gwd-6-4 是这么理解吗?

cccccc0

In the past the country of Siduria has relied heavily on imported oil.  Siduria recently implemented a program to convert heating systems from oil to natural gas.  Siduria already produces more natural gas each year than it burns, and oil production in Sidurian oil fields is increasing at a steady pace.  If these trends in fuel production and usage continue, therefore, Sidurian reliance on foreign sources for fuel should decline soon.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

1. In Siduria the rate of fuel consumption is rising no more quickly than the rate of fuel production.

    C.No fuel other than natural gas is expected to be used as a replacement for oil in Siduria.

C取非后说还有其他的fuel可以代替oil,那么我们可以推出如果其他的fuel需要import得话，结论不久部成立了me?

谢谢~~

gonghao

I think the answer should be A.If consumption is getting much more quicker thatn the production.Imported fule would be necessary again.

In your opinion ,you said if we can find sth in S that could be used to replace the oil ,it will be a great news for S since there will be another fuel could be used to compelement the fuel consumption.The foreign source for fuel will decline soon for sure.

In your logical inference ,you said that if new fuel found ,it must be a fuel which will be cetain to rely on import in the future.How could you get such conclusion?

So C won't be the answer.

tangzimo

OK

yoyo2007

C：取非，只有天然气可以用作石油的替代品

我也觉得这个取非意思有问题。

amorela

C选项其实是无关的.它说只有NAUTURAL GAS可以代替OIL,但是这并没有说NATURAL GAS的consuming是否会超过它的productive,有可能会超过有可能超不过---超过,就不需要进口了.超不过,还是得进口.

对于这种模棱两可的选项很有迷惑性.但是仔细看GWD的题里,很多题目是类似选项,直接就可以排除掉了.

这里原文是讨论说FUEL的使用量和生产工具量的关系,会不会使S进口量减少这么一回事儿.C突然冒出个其他取代不取代这么个事儿,根本就是驴头不对马嘴了.

[此贴子已经被作者于2007-12-2 22:21:10编辑过]

zhizhi139

fuel=oil+gas

if fuel up, gas up, oil maybe up

if fuel down, gas up, oil should be decline

thus A is right!

eileenmu木

up

ppjelly

D.Buildings cannot be heated （by
     solar energy） rather than （by oil or natural gas）.


想问一下，这个句子的意思，偶对这种否定的rather than不太清楚，无论是否定句还是肯定句，把rather than当成一个not，是不是就对了。这句的意思是不是，Buildings cannot be heated by solar energy. Buildings can be heated by oil or natural gas. 请NN确认一下啊，谢谢啦。

batmanhm

取非:建筑物能通过太阳能供暖而不是用石油和天然气

ppjelly

hi,谢谢楼上的。那么原句的意思就是，建筑物不能通过太阳能供暖，而可以通过石油和天然气。对吧？：）

以下是引用batmanhm在2008-5-12 22:35:00的发言：
取非:建筑物能通过太阳能供暖而不是用石油和天然气