ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

When hypnotized subjects are told that they are deaf and are then asked whether they can hear the hypnotist, they reply, "No." Some theorists try to explain this result by arguing that the selves of hypnotized subjects are dissociated into separate parts, and that the part that is deaf is dissociated from the part that replies.

Which of the following challenges indicates the most serious weakness in the attempted explanation described above?

正确答案: A

相关帖子

更多...

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2559|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求讲解~og13 cr 62题

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-10-3 12:21:20 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
62. When hypnotized subjects are told that they are deaf and are then asked whether they can hear the hypnotist,
they reply, "No." Some theorists try to explain this result by arguing that the selves of hypnotized subjects are
dissociated into separate parts, and that the part that is deaf is dissociated from the part that replies.
Which of the following challenges indicates the most serious weakness in the attempted explanation
described above?
(A) Why does the part that replies not answer, "Yes"?
(B) Why are the observed facts in need of any special explanation?
(C) Why do the subjects appear to accept the hypnotist's suggestion that they are deaf?
(D) Why do hypnotized subjects all respond the same way in the situation described?
(E) Why are the separate parts of the self the same for all subjects?

这道题目是怎样的逻辑链??
谢谢!
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2012-10-3 13:43:03 | 只看该作者
因为被试者回答的部分和被试者聋的部分被完全分开了,所以当被试者被催眠并认为自己耳聋后仍然回答no。
选A
因为如果被试者认为自己是聋的的部分和回答问题的部分被分开,那么回答问题的部分并不聋,且可以不认为自己聋,因此应回答yes,可是他回答no,也就是回答问题的部分认为自己是聋的,即,被试者根本就没有被分成两个部分。
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2012-10-3 14:07:52 | 只看该作者
ok~明白了~
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-26 20:51
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部