ChaseDream
搜索
1234下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 4649|回复: 34
打印 上一主题 下一主题

Rose也来练写作,咿呀咿呀呦~~~欢迎猛拍!!

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-9-2 00:02:42 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
纠结。。。纠结。。。再纠结了之后,终于一咬牙一跺脚,开了作文帖了~~要不真心不想看~~~

9.16就考试的人,现在才开始写作会被鄙视的吧~~~呜呜。。。

不管怎么说啦,各位partner, 路过的大侠,猛猛的拍哟~~~~小女子Rose感激不尽!!!
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2012-9-2 09:30:26 | 只看该作者
Rose 加油
板凳
发表于 2012-9-2 09:53:08 | 只看该作者
!!!
我在想,要不要吼吼ZTG11003的筒子们来。。。。。。(← ← )围观!
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2012-9-2 14:06:06 | 只看该作者
呜呜~不要不要~人家会害羞滴~~~~~~(*^__^*) 嘻嘻……
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-9-2 14:29:29 | 只看该作者
从今天开始在ALEX手底下干活喽~~~
先发个综合吧~~~木有掐时间呀~~写了好多字,好啰嗦好啰嗦~~~~掩面!!!
The professor in the lecture refutes the opinion in the reading passage by saying that even though there may be some problems caused by online encyclopedias, those problems are just a small price considering the huge value it has.



In the first place, the reading part talks about errors and the lack of academic credentials. However, the speaker contradicts this point by pointing out that those mistakes are much less than those of traditional, printed encyclopedias. Although there are some mistakes there, they can be more easily corrected online instead of remaining offline for decades.



In the second place, the writer claims that unscrupulous users or hackers change important entries. So we may lose the original one. However, the speaker points out 2 methods to prevent hackers efficiently. One is that the crucial facts in the articles are set to read-only form, which means no one can change them. The other method is to have special editors whose job is to monitor those articles.



In the third place, the reading part shows that it is hard to determine what is important and what is not. But the professor tells us that since traditional encyclopedias have limited space, they are facing the choice talked above. Limited space is never a problem for communal encyclopedias. What is more, this diversity of materials is one of the strongest advantages of communal encyclopedias.



In conclusion, the professor in the listening part holds the opposite opinion about the topic in the reading material. She believes that the advantages of communal online encyclopedias carry more weight, although there are of course some drawbacks.
6#
发表于 2012-9-4 06:04:38 | 只看该作者
不好意思啊。MM,我来晚了。。

The professor in the lecture refutes the opinion in the reading passage by saying that even though there may be some problems caused by online encyclopedias, those problems are just a small price considering the huge value it has(一句话概括总点,简洁有力)
In the first place, the reading part talks about errors and the lack of academic credentials. However, the speaker contradicts this point by pointing out that those mistakes are much less than those of traditional, printed encyclopedias. Although there are some mistakes there, they can be more easily corrected online instead of remaining offline for decades.(这句instead of 句型用得很到位,学习了)
In the second place, the writer claims that unscrupulous users or hackers change important entries. So we may lose the original one. However, the speaker points out 2(上次看有个贴,说是写作的数学要写英文才行,有待确认) methods to prevent hackers efficiently. One(逗号+小写) is that the crucial facts in the articles are set to read-only form, which means no one can change them. The(逗号+小写,主要是我以前了有这个问题,有大牛给我这样改的,因为是看作一整句话) other method is to have special editors whose job is to monitor those articles.
In the third place, the reading part shows that it (这里最好继续说明一下是ONLINE ENCYCLOPEDIAS)is hard to determine what is important and what is not. But the professor tells us that since traditional encyclopedias have limited space, they are facing the choice talked above. Limited space is never a problem for communal encyclopedias. What is more, this diversity(这个词用的比我好,我怎么没想出来,汗) of materials is one of the strongest advantages of communal encyclopedias.In conclusion, the professor in the listening part holds the opposite opinion about the topic in the reading material. She believes that the advantages of communal online encyclopedias carry more weight(这个表达好), although there are of course some drawbacks.
MM,写得很好啊,我挑不出啥语法之类的错误耶,写得虽然很简单,但看得出用词和短词之类的基本功能好,不像我写得罗里八锁的,我就想弱问一下,这个综合写作是一定要总分总的吗?我看好些范文是总分就行了的,如果不一定的话是不是用来凑字也不错呢。
BTW:你看了我的作文,就知道我水平有多弱了,所以给你批改的不到位,还请多见谅啊。。
7#
发表于 2012-9-4 06:05:11 | 只看该作者
明明在WORD里都有下划线或者记号,怎么贴到这里就都不见了呢,瀑布汗啊!
8#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-9-5 12:04:05 | 只看该作者
9.3 综合
TPO8
The topic is about the accuracy of Chevalier's long memoir. The reading part doubts its accuracy from three aspects, but the listening part supports it.


In the first place, the writer casts doubt on the wealth Cheavlier had by pointing out that he borrowed plenty of money from Swiss merchant. On the contrary, the speaker believes that the evidence talked in the reading part can be weaken by the reason that he could not transfer the wealth to money right now. So he borrowed money from Swiss merchant only for waiting the wealth to be converted to money to pay for those bills arising from parties and gambling.


In the second place, the passage says that the conversation recorded by Cheavlier between him and the famous writer Voltaire could not be accurate, since no one was able to remember all the details many years later. However, the professor in the lecture points out that Cheavilier wrote notes about the details of conversation at every night after their conversation. What is more, when Cheavilier wrote the memoir, he often refers to those notes.


In the third place, it is about the accuracy of the fact whether he escaped from a notorious prison. The passage refutes this point by saying that his political well-connected friends help them to be released. But the lecture says that there were also many other people who had more powerful friends want to go out of the prison, but they did not make it. Furthermore, there is evidence of government document show that after his the time he escaped, the ceil where he lived needed to be repaired. If the ceil was not broken because of him, the repair is not necessary.
In conclusion, the article was refuted by the lecture from three aspects to let the students know that the memoir of Cheavlier is pretty accurate.

9#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-9-5 12:10:04 | 只看该作者
9.3 独立
Do you agree that it is better to spend money on traveling and vacation than save money for the future.


When talking about the way in which money use, different people from various walks of life have different views about this. For instance, some are fond of saving them for a future unexpected event. Others may try to enjoy life by spending them on traveling and vacation. As for me, I would like to side with the latter part of people to use money for traveling around the world. Although there are millions of reasons for me to choose this choice, I would love to talk several major ones below.


First of all, traveling around the world is my dream since I was a little girl. For my part, as different persons have different features and senses, each city has its own attractions. Like, I love to go to Poland to feel the music of Chopin in the fall which is the most beautiful season there. I love the afternoon of Paris, drinking a bottle of wine or a cup of coffee at a same bar and seeing people walking on the street. I love the morning of Beijing, the capital of China. Getting up early, drinking Douzhi, a kind of Chinese traditional food, sitting quietly near a window under sunshine and feeling the peace in my heart is the most expected thing I want. For now, the only problem is that I do not have enough money. So as long as this condition is fulfilled, I will try to achieve those things talked about as soon as possible without hesitation.


On the contrary, some people, like my best friend Tracy, may disagree with me for this point of view, since money should be saved for a future emergency. I could not agree with this more for everyone is afraid of an unexpected future. However, for me, traveling around the world and enjoying the time I have now carry more weight than an uncertainty future accident.


All in all, spending money for vacation and traveling is the choice I will never change no matter what will happen even though I have to admit it that choice have drawbacks.
10#
发表于 2012-9-5 14:23:21 | 只看该作者


9.3 综合
TPO8
The topic is about the accuracy of Chevalier's long memoir. The reading part doubts its accuracy from three aspects, but the listening part supports it.


In the first place, the writer casts doubt on the wealth CheavlierChevalier had by pointing out that he borrowed plenty of money from Swiss merchant. On the contrary, the speaker believes that the evidence talked in the reading part can be weakened by the reason that he could not transfer the wealth to money right now. So he borrowed money from Swiss merchant only for waiting the wealth to be converted to money in order (此处为建议,以为to好多,加上in order 明确目的性)to pay for those bills arising from parties and gambling.


In the second place, the passage says that the conversation recorded by CheavlierChevalier between him and the famous writer Voltaire could not be accurate, since no one was able to remember all the details many years later. However, the professor in the lecture points out that CheavlierChevalier wrote notes about the details of conversation at every night after their conversation. What is more, when CheavlierChevalier wrote the memoir, he often refers to those notes.(最后一句时态不一致)


In the third place, it is about the accuracy of the fact whether he escaped from a notorious prison. The passage refutes this point by saying that his political well-connected friends help them him to be released. But the lecture says that there were also many other people who had more powerful friends wanting to go out of the prison, but they did not make it. Furthermore, there is evidence of government document showing that after his the timehe escaped, the ceiling where he lived needed to be repaired. If the ceiling was not broken because of by him, the repair is not necessary.
In conclusion, the article was refuted by the lecture from three aspects to let the students know that the memoir of CheavlierChevalier is pretty accurate.



意思比较全面,基本上把所以听力上的内容都写出来了,第二条原因就差Chevalier随从随他的证明。语法,词汇个别有些错误,可能是rose挑灯苦读时间紧任务大,没时间检查吧!不过总体上挺好的,rose的听力不错!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: TOEFL / IELTS


近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-1-24 17:37
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部