fairy作文贴 每日练习ING

fairyfinger

In the lecture, the professor believes that the cane toads population in Australia could not be easily curved as the passage suggests. This is because the methods proved in the reading is likely to be unsuccessful or cause unwanted damage.

First, young toads and toad eggs usually live to the water. The passage indicates that building a national fence will help prevent toads from moving to un-colonized parts in Australia, and thereby stop harming to native ecosystem. However, the professor points out that despite of the fence, rivers and streams will still carry young toads and toad eggs to the other side, where the toads can populate. Therefore, building a national fence will not be as effective as the passage says.

Second, native frogs will also be destroyed by volunteers. According to the passage, cane toads can be caught by volunteers with simple tramp or hand. The professor admits that organizing volunteers to destroy the toads may work, yet that action will undoubtedly cause harm on native frogs who are too young and fragile, and who are also easily caught by the traps. Undermining frog population will harm the ecosystem in Australia. Thus, the lecturer disputes the second method provided by the passage.

Third, the consequence of developing a disease-causing virus is infecting a number of reptiles and amphibians, who, if transplanted in US, will surely harm the original toads there. More importantly, as the toads are native and vital to the Central and South America, the whole ecosystem will suffer if the toads are destroyed. The professor therefore oppose the passage in the point that developing a virus is useful in controlling the toads' population.

In sum, the passage offers three methods to control toads' spreading in Australia, yet the professor refutes that none of them can be successful and gives her own proofs.

fairyfinger

8.18
TPO16

In the lecture, the professor disagrees with the passage that the science of archaeology is facing serious problems in Britain. She ponits out that British government has adopted a series of policies in archaeology, which improved its archaeological situation in all three aspects mentioned in the passage.

First, before establishing any new buidings, the archaeological value of the building has to be examined. According to the passage, the builders often uncovered archaeologically valuable sites. Yet the professor asserts that if a site has valuable articrafts, then archeaologists and local government officials will work together to make a proper plan - either to dig around the site or to excavate properly before building. That directly contradicts what the passage says.

Second, contructional companies will pay for the archaeological research. The lecturer claims that instead of government, the constructional companies will give financial support for initial excavations of the sites where they plan to build. Thus, archaeologists can investigate a handful of interesting sites with enough fundings. Therefore, the professor disputes the passage in the point that financial support for archaeologists was inadquate.

Third, the new guideline has created many new jobs for expert archaeologists. The professor suggests that many more jobs have been created at all stages of the achaeological process, namely  examing archaeological value of the sites, planning preservation methods, analysing the articrafts, processing the datas and writing essays. As a result, the jobs provided in archaeology has reached its highest number ever in Britain. Thus, it's not as difficult to have a career in archaeology as the passage indicates.

In sum, the passage asserts that archaeology in Britain is facing big difficulties, yet the prefessor refutes that opinion in three perspectives by explaining a new guideline adopted in Britain.

winnie98

批改8.18
TPO16

In the lecture, the professor disagrees with the passage(professor不同意的是文章的观点,而不是文章, 改成the viewpoint in the passage更好 ) that the science of archaeology is facing serious problems in Britain. She ponits out that British government has adopted a series of policies in archaeology, which improved its archaeological situation in all three aspects mentioned in the passage(lecture,是在lecture中提的新政).
First, before establishing any new buidings, the archaeological value of the building has to be examined. According to the passage, the builders often uncovered archaeologically valuable sites. Yet the professor asserts that if a site has valuable articrafts, then archeaologists and local government officials will work together to make a proper plan - either to dig around the site or to excavate properly before building. That directly contradicts what the passage says.

Second, contructional(construction) companies will pay for the archaeological research. The lecturer claims that instead of government, the constructional companies will give financial support for initial excavations of the sites where they plan to build. Thus, archaeologists can investigate a handful of interesting sites with enough fundings. Therefore, the professor disputes the passage in the point(the point in the passage) that financial support for archaeologists was inadquate.

Third, the new guideline has created many new jobs for expert archaeologists. The professor suggests that many more jobs have been created at all stages of the achaeological process, namely  examing archaeological value of the sites, planning preservation methods, analysing the articrafts, processing the datas and writing essays. As a result, the jobs provided in archaeology has reached its highest number ever in Britain. Thus, it's not as difficult to have a career in archaeology as the passage indicates.

In sum, the passage asserts that archaeology in Britain is facing big difficulties, yet the prefessor refutes that opinion in three perspectives by explaining a new guideline adopted in Britain.


整体思路清晰，details给的也很好。
注意是point/viewpoint in the reading passage,不要写反。


继续加油O(∩_∩)O

fairyfinger

8.20
Your job has more effect on your happiness than your social life does.

Which one brings you more happiness, your work or social activities? Different people holds varied attitudes: some workaholics find their jobs challenging and meaningful, which attracts them to dedicate most of their time in them; while other hedonist insist that the real pleasure in life lies in people's interaction with friends and relatives. As far as I'm concerned, working give me more happiness.

It is my work that consistently substantiate me with new knowledges and informations. In order to finish projects successfully, one should not only gather necessary information, but also learn more knowledge and technological skills. For example, working in TV station, I sometimes have to watch many foreign television reality shows and analyze the process, budget and target audience of them. My english skill improved and my knowledge about television shows increased after finishing the work. In other words, managing tasks in one's work makes one become more and more professional in his field. For me, seeing myself progress day by day is really pleasant.

The result of works makes my life meaningful to other people. Every job has its unique significance: social workers offer help for underprivileged people; teachers equipped their students with knowledge; artists inspire and relief the public's mental world. Unlike that gained in social activities, the happiness offered by jobs are more profound. To be more specific, it makes people happy not because of fun or relaxation, but the feeling of self-realization and being significant to the world. Thus, the happiness of job is more enduring and worth pursuing for me.    

Admittedly, most social activities can bring instant happiness for people. And it thus can recharge people with more energy: watching films or videos makes us relax; attending concert or clubs with friends excites us; talking with parents refresh our minds and gives us confidence. Yet the happiness brought by most social interactions cannot last long - it disappears soon after the activity ends.

In sum, I believe that jobs can bring people more happiness than social activities in that it fulfilled life with knowledge and significance. On the other hand, the enjoyment of social life is ephemeral.

eone1025

不好意思啊上班族比较慢

Which one brings you more happiness, your work or social activities? Different people hold varied attitudes: some workaholics find their jobs challenging and meaningful that attracts them to dedicate most of their time to them（dedicate to这个搭配比较常见，另，这是一个从句，你用分号的话就表示是另外一个句子了）, while other hedonist insist that the real pleasure in life lies in people's interaction with friends and relatives. As far as I'm concerned, working gives me more happiness. job offers me more happiness（我觉得这样写会不会好一点，以前上xdf的时候老师说尽量避免give啊之类的词的使用，个人意见）.

It is my work that consistently substantiate me with new knowledge and information（我隐约记得这两个都是不可数的，但是这句话有点复杂是要表达工作提高了我的知识面吗？）. In order to finish projects successfully, one should not only gather necessary information, but also learn more knowledge and technological skills. For example, working in TV station, sometimes I have to（为什么是不得不） watch many foreign television reality shows and analyze the process, budget and target audience of them（看show不能够看到人家的具体预算吧??应该是要再去调查他们的资料吧）. My English skill got improved and my knowledge about television shows increased after finishing the work. When my job was done, I have my English skill improved and acquired more acquaintance of television shows.（我觉得改成这样会更好） In other words, managing（在这里用这个词有点语意不明） tasks in one's work makes one become more and more professional in the field.（可以讲一下快乐是因为这个原因，再接后面你的个人观点）For me, seeing myself progress day by day is really pleasant.

The result of works makes my life meaningful to other people. Every job has its unique significance: social workers offer help for underprivileged people; teachers equipped their students with knowledge; artists inspire and relief the public's mental world. Unlike that gained from social activities, the happiness offered by jobs is more profound. To be more specific, it makes people happy not because of fun or relaxation, but the feeling of self-realization and being significant to the world. Thus, the happiness of job is more enduring and worth pursuing for me.

Admittedly, most social activities can bring instant happiness for people. And it thus can recharge people with more energy: watching films or videos makes us relax; attending concert or clubs with friends excites us; talking with parents refresh our minds and gives us confidence. Yet the happiness brought by most social interactions cannot last long - it disappears soon after the activity ends.

In sum, I believe that jobs can bring people more happiness than social activities in that it fulfilled life with knowledge and significance. On the other hand, the enjoyment of social life is ephemeral.


要注意细节方面的问题，如果其他方面都很好这个细节可能会影响你的得分哦。
思路方面我觉得很好了，第二段的表述可能需要简练精确一些。

fairyfinger

TPO19

The lecturer disputes the reading passage which asserts that buzzers are not reliable and should be banned. He explains according to his personal experience that the passage is misleading and will leave wrong impression on consumers.

First, buzzers tell truth. The passage suggests that buzzers lie to consumers because they are paid to praise the product. However, the lecturer holds that buzzers, although paid for what they say, convey correct information about the product according to their usage about it. For instance, the speaker thinks the service of the phone he is buzzing is really great. This is one point the lecture contradicts the passage.

Second, consumers do not believe in whatever buzzers say. Actually, they ask a lot of questions about the price, service and how long can the product lasts. And if the answers are not satisfying, they would not buy it. That directly contradicts to the passage which states that the consumers are not on guard and will accept all claims of buzzers.

Third, buzzers will raise the trust among people. A company's ability to recruit buzzers shows the good quality and reliability of its products. Thus, people who buy the products will have a good experience, and thereby become more trustful and open to other people. So buzzing will not lead to spread of mistrust and the expectation of dishonesty.

In sum, the passage displays that the new advertising method 'buzzing' should be banned, yet the lecturer refutes the three points listed in the passage and gives his own proofs.

浅吟天

黄色模版加好的，绿色批注红色我改的

The lecturer disputes the reading passage which asserts that buzzers are not reliable and should be banned. He explains according to his personal experience that the passage is misleading and will leave（a）wrong impression on consumers.

First, buzzers tell truth. The passage suggests that buzzers lie to consumers because they are paid to praise the product. However, the lecturer holds that buzzers, although paid for what they say, convey correct information about the product according to their usage about it. For instance, the speaker thinks the service of the phone he is buzzing is really great. This is one point the lecture contradicts the passage.

Second, consumers do not believe in whatever buzzers say. Actually, they ask a lot of questions about the price, service and how long can the product lasts. And if the answers are not satisfying, they would not buy it. That directly contradicts（换个词呢） to the passage which states that the consumers are not on guard and will accept all claims of buzzers.

Third, buzzers will raise the trust among people. A company's ability to recruit buzzers shows the good quality and reliability of its products. Thus, people who buy the products will have a good experience, and thereby become more trustful and open to other people. So buzzing will not lead to spread of mistrust and the expectation of dishonesty.

In sum, the passage displays that the new advertising method 'buzzing' should be banned, yet the lecturer refutes the three points listed in the passage and gives his own proofs.



认真看了，我。。。挑不出毛病了。。。

很好，点都到了，关键是写的很还原原文。

请问这是一遍听出了的结果吗？你的笔记记的好棒听的真的很细！

fairyfinger

For future career success, is relate well to other people more important than studying hard at school?

For most university students, it's hard to make a balance between social activities and study. A question that usually confuses us is that what proportion of our time should we give to these two parts? Some believe that communication skill is far more important since the help from others is critical to success; while others hold that students should study hard at school so as to acquire the knowledge and skills which are essential in their career development. Both sides bear merits, I think it depends on what one's future job is.

There are positions which put great emphasis on communication crafts, namely diplomat, PR and salesman. Others' colaboration for people on these jobs counts the most: a diplomat has to meditate between different countries; a PR tries best to promote a good company image to the public and cooperators; salesman make every effort to sell his product to consumers. If they just sit at home and study alone, it's hard for them to have an opportunity to communicate with others, let along practicing and improving their social skills. Therefore, for students who want to find a job in careers which appreciate broad association and excellent social manner and skills, they had better spend more time on practicing how to relate well to others.

Yet for people who plan to get a position in art or IT industry, upgrading their professional skills is far more helpful. Considering those famous artists, they communicate with others through paintings, music, writting and performance instead of oral words. Outstanding artists like the Dutch painter Vincent Van Gogh, German musician Wagner and English writer Alexander Pop all find it hard to talk with others properly. However, their poor communication ability do not a bit affect them creating abundant masterpieces which gained respect worldwide. Likewise, technological workers work with machines instead of people. Thus, it is the quality of their works, but not communication crafts, that decides their professional skills. In that sense, studying hard at school is more important for students specialized in art and IT field.

In sum, both relating well to other people and studying hard at school are helpful to one's career success in the future, yet one must make more effort on the one that is more valued in his future position.

sherryzhangh

For most university students, it'shard to make a balance between social activities and study. A question thatusually confuses us is that what proportion of our time should we give to thesetwo parts? Some believe that communication skill is far more important sincethe help from others is critical to success; while others hold that studentsshould study hard at school so as to acquire the knowledge and skills which areessential in their career development. Both sides bear merits; I think itdepends on what one's future job is.

There are positions which （that ）put great emphasis on communication crafts, namely diplomat, PR and salesman. Others' collaboration for people on these jobscounts the most(这句话看不懂，是一种固定用法吗？): a diplomathas to meditate between different countries; a PR tries best to promote a goodcompany image to the public and cooperators; salesman make every effort to sellhis product to consumers. If they just sit at home and study alone, it's hardfor them to have an opportunity to communicate with others, let alongpracticing and improving their social skills. Therefore, for students who wantto find a job in such careers, which appreciate broad association and(as well as ) excellentsocial manner and skills, they had better spend (devote) more time onpracticing how to relate well to others.

Yet for people who plan to get aposition in art or IT industry, upgrading their professional skills is far morehelpful. Considering those famous artists, they communicate with others throughpaintings, music, writing and performance instead of oral words. Outstandingartists like the Dutch painter Vincent Van Gogh, German musician Wagner andEnglish writer Alexander Pop all find it hard to talk with others properly.However, their poor communication ability does not a bit affect them creating abundant masterpieces which that gained respectworldwide. Likewise, technological workers work with machines instead ofpeople. Thus, it is the quality of their works, but not communication crafts,that (定于从句 that 一般在句中， 而which可以用逗号分开)decides their professional skills. In that sense, studying hard at schoolis more important for students specialized in art and IT field.

In sum, both relating well to otherpeople and studying hard at school are helpful to one's career success in thefuture, yet one must make more effort on the one that is more valued in hisfuture position.

fairyfinger

8.25
 TPO23
In the lecture, the professor asserts that we still do not know the real cause of yellow cedar declination. He disputes the passage in that none of the three hypothesis presented is adquate.

First, the cedar bark beetle only attack cedars that already damaged their sack. According to the lecture, healthy cedars are more resistant than many other trees to bark beetles, and those beetles attacks onlu cedars which are no longer able to grow. Therefore, cedar bark beetle is not the fundamental cause of cedar decrease. That directly contrasts what the passage indicates.

Second, there's no brown bear in costal islands near northwestern North America. The professor points out that although there's no bear in the islands, the cedars there was also declined as that in mainland northwestern North America. Thus, the bears are not the cause of overall decline of cedar population. That is another part where the lecture contradicts what the passage says.

Third, the passage suggests that climate change causes the change in the timing of cedar root growth, which may leads to root damage and population decrease. However, the lecturer claimes that cedars in relatively higher elevation in colder places are not declining at a speed which those in lower elevation with warmer temperature do. Thus, climate is not responsible for undermining the cedar population in North America.

In sum, the passage listed three possible explainations for cedar decline in northwestern North America, yet the professor says that none of them is sufficient and gives his own proofs.