C中的prediction指的是什么，是Thus, for most farmers the savings on pesticides would not compensate for the higher seed costs and the cost of additional fertilizer. 这个结论吗？黑脸题中，prediction就是conclusion吗？？
求解！！

-- by 会员 stellalights (2013/1/23 18:22:51)

C : The first presents a development that the argument predicts will have a certain outcome;
the second acknowledges a consideration that weighs against that prediction .


你说的没错，这个prediction就是Thus, for most farmers the savings on pesticides would not compensate for the higher seed costs and the cost of additional fertilizer.


仔细读选项可以看出来。

stellalights

再回过头来看这道题， 我怎么突然觉得conclusion是最后一句了呢。 试想啊，读完这段文字，你得出的结论是什么？ 那肯定是 最后一句话的内容啊。不见得你读完了这段话，得出的结论是thus后面的内容吧。。。。


求助啊！！