小兔爱twins的作文贴 7.23开始~ 求吐槽求拍砖

小兔爱twins

The professor is skeptical about the idea in the reading passage that a four-day workweek is beneficial for companies, the whole economy, and individual employees. He lists three main reasons as follow.

First of all, in the reading, the four-day workweek is likely to increase the profits of a company. On the contrary, the professor argues that the shortened workweek will probably cost a lot more. No matter how many days an employee works a week, the heath benefit is the same. In addition, more staff means the more computers and more office space, which requires additional cost.

On top of that, the professor refutes the claim in the passage that the unemployment rate would go down. He points out that the company will raise the expectation of the four-day employees, therefore they are likely to do the same volume of work as the they do in five days. Moreover, owing to the increased current jobs of the four-day workers, there will not be additional workers being hired.    

Finally, although the passage suggests a four- day workweek would enhance the quality of employees' life, the professor disagrees with this statements. He indicates that it is risky for a company to offer the option of working a four-day workweek, because it could reduce the quality of the employees life. Also, the professor adds that the four-day employees are most likely to lose job, and are less like to get a promotion.

小兔爱twins

The professor is skeptical about the idea in the reading passage that a four-day workweek is beneficial for companies, the whole economy, and individual employees. He lists three main reasons as follow.

First of all, in the reading, the four-day workweek is likely to increase the profits of a company. On the contrary, the professor argues that the shortened workweek will probably cost a lot more. No matter how many days an employee works a week, the heath benefit is the same. In addition, more staff means the more computers and more office space, which requires additional cost.

On top of that, the professor refutes the claim in the passage that the unemployment rate would go down. He points out that the company will raise the expectation of the four-day employees, therefore they are likely to do the same volume of work as the they do in five days. Moreover, owing to the increased current jobs of the four-day workers, there will not be additional workers being hired.    

Finally, although the passage suggests a four- day workweek would enhance the quality of employees' life, the professor disagrees with this statements. He indicates that it is risky for a company to offer the option of working a four-day workweek, because it could reduce the quality of the employees life. Also, the professor adds that the four-day employees are most likely to lose job, and are less like to get a promotion.  
8.27 ~~~ tpo1 重新开始咯~~

margrate

The professor is skeptical about the idea in the reading passage that a four-day workweek is beneficial for companies, the whole economy, and individual employees. He lists three main reasons as follow.

First of all, in the reading, the four-day workweek is likely to increase the profits of a company. On the contrary, the professor argues that the shortened workweek will probably cost a lot more. No matter how many days an employee works a week, the heath benefit is the same.（这里貌似和听力有些出入，可以再详细点） In addition, more staff means themore computers and more office space, which requires additional cost.

On top of that, the professor refutes the claim in the passage that the unemployment rate would go down. He points out that the company will raise the expectation of the four-day employees, therefore they are likely to do the same volume of work as the they do in five days. Moreover, owing to the increased current jobs of the four-day workers, there will not be additional workers being hired.    

Finally, although the passage suggests a four- day workweek would enhance the quality of employees' life, the professor disagrees with this statements. He indicates that it is risky for a company to offer the option of working a four-day workweek, because it could reduce the quality of the employees life.(这个点也有些出入) Also, the professor adds that the four-day employees are most likely to lose job, and are less like to get a promotion.  



感觉很好，很简练，听力内容再加强一点点会更好

小兔爱twins

独立写作 做运动还是读书看电影

Increasing focus comes to be attracted on the way people relax themselves. However, views are holding various opinions about this issue. On one hand, some people believe that watching a movie or reading a book is a better way to relax. On the other hand, some individuals prefer relaxing themselves by doing exercises. As far as I am concerned, the former holds water.

To begin with, reading a book or watching a moive in a quiet place creates a more chance people to have a good rest. That says, people may feel exhausted after a whole day work, and then doing physical exercises probably makes people more tired. However, reading a book or watching a movie in a placeful area enables people to refresh themselves mantally and physically. You can imagine that you are sitting in your soft sofa, enjoying the tasty coffee and the romantic movie, all of these help you calm down and relax in a elegant way.

Moreover, I think, there is no doubt that reading a books or watching a movie is not only best way to relax, but also an opportunity to broaden our horizon. For instance, the other day, my history teacher assisgned a paper to us. When I felt tired in writing paper and had no idea to move on, I chose some history books to read. From those books I get some useful information that can not be found in my text books, which really open my eyes. It was those books that helped me finish my paper quickly. In addition, reading those books release me from the pressure of writing paper.

Admittely, many people, in not most, are strong believer of the claim that doing physical exercises is the better to relax. They think by doing exericise people can keep fit and healthy, and thus they can feel relaxed. However, if we view this from different perspectives, we can see they seems to oversimplify the real situation. That say, Sometimes people are likely to get injured while doing physical exerises. For example, I often hear about one of my male friend get injuried while playing basketball. Their purpose is to relax themselves, however, it turn worse result.  

Taking into account what is discussed above, I've made no effort to subdue my opinion that reading a book or watching a movie is a better to relax.

fuzhengrui

小兔爱twins

The professor is skpetical about the idea in the passage that theChevalier distorted and invented many events in the memoir to make his life seem more exciting and glamorous than it really was. She lists three main reasons.

First of all, in the reading, the Chevalier borrowed a lot of money from Swiss merchant, which suggests that he is not very wealthy as he claimed in the memoir. On the contrary, the professor argues that the Chevalier is wealthy but he need to sell some properties to convert cash. So, before  the arrival of his cash, the Chevalier had to borrow some money from the merchant, which can not prove that he is poor.

On top of that, the professor refutes the claim in the reading that it is impossile for Chevalier to remember exact phrases from conversations held many years ago. She piont out that the Chevalier and Voltaire held conversation every night when they lived together, and the Chevalie worte down as many phrases he remembered after the conversation . Also, the Chevalier could recall the phrases years later.

Finally, although the reading suggests that the Chevalier bribed to escape the prison instead of breaking the ceiling and climbing through the roof, the professor disagrees with this idea. Because she says that the prisoners are so powerful, so it seemed that the Chevalier would not use bribe. In addition, after the Chevalier's escaping, the ceiling needed repairing, which indicates the Chevalier indeed broke the ceiling and ran away.

fuzhengrui

小兔爱twins

In this day and age, increasing focus comes to be attracted on the way of decision-making in a group. However, viewers are holding different opinion about this issue. On one hand, some people believe that successful leaders should make other parts of the decision-making process. On the other hand, there is an opposition among others who insist that successful leaders are supposed to monopolize the right of decision-making. As far as i am concerned, the former holds water.

To begin with, making the staff part of the decision-making process enable them to feel about the sense of belonging, which increase their passion for their work. That says, if the staff realize that they are an important part of a group, they are likely to try their best to finish the task. For instance, the company that I work in always get everyone invloved in decision making, and thus even Linda, a cleaner in our office, she always feels proud of being the one of the group and makes great effort to do her duty. In addition, the more they feel about the belongingness to a group, the better they can deal with an issue and the better achievement they can reach. Therefore, it is a wise choice for the leader to make employees feel about they are in part of the decision-making process.

What's more, I believe, there is no doubt that making the employees part of the decision-making process promotes relationship between the leader and the group members. A leader, who is willing to listen to idea from others and adopt thier ideas, always make the group members feel respected, and the group members will then become closer to the leader. For instance,  I am working as a department  minister in the college Student Union. I often let my group member speak out their suggestions about a task, discuss with each other, and then come up with a final plan which is admitted by everyone. In this way, we are working in a good atompsphere.

Taking into account what is discussed above, I've make no effort to subdue my opinion that an effective and sucessful leader is supposed to make others feel that they are part of decision making.

这篇好难写。。。。。 严重超时！！！

面具小姐

9.4 独立 改

红色错误 绿色建议 蓝色吐槽 高亮精彩

In this day and age, increasing focus comes to be attractedon the way of decision-making in a group (这个句子结构怪怪的). However,viewers are holding different opinions about this issue. On one hand, some peoplebelieve that successful leaders should make other parts of the decision-makingprocess (other parts of 指什么？看不太懂这句的意思). Onthe other hand, there is an opposition among others who insist that successfulleaders are supposed to monopolizethe right of decision-making. As far as i am concerned, the former holds water.

To begin with, making the staff (完了 我写了stuff..我说感觉怪怪的…) (makethem join in part of 还是 make thema part of直接make +part说不通呐。。)part of the decision-making process enables themto feel about the sense of belonging, which increase their passion for their work. That says, if the staff realize that they are animportant part of a group, they are likely to try their best to finish the task(发现我只会用assignment). Forinstance, the company that I work in always get everyone invloved (involved) in decision making, and thus even Linda, a cleaner in ouroffice, she always feels proud of being the one of thegroup and makes great effort to do her duty. In addition, the more they feelabout the belongingness to a group, the better they can deal with an issue andthe better achievement they can reach. Therefore, it is a wise choice for theleader to make employees (又发现我只会用staff了T^T) feel about (that) they are in part of the decision-making process.

What's more, I believe, there is no doubt (感觉有no doubt 了可以不用I believe 既然都毫无疑问了是吧。。)that makingthe employees (和上一段一样的结构，可以换个表达) partof the decision-making process promotes relationship between the leader and thegroup members. A leader, who is willing to listen to ideas fromothers and adopt thier(their) ideas(listento and adopt ideas from others),always makes the group members feel respected, and the group memberswill then become closer to the leader. For instance, I am working as a departmentminister in the college Student Union. I often let my group members speakout their suggestions about a task, discuss with each other, and then come upwith a final plan which is admitted by everyone. In this way, we are working ina good atompsphere.(atmosphere)(这段的例子好像和上段的例子矛盾了啊，是以前读大学的时候发生的事吧？现在不是工作了吗？那这段的时态可能要改下)

Taking into account what is discussed above, I've make(made) no effort to subdue my opinion (有这样的表达吗?subdue opinions?感觉怪怪的这前半句呢。。) thatan effective and sucessful (sucessful) leader is supposed to make others feel thatthey are in part of decision making.

小兔爱twins

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The most important problems in today's world will be solved in our lifetime.

Increasing focus comes to be attracted on the development of the society. However, viewers are holding different opinions about the issue whether most important problem in today's world will be solved in our lifetime. As far as I am concerned, as our human think of our own benefit and comfort first, the most important problems in today's world are likely not to be solved in our lifetime.

To begin with, war has been the biggest problem in the world for centuries. From past to now, there have been countless war happened in the world. Whether people fight for power, resources or racial and religious differences, it seems that human are not able to living together in harmony. The Second World War are supposed to be 'the war to end all the wars', however since then there have been still many wars happened and the wars seem never stop. In my view, it is extremely hard to change the human nature which is the essential factor leading to the war, therefore, it is impossile that world peace will be achieved in our lifetime.

What's more, with the development of industry, contamination also becomes a worldwise problem which has no effective solution. Facing our own comfort and profits, we are not likely to stop destroying the environment. For instance, when thinking about the convenience, we are not willing to give up the cars or use less electricity or gas. Also in order to release the economy burden, we are not prepared to pay the extra costs for the more expensive but environmental-friendly energy. Factories which bring thier own huge profits have discharge gas and liquid to the surrounding environment. Nations are also unwilling to slow down the pace of development to care about the evironment. While there have been numerous confereces and meetings discuss about the tackling pollution, and also been a great of laws to protect the environment, very little has really been achieved.

Taking into account what is discussed above, I will make no effort to subdue my opinion that the most important problem in today's world are not likely to be solved in our lifetime.