wangyu73cn之阅读加油站(21楼为考试体会)

soaring

偶给一个~！

david_liu

相当好。令人感慨。

共勉共勉

kate_kite

原来wangyu兄台这么牛呀，失敬失敬！

wangyu兄台，我现在的阅读正遇到最大的问题。因为我最近刚刚开始综合地做模拟题，逻辑和语法的正确率都尚可，单单阅读～～阅读～～都快郁闷死了，以前单项做阅读时，我的正确率在60％－70％左右，可是一到综合模拟时，觉得时间紧，读文章很慌张，正确率一下子下降到30－40％，三次模拟都是阅读上问题最大。到现在没有上过50％。

不知道兄台以前是否遇到过我这样的问题，烦请给些指点，多谢！！

wangyu73cn

现在的阅读正遇到最大的问题。因为我最近刚刚开始综合地做模拟题，逻辑和语法的正确率都尚可，单单阅读～～阅读～～都快郁闷死了，以前单项做阅读时，我的正确率在60％－70％左右，可是一到综合模拟时，觉得时间紧，读文章很慌张，正确率一下子下降到30－40％，三次模拟都是阅读上问题最大。到现在没有上过50％。

好像是在考600分之前的几周中做模考时，遇到过类似问题，哈哈。别紧张，我的分数可能也失真很多。

不过，我认为这可能就是没有深入理解的结果吧，当然做模考软件时间很紧张，说明速度上有点问题，但我感觉不是主要问题。我想，无论如何你可能是做完的了。这就挺好。我是想问问你看OG到底看明白了没有呢。在OG几部分中，SC应是先突破的部分。因为可控性较强。而逻辑我缺乏仔细研究，好像难度要大于SC，不过阅读的难度也确实很大。我就常常把握不住阅读的正确思路。所以模考的这个正确率能反映一些情况，说明你在阅读方面的弱势，也基本和大家学习OG的共性相吻合的。所以还是看看OG吧。既然你也在北京，你就在那些时间打电话给我吧。：）我们再深入看看你的问题。

jaredyu

感激不尽！！！

IBMDELL2

请wangyuGG再回头帮忙看看有关og-rc -1的一个问题，谢谢！

请大家帮帮我：

But Snyder et al point out that the caffeine concentrations needed to inhibit the production
of phosphodiesterase in the brain are much higher than those that produce stimulation.
是否可以翻译成：但是，Snyder等人指出：阻止大脑中phosphodiesterase产生所需的咖啡因浓度要远远高于那些可产生刺激的咖啡因浓度。

这里的those指代的是caffeine吗？

kate_kite

以下是引用wangyu73cn在2004-11-9 20:39:00的发言：

。

好像是在考600分之前的几周中做模考时，遇到过类似问题，哈哈。别紧张，我的分数可能也失真很多。

不过，我认为这可能就是没有深入理解的结果吧，当然做模考软件时间很紧张，说明速度上有点问题，但我感觉不是主要问题。我想，无论如何你可能是做完的了。这就挺好。我是想问问你看OG到底看明白了没有呢。在OG几部分中，SC应是先突破的部分。因为可控性较强。而逻辑我缺乏仔细研究，好像难度要大于SC，不过阅读的难度也确实很大。我就常常把握不住阅读的正确思路。所以模考的这个正确率能反映一些情况，说明你在阅读方面的弱势，也基本和大家学习OG的共性相吻合的。所以还是看看OG吧。既然你也在北京，你就在那些时间打电话给我吧。：）我们再深入看看你的问题。

谢谢wangyu兄，我再自己体会体会领悟领悟，有机会一定和你好好交流～

flowerrainn

Prior to 1975, union efforts to organize public-sector clerical workers, most of whom are women, were somewhat limited. The factors favoring unionization drives seem to have been either the presence of large numbers of workers, as in New York City, to make it worth the effort, or the concentration of small numbers in one or two locations, such as a hospital, to make it relatively easy. Receptivity to unionization on the workers’ part was also a consideration, but when there were large numbers involved or the clerical workers were the only unorganized group in a jurisdiction, the multi-occupational unions would often try to organize them regardless of the workers’ initial receptivity. The strategic reasoning was based, first, on the concern that politicians and administrators might play off (to set in opposition for one's own gain从中渔利；在…之间挑拨离间) unionized against non-unionized workers, and, second, on the conviction that a fully unionized public work force meant power, both at the bargaining table and in the legislature. In localities where clerical workers were few in number, were scattered in several workplaces, and expressed no interest in being organized, unions more often than not ignored them in the pre-1975 period.

But since the mid-1970’s, a different strategy has emerged. In 1977, 34 percent of government clerical workers were represented by a labor organization, compared with 46 percent of government professionals, 44 percent of government blue-collar workers, and 41 percent of government service workers. Since then, however, the biggest increases in public-sector unionization have been among clerical workers. Between 1977 and 1980, the number of unionized government workers in blue-collar and service occupations increased only about 1.5 percent, while in the white-collar occupations the increase was 20 percent and among clerical workers in particular, the increase was 22 percent.

What accounts for this upsurge in unionization among clerical workers? First, more women have entered the work force in the past few years, and more of them plan to remain working until retirement age. Consequently, they are probably more concerned than their predecessors were about job security and economic benefits. Also, the women’s movement has succeeded in legitimizing the economic and political activism of women on their own behalf, thereby producing a more positive attitude toward unions. The absence of any comparable increase in unionization among private-sector clerical workers, however, identifies the primary catalyst—the structural change in the multi-occupational public-sector unions themselves. Over the past twenty years, the occupational distribution in these unions has been steadily shifting from predominantly blue-collar to predominantly white-collar. Because there are far more women in white-collar jobs, an increase in the proportion of female members has accompanied the occupational shift and has altered union policy-making in favor of organizing women and addressing women’s issues.

The author’s claim that, since the mid-1970’s, a new strategy has emerged in the unionization of public-sector clerical workers would be strengthened if the author

(A) described more fully the attitudes of clerical workers toward labor unions

(B) compared the organizing strategies employed by private-sector unions with those of public-sector unions

(C) explained why politicians and administrators sometimes oppose unionization of clerical workers

(D) indicated that the number of unionized public-sector clerical workers was increasing even before the mid-1970’s（E）

(E) showed that the factors that favored unionization drives among these workers prior to 1975 have decreased in importance

请教WAYNE 这题。

不知道是题目理解有误还是什么，不是很清楚为什么要选E。

题目说什么能够加强这种新的STRATEGEY 出现的说法，答案说是如果以前的影响UNINIZATION的因素减少了，可是我的问题就在与：

以前的UINIZATION的因素包括：1.   the number of clerical workers in that group

                2.whether the clerical workers in that area were concentrated in one workplace or scattered over several workplaces

                 3. the degree to which the clerical workers in that group were interested in unionization

                 4. whether all the other workers in the same jurisdiction as that group of clerical workers were unionized

而文中最后段解释这种新现象出现的原因：

                   First, more women have entered the work force in the past few years, and more of them plan to remain working until retirement age. Consequently, they are probably more concerned than their predecessors were about job security and economic benefits. Also, the women’s movement has succeeded in legitimizing the economic and political activism of women on their own behalf, thereby producing a more positive attitude toward unions.

            1人数增加了， 由于女权运动，2妇女的工会的态度有改变――― receptivity   增加了

         

             1和1对应，2和2对应。 不正是出现了和以前的因素相同的，才有MORE  UNINIZATION 吗？ 所以以前的因素并没有DECREASED，所有如果DECREASE不能加强现在出现新现象的原因

   

[此贴子已经被作者于2004-11-10 22:57:19编辑过]

wangyu73cn

花雨，我先把解释部分贴出，供大家参考：1、E is the best answer. 2、The question asks what would strengthen the author’s claim that a new strategy for nionization has emerged since the mid-1970’s. 3、Lines 30-31 cite the appearance of the new strategy. 4、The paragraphs that follow describe the changed circumstances that provided a context for such new strategies. 5、Lines 70-76 explain precisely how these changed circumstances created a reason for new unionizing strategies.  6、The author’s claim would be strengthened if it could be shown not only that there are such new circumstances, but that the old circumstances discussed in the first paragraph have become less important, further necessitating the adoption of a new strategy in place of an old strategy suitable to those older circumstances.

花雨分析的很细致啊。从一个新的角度把文章的前后联系起来了。不过，其实，我想你的问题很简单。你应当注意到：选项E中是说，showed that the factors that favored unionization drives among these workers prior to 1975 have decreased in importance。这个限定词很关键。影响工会人员组成有第一段所列的几方面问题，具体到实际中，这些方面可能是有利的，也可能是不利的。除个别楼主列出的原因外，文中并没有特意明确在哪个方面是有利还是不利。选项只是说，有利于原来那种模式的因素降低了，当然就可以从逻辑上知道，现在这种模式因此得到加强了。不知说清楚没有。如果明白了，就不用看下面的比方了。

打个比方，就像学校判断我是否可以拿奖学金一样，他们要知道我成绩、工作经验、受教育情况等几方面的情况。以前我成绩600不利，经验丰富有利，教育良好有利，结果不给奖学金。如何加强我可以得到奖学金这个结论呢，当然是对原来有利于不发奖学金的论据（在此即成绩不好）进行否定或减弱。现在成绩上700了，对原来论点的有利因素减弱了，自然起到加强发奖学金这一论点的作用。其实，我们也可以不用知道我的具体情况，只要知道“喔，那个家伙的某项有利于学校做出否定结论的因素现在减弱了，所以现在学校可能会给他肯定结论”就可以了。这就是选项E的意思吧。

所以，OG的解释就是告诉我们如何切中要点的，该想的想想，不该想的就不用想了。

唉，说得好罗嗦啊。：）

另外，你的题目是不是已经找全了，如果没有，请参照：http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardID=25&ID=78262&page=1

另外，IBMDELL2的问题见：http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardID=25&ID=62012&page=1

[此贴子已经被作者于2004-11-11 1:12:24编辑过]

flowerrainn

谢谢WAYNE 的这么细致的解答，辛苦了，明白了你的意思，可是还没有解决心中的疑问，因为你强调的E中 FAVERED 我也想到过，可是文中第一段提出来的就是这样说的 FAVORING

The factors favoring unionization drives seem to have been either the presence of large numbers of workers, as in New York City, to make it worth the effort, or the concentration of small numbers in one or two locations, such as a hospital, to make it relatively easy

.      可见这些因素本来就是有利的呀？

唉，还是算了吧，今天做了GWD第一套，现在面临全面崩溃，阅读几乎全军覆没，别的也都是一塌糊涂。看来我太笨了，还是不要浪费GG的时间了。