ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: mrsyue
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD-10-40 搜索过了,但是不服气

[复制链接]
11#
发表于 2005-9-15 22:21:00 | 只看该作者

这道题难道不是在反对前提吗? 有时觉得怎么有时反对前提就错,有时就对呢?


请指教

12#
发表于 2005-9-15 22:23:00 | 只看该作者
D为何不对?
13#
发表于 2005-10-10 23:26:00 | 只看该作者

up

14#
发表于 2005-10-24 15:06:00 | 只看该作者

D.是一個固定誘惑選項,常常ets喜歡這樣出...


就是他常常會用few(少部份)的人、事、物來怎樣怎樣...其實是不容易weaken結論的。因為即便是如d所言,結論方向依舊可以不變


15#
发表于 2005-11-8 18:07:00 | 只看该作者
D说few people愿意花比现在还高的价格买,而题中农民期望的价格就是现在的价格吧。higher price than they are now paying错了
16#
发表于 2005-12-10 20:30:00 | 只看该作者
我觉得B也不是很对,选项或者题目并没有说农民们会使用这种新药,好像缺少这样一个前提吧?
17#
发表于 2005-12-11 11:21:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用mrsyue在2004-11-10 4:56:00的发言:

Q40:
Insect infestations in certain cotton-growing regions of the world have caused dramatic increases in the price of cotton on the world market.  By contrast, the price of soybeans  has long remained stable. Knowing that cotton plants mature quickly, many soybean  growers in Ortovia plan to cease growing soybeans and begin raising cotton instead, thereby taking advantage of the high price of cotton to increase their income significantly, at least over the next several years.





Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the plan’s chances for success?







A. The cost of raising soybeans has increased significantly over the past several years and is expected to continue to climb.





B.   Tests of a newly developed, inexpensive pesticide have shown it to be both environmentally safe and effective against the insects that have infested cotton crops.





C.   In the past several years, there has been no sharp increase in the demand for cotton and for goods made out of cotton.





D. Few consumers would be willing to pay significantly higher prices for cotton goods than they are now paying.





E.   The species of insect that has infested cotton plants has never been known to attack soybean plants.




答案B, 我选C.


If cotton demand is unlikely to increase sharply, yet there comes a sharp rise in the number of cotton growers (i.e. cotton supply), it is likely that the price of cotton will drop, weakening the argument.


In B however, the new pesticide is only likely to enhance the growers' success because it helps them against cotton insects. It half supports the argument.


大家怎么想呢?

需求量可能一直都没有增加, 但是由于病虫害, 价格上升。所以种豆农可能转行。 转行短期也可能发财。 只有b, 一旦杀虫剂管用, 立竿见影, 削弱结论 , 就是他了
18#
发表于 2006-4-27 15:03:00 | 只看该作者

D:


能削弱农民是否会获得更高的利润,而不能削弱是否能获利。因为现在的价格已经增加了。

19#
发表于 2007-1-18 07:12:00 | 只看该作者

  B是ETS设置的无关选项, In the past several years的信息和将来无关,而且该选项中没有给出任何进一步的信息说明将来的情况,该选项为典型的ETS迷惑选项。

   D也是迷惑选项,个人认为其错误关键在于意愿不意原做事,不一定能影响结果,他不想做,就不做拉?所以,表意愿的东东,如没有进一步的假设,其结果应视为不确定,不能做为正确答案。再进一步说,如果根据意愿就能有确定结果,按ETS的偏好,哇,那是哲学,不是逻辑!

     个人认为这题比较有价值的地方,倒是提醒大家对题干中附加前提或信息认真理解的重要性。题干一开始就提到Insect infestations in certain....可以想一想,ETS在寸字寸金的题干中给这个有什么用,不就是想考我们吗? 很多情况下,ETS正确答案的设置都是和题干中所给的附加前提的信息有关.

20#
发表于 2007-6-18 21:29:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用lawyer_1在2004-11-10 9:05:00的发言:
C 错在它讲的是过去几年的情况,结论是讲以后几年的情况,不同。

嗯嗯~

看来我的有关无关学的还是很不到位呀~

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-10-6 20:40
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部