小兔爱twins的作文贴 7.23开始~ 求吐槽求拍砖

小兔爱twins

The professor is skeptical about the idea in the reading passage that the fule-cell engines are ideal alternatives to the incomsution engines. She lists three main reasons.

First of all, in the reading, the fule-cell engine relies on the hydrogen, which can be easily available and renewable. However, the professor states that only the pure liquid hydrogen can be used for the fuel-cell engines, and only in very cold condition can people get the hydrogen, which refutes the idea stated in the passage that the resource of fuel-cell engines are easily accessiable.  
811 综合

On top of that, the reading says the fuel-cell engines bring less pollution than the internal-combustion do. On the contrary, the professoe assert even though the hydrogen-based fuel cars do not cause pollution problems, the process of producing the pure liquid hydrogen lead to the pollution problems by buring coal and oil.

Finally, the passage presents that it cost people less monry to operate fuel-cell engines, which contradicts to the idea in the lecture. The professor points out that the fuel-cell engines is made of platinum, a very rare and expensive metal, without which the chemecial reaction will not occur and thus the cars will not powered. Therefore, the fuel-cell engines is not economically competitive as the reading says.

fairyfinger

The professor is skeptical about the idea in the reading passage that the fule-cell engines are ideal alternatives to the incomsution/ inconsumptious engines. She lists three main reasons.

First of all, in the reading, the fule-cell engine relies on the hydrogen, which can be easily available and renewable. However, the professor states that only the pure liquid hydrogen can be used for the fuel-cell engines, and only in very cold condition can people get the hydrogen, which refutes the idea stated in the passage that the resource of fuel-cell engines are easily accessiable/ accessible.

On top of that, the reading says the fuel-cell engines bring less pollution than the internal-combustion do. On the contrary, the professoe asserts even though the hydrogen-based fuel cars do not cause pollution problems, the process of producing the pure liquid hydrogen lead to the pollution problems by buring/burning coal and oil.

Finally, the passage presents that it costs people less monry to operate fuel-cell engines, which contradicts to the idea in the lecture. The professor points out that the fuel-cell engines is made of platinum, a very rare and expensive metal, without which the chemecial reaction will not occur and thus the cars will not be powered. Therefore, the fuel-cell engines is not economically competitive as the reading says.
要点和关键词都写下来了，就是要注意一下单复数和拼写错误～～

小兔爱twins

The professor is skeptical about the methods mentioned in the reading passage to stop the spread of the cane toad in Australia. She listes three main reasons.

First of all, in the reading, building a national fence can prevent the cane toad from moving ionto ohter uncolonized places. On the contrary, the professor agures that the young cane tones and the eggs of cane toad are found in the river and the stream, which can flow to the other places and then establish the population.

On top of that, the professor refutes the claim in the reading that with the help of volunteers the cane toads can be effectively reduce. She points out that many untrained volunteer are likely to kill the native frogs which are even endangered, because they are not able to tell  the frogs apart from the toads.

Finally, although the reading passage suggests that the disease-causing virus can control the populations of the cane toad, the professor disagree with the idea. She indicate some toads are transported to the Central and South American continents and then the native toads will be infected by the virus, which cause the decline of the populations. In addition Americans cane toads are a vital part of the ecosystem. Therefore this practice will do harm to the whole ecosystem of the Central and South America.


817 综合~~~

ykhjy

8.17 综合修改~~
蓝色good  黄色需修改，红色我改的， 绿色总结
The professor is skeptical about the methods mentioned in the reading passage to stop the spread of the cane toad in Australia. She listes three main reasons.【简洁明了，学习了。】

First of all, in the reading, building a national fence can prevent the cane toad from moving ionto ohter uncolonized places. On the contrary, the professor agures that the young cane tones and the eggs of cane toad are found in the river and the stream, which【这个which 指代啥？可以指代the young cane tones么？】 can flow to the other places and then establish the population.

On top of that, the professor refutes the claim in the reading that with the help of volunteers the cane toads can be effectively reduce. She points out that many untrained volunteer are likely to kill the native frogs which are even【文中没特别说明额，不过问题不大】 endangered, because they are not able to tell  the frogs apart from the toads.

Finally, although the reading passage suggests that the disease-causing virus can control the populations of the cane toad, the professor disagree with the idea. She indicates some toads【animals】 are transported to the Central and South American continents and then the native toads will be infected by the virus, which will【时态对应】 cause the decline of the populations. In addition Americans cane toads are a vital part of the ecosystem. Therefore this practice will do harm to the whole ecosystem of the Central and South America.
兔子综合真厉害。。我很多细节都来不及记下来。。有什么方法么，真的多练习就行？

小兔爱twins

819
The professor is skeptical about the idea in the reading passages that the number of birds are reduced by growth of human population and the increasing in agricultrue and the pesticide. In the lecture she lists three main reasons.

First of all, in the reading, the increasing population and settlements of human cause  the birds's natural habitats disappearing. On the contrary, the professor agures that actually there are better and larger habitats for birds due to urbanization.  In addition, not all species are decreasing. Virtually, some people even complain about the increase of some species of birds, such as seagulls, pigeons.

On top of that, the professor refutes the claim in the reading passage that the agricultural activities result in the futher destrucion od birds' habits. She points out that now tge new and more produtive crops are developed, and there is no need to convert more wilderness areas for agricultural use. SO the bird populations will not continue to deline.

Finally, although the reading passage suggests that the ues of chemical pesticides will do harm to the food chain for birds where they can harm birds, the professor disagrees with this idea. She indication people become awareness of the disadvantages of using pesticides, therefore there are two chages in killing the pest. First, new and less toxic pesticides are invented, and second people are now developing a kind of crops which have genetic resitance to defense the pest, which can keep the stability of the food chain.    

今天十足是超时了写了25分钟！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！好捞！！！！！！！！！！！！ ！！！
听的都写居然发现时间不够！！ 打字很是问题 。。。。

sarahpx

首先，小兔勿捞~~偶也写了25分钟……今天的听力记笔记很累有没有！
819
The professor is skeptical about the idea in the reading passages（passage） that the number of birds are reduced（这里用被动有点怪，the number 对应的应该是单数吧） by growth of human population and/， the increasing in agricultrue and the pesticide. In the lecture， she lists three main reasons.

First of all, in the reading, the increasing population and settlements of human cause  the birds's natural habitats disappearing. On the contrary, the professor agures that actually there are better and larger habitats for birds due to urbanization.  In addition, not all species are decreasing. Virtually, some people even complain about the increase of some species of birds, such as seagulls（厉害哦）, pigeons.

On top of that, the professor refutes the claim in the reading passage that the agricultural activities result in the futher destrution on birds' habits. She points out that now the new and（不用这个and吧） more produtive crops are developed, and there is no need to convert more wilderness areas for agricultural use. SO the bird populations will not continue to deline.

Finally, although the reading passage suggests that the use of chemical pesticides will do harm to the food chain for birds where they can harm birds, the professor disagrees with this idea. She indication people become awareness of the disadvantages of using pesticides, therefore there are two changes in killing the pest. First, new and less toxic pesticides are invented, and second people are now developing a kind of crops which have genetic resitance（resistance？） to defense the pest, which can keep the stability of the food chain.    

小兔的paraphrase能力很好哈，听力也很强，很多细节都抓到了。就是拼写错误有点小多哈

小兔爱twins

The profeesor asks a buzzer named Bill to tell the students the idea in the reading passage that buzzers have a negative effect on consumers is totally misleading. Bill listes three main reasons.

First of all, in the reading, the buzzers are not always telling the truth and they are just paid for praising a product. On the contrary, Bill argures that instead of hiring an actress read some lines in advertisements, the advertising companies often hire people who have used the products and feel good about them. Although they are paid, they are still telling the truth.

On top of that, Bill refutes about the claim in the reading that people will believe whatever the buzzers say. He points out that actually people tend to ask lots of questions about the product, such as price service, if the buzzer can't answer their question, they are not likely to buy the product. So the buzzers offer the opportunity for people to know the product well.

Finally, although the passage suggests that buzzing will probably do harm to social relationship, Bill disagrees with this idea. He indicates if the products are bad, the companies can not recruite buzzers. In addition, people who try buzz products are going to have a good experience, because buzzers is trustful and opened to people.

235852140

错误建议
The profeesor(拼写错了，改professor) asks a buzzer named Bill to tell （上课嘛，觉得explain或者teach一类的更好）the students the idea in the reading passage that buzzers have a negative effect on consumers is totally misleading.
（这个很长的句子，简化了是the professor ask sb to tell sb sth.  我画线的部分是sth的具体内容，很显然，它是个句子，应该用that引导一下。改成：…to tell the students that the idea that…is totally misleading. ）Bill listes three main reasons(+as follows).

First of all, in the reading, the buzzers are not always telling the truth and they are just paid for praising a product. （翻译：在文中，buzzer不说实话。听起来很奇怪哦。建议说：the reading passage claims that...之类的，表明是一种观点而已，而不是事实。）On the contrary, Bill argures that instead of hiring an actress read some lines in advertisements, the advertising companies often hire people who have used the products and feel good about them. Although they are paid, they are still telling the truth.

On top of that, Bill refutes about the claim in the reading that people will believe whatever the buzzers say. He points out that actually people tend to ask lots of questions about the product, such as price （+and）service,（前面已经是一句话，这里必须有连词，或把逗号改句号。） if the buzzer can't answer their question（s）, they are not likely to buy the product. So the buzzers offer the opportunity for people to know the product well.

Finally, although the passage suggests that buzzing will probably do harm to social relationship, Bill disagrees with this idea. He indicates if the products are bad, the companies can not recruite buzzers. （听的很准嘛）In addition, people who try buzz products are going to have a good experience, because buzzers is trustful and opened to people.（because后面的内容才是结果，前面的是原因，是因为人们有好的体验，所以才will end up being trustful and open to people.）

亲听的很准确，重要信息点都写到了。注意一下个别小错误和表达问题会更好。加油~

小兔爱twins

The proffessor is skeptical about the idea in the passage that planting genetically modified tree brings a number of benefits. She lists three main reasons.

First of all, in the reading, the genetically modified trees are more likely to survive than non-modified trees. On the contrary, the professors argues that although the genetically modified trees can resist some problems, such as pests, it can not ensure the survival of the whole speices. In addition, if the climate changes or new pest engages in, the genetically modified trees will likely be completely wagged out.

On top of that, the professor refutes the claim in the reading that genetically modified trees promise to bring a number of economic benefits to those who grow them. She points out that the seeds of genetically modified trees can charge tree farmers much more than the ones of unmodified trees. Also, farmers who collect the seeds and plant the new tree have to pay the company every time they plant.

Finally, although the passage suggests that the use of genetically modified trees can prevent overexploitation of wild trees, the professor disagree with this idea. She indicates that  when genetically modified trees are planted among the natural trees, they will out compete the native trees for resource. Eventually, crowd out the nature trees.

pinkyhuayin

The proffessor is skeptical about the idea in the passage that planting genetically modified tree brings a number of benefits. She lists three main reasons.

开头的这段是模板，当然不是不可以，只是不够切题，建议多准备集中开头吧。skeptical ，个人理解，只是表怀疑，但是文章是明确的反驳，而不仅仅是怀疑，可以用dispute 一类吧

First of all, in the reading, the genetically modified trees are more likely to survive than non-modified trees. On the contrary, the professors argues that although the genetically modified trees can resist some problems, such as pests, it can not ensure the survival of the whole speices.这句表意，我没理解，尤其是whole speices ，不知道指什么滴？  In addition, if the climate changes or new pest engages in, the genetically modified trees will likely be completely wagged out.原文应该是wipe out，表消灭的意思。

特别标出的这个it，是因为和前文数不一样，我也看到了你后面有用 复数的地方。我写的时候也有点纠结是用单，还是用复数，其实单数应该也可以，表示一类，但是一定要前后文统一。就这个文章，还是用复数保险一些吧。

On top of that, the professor refutes the claim in the reading that genetically modified trees promise to bring a number of economic benefits to those who grow them. She points out that the seeds of genetically modified trees can charge tree farmers much more than the ones of unmodified trees. Also, farmers who collect the seeds and plant the new tree have to pay the company every time they plant.


这段的点写的最详细了，其他两段还有可以补充的细节，建议楼主在听听，自己把细节加进去，可以让文章更丰满些。

Finally, although although 用作让步的话，是表示认可的，后面用反驳的话，建议直接用转折句型 the passage suggests that the use of genetically modified trees can prevent overexploitation of wild trees, however\while  the professor disagree with this idea. She indicates that  when genetically modified trees are planted among the natural trees, they will out compete the native trees for resource.and Eventually, crowd out the nature trees.最后这句没有主语，可以和前面一句连起来