蓝色为意见或建议 高亮为精彩 绿色为总结 红色为错误
The professor is skeptical about the usage of the great house stated in the reading passage. He lists 3 reason to refute the idea in the reading passage.
First of all, in the reading, the Chaco strutures house hundreds of people because it looks like the apartment building today. On the contrary, the professor say that the greatly house can't hold many people to live for the lack of fire place inside the house, which can not even satisfy the daily cooking for hundres of peolpe live there.
On top of that, the reading indicates that the great house is used to store maize. However, the professor asserts that neither the maize nor the containers of the maize can be found in the great house, which is contradicts to the idea that the house is used for storatge.
Finally, the reading(用passage好点吧??) says the Chaco strutures are used as ceremonial center. While in the lecture, the professor tells the students the excavations of the mound reveals deposits containing stone, sand and structure tools as well, which indicates the place may be a trash heap at that time. Moreover, the pots are probably for the use of regular cooking for the workers. So it can be ceremonial centers as the reading says.
|