5号 综合作文 TPO5 The reading passage explores the issue of the function of the Chaco great house. The professor’s lecture also deals with the same topic. However, professor insists that the assumptions about the function of the house are unconvincing, which contradicts what the passage mentions. And in the lecture, professor uses three specific points to prove his idea.
First, even though the passage states that because the Chaco house appear strikingly similar to the “apartment building” at Taos, so the Chaco house were purely residential. The professor argues that even the outside of the building is similar to residential house, but inside of the house disprove it. Since the large house has rooms for 100 families but only has 10 fire place, which is not enough. Obviously, the professor’s argument disproves his counterpart in the passage.
Moreover, despite the statement in the passage that the Chaco house structure were used for store food supplies. Since the size of the house would make them very suitable for the purpose. The professor contends that this assumption is also unsupported by pointing out that the excavation could not find trace of the maize or containers.
Finally, the professor assert that since excavation also discovered a lot of other materials that could not be related to the ceremony, building materials such as sand stone, even construction tools, so pots could just be regular trash. Whereas the passage claims that the house were used as ceremonial centers. In conclusion, the passage clearly identifies the weaknesses in the passage.
5号 综合作文 TPO5 The reading passage explores the issue of the function of the Chaco great house. The professor’s lecture also deals with the same topic. However, professor insists that the assumptions about the function of the house are unconvincing, which contradicts what the passage mentions. And in the lecture, professor uses three specific points to prove his idea. 听力的基调是驳论，而非立论，可以多体现驳斥色彩的词，以表明文章态度 First, even though the passage states that because the Chaco house appear strikingly similar to the “apartment building” at Taos, so the Chaco house were purely residential. The professor argues that even the outside of the building is similar to residential house, but inside of the house disprove it. Since the large house has rooms for 100 families but only has 10 fire place, 这里是个细节 largest house enough 100 families but the fire place can only support ten families. which is not enough. Obviously, the professor’s argument disproves his counterpart in the passage.
Moreover, despite the statement in the passage that the Chaco house structure were used for store food supplies. Since the size of the house would make them 单复数变化very suitable for the purpose. The professor contends that this assumption is also unsupported by pointing out that the excavation could not find trace of the maize or containers.
Finally, the professor assert that since excavation also discovered a lot of other materials that could not be related to the ceremony, building materials such as sand stone, even construction tools, so pots could just be regular trash. 这句话逻辑有点混乱 试试拆开些吧 感觉pots 是在句末凭空出来的和前面缺少逻辑联系，阅读：excavation 有pots 所以推测用作ceremony，听力：除了pots 还有其他materials 是建筑垃圾，推翻ceremony 的假设。 展开点写出来逻辑更清晰些，而且占些字数Whereas the passage claims that the house were used as ceremonial centers. In conclusion, the passage clearly identifies the weaknesses in the passage.
5号 综合作文 TPO5 The reading passage explores the issue of the function of the Chaco great house. The professor’s lecture also deals with the same topic. However, professor insists that the assumptions about the function of the house are unconvincing, which contradicts what the passage mentions. And in the lecture, professor uses three specific points to prove his idea. 听力的基调是驳论，而非立论，可以多体现驳斥色彩的词，以表明文章态度 First, even though the passage states that because the Chaco house appear strikingly similar to the “apartment building” at Taos, so the Chaco house were purely residential. The professor argues that even the outside of the building is similar to residential house, but inside of the house disprove it. Since the large house has rooms for 100 families but only has 10 fire place, 这里是个细节 largest house enough 100 families but the fire place can only support ten families. which is not enough. Obviously, the professor’s argument disproves his counterpart in the passage.
Moreover, despite the statement in the passage that the Chaco house structure were used for store food supplies. Since the size of the house would make them 单复数变化very suitable for the purpose. The professor contends that this assumption is also unsupported by pointing out that the excavation could not find trace of the maize or containers.
Finally, the professor assert that since excavation also discovered a lot of other materials that could not be related to the ceremony, building materials such as sand stone, even construction tools, so pots could just be regular trash. 这句话逻辑有点混乱 试试拆开些吧 感觉pots 是在句末凭空出来的和前面缺少逻辑联系，阅读：excavation 有pots 所以推测用作ceremony，听力：除了pots 还有其他materials 是建筑垃圾，推翻ceremony 的假设。 展开点写出来逻辑更清晰些，而且占些字数Whereas the passage claims that the house were used as ceremonial centers. In conclusion, the passage clearly identifies the weaknesses in the passage.
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2012-12-23 23:48:15
楼主
