og问题，纠结了挺久的啦~~

sweetzhuo

OG12 CR 51
51. One variety of partially biodegradable plastic beverage container is manufactured from small bits of plastic
bound together by a degradable bonding agent such as cornstarch. Since only the bonding agent degrades,
leaving the small bits of plastic, no less plastic refuse per container is produced when such containers are
discarded than when comparable nonbiodegradable containers are discarded.
Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument above?

(A) Both partially biodegradable and nonbiodegradable plastic beverage containers can be crushed
completely ?at by refuse compactors.

(B) The partially biodegradable plastic beverage containers are made with more plastic than comparable
nonbiodegradable ones in order to compensate for the weakening effect of the bonding agents.

(C) Many consumers are ecology-minded and prefer to buy a product sold in the partially biodegradable
plastic beverage containers rather than in nonbiodegradable containers, even if the price is higher.

(D) The manufacturing process for the partially biodegradable plastic beverage containers results in less
plastic waste than the manufacturing process for nonbiodegradable plastic beverage containers.

(E) Technological problems with recycling currently prevent the reuse as food or beverage containers of the
plastic from either type of plastic beverage container.

我很纠结于og给出的对A的解释是：Nonbiodegradable plastic containers can be crushed completely fl at. To say that biodegradable ones can be completely crushed also is perfectly compatible with saying that they contain less plastic. 这样的解释不是说明两个含有差不多的plastic吗？那不就支持了原文的内容了吗？？

sweetzhuo

。。。自己顶一下！！走过路过的帮个忙啊。。。

九尾

题干逻辑链：可降解的container 只有一部分可降解 so 被丢弃后不可降解的部分不会比不可降解的container少
你理解错那个compatible了 OG的解释意思是 A说的东西其实跟题目讲的东西是兼容的 所以就根本不会strengthen
至于B选项 ：不可降解的塑料条因为强度原因其实更多 很明显是support了