huluhulufei 的作业贴~

瓜瓜不瓜

7.24 综合TPO 15
高亮精彩 红色错误 蓝色建议
The reading passage holds the point that cane toad in Australia can be deracinated by three measures. However, the professor in the lecture points out that these three measures will not stop the spread of the cane toad, but cause serious environment problems. He（小错误哦，是she吧？后面同理啦） gives three specific reasons to support his idea.

First, the reading claims that by building a national fence, the spread of the toad will be prevented. On the contrary, the professor argues that fence won't have such（+an建议加） effect. The young toads and toad's eggs are always in streams and rivers, which are flowing almost（always？）. Therefore, it's reasonable that young toads and eggs will be carried to get through the fence. In this way, the professor's statement disproves its counterpart in the reading.

Second, the professor concedes that volunteers will kill a large amount of cane toads. However, the untrained volunteers have little ability to identify toad and frogs. In other words, they'll have difficulty（+in） distinguishing the two species, especially the young ones. Hence, they'll kill many national frogs, which may be endangered. In this way, the professor proves the statement in the reading untenable.

Third, the reading maintains that the disease-causing virus will control the cane toad populations. And the virus will harm the cane toads only. However, the professor points out this statement indefensible by the fact that there are still reptiles and amphibian species infected, though not harmed by the virus, will be transported to other places such as South American. Once these animals arrive on America, the virus they carry will be a great damage to the local cane toad. The virus may cause ecosystem disaster either.

HULU同学好，我是志愿来批你综合的瓜瓜哈哈

我是按照我之前写的综合批的哈，你写的很好，要点细节都全了。
建议加一个结尾哦。

guoyang88

7.24独立修改

Nowadays people have to make great effort striving in this highly competitive society. It’s common to have conflicts between whatever colleagues and friends. However, is it a kind of reason to be rude to others in order to eliminate the conflicts? I don’t think so. From my perspective of view, I agree with the statement that there’s never a reason to be rude to another person. The reasons are as follows.


To begin with, others will look down on us if we are rude, and no matter what the reason is. To be polite, kind, and warm-hearted is a reflection of our well-educated background, social status, and great manners. Have you ever seen a man dressed up , saying bestial [nasty ]words? The answer is obviously not. Rude 【Rudeness】 has a magic power, which makes a strong obstacle between people and their friends. As long as one knows another’s rude personality, he’ll think of him impolite and lack of education. Such feelings will spread among his social network. Unluckily, no one would like to treat him as true friends. In this way, rude is dramatically a terrible tool to make others look down on us.In addition, it is rude that break relationships. Friends are those who can help us when we are in need of a helping hand. No one can deny that there’re conflicts among even [even among] the best friends. Someone chooses rude [rudeness or being rude] as their way to solve the conflicts. However, it always results in a terrible circumstance—broken friendship. Rude words will hurt others, making no use to the origin of the problem. What’s more, only parents can forgive you without any reason. Even among best friends, there’re still some rules that can’t offend. Obviously, the relationships between people are complex and convoluted.What’s more, it is rude that makes things worse especially works. For example, I have ever been a computer company for internship 【for】one summer, and was designated as a member of a team, which took the responsibility of developing the appearance of a new computer type. It impressed me strongly because of the meetings that the team held. Each time we started to discuss about a design, those who opposed it said tons of rude words to those who supported it. Therefore, the meeting had to be held over and over again. Unluckily, the final decision hadn’t come out until the deadline.

Finally, the group was dismissed by the leader of the company. I learned the lesson from [ learn my lesson from 表示得到了教训。这块表达不太准确] the experience that rude 【rude为adj.  用rudeness】 could only make things worse, though the reason was for the things itself.


In sum, I agree with the statement that there’s no reason to be rude to others because it will make others look down on us, break the relationship with friends, and make works worse.




整体很不错。用词上可以再改进下。

huluhulufei

谢谢瓜瓜！！！ 关于这句：
The young toads and toad's eggs are always in streams and rivers, which are flowing almost（always？）
后面那个从句写的不对，应该是瓜瓜改过之后的，就是： which are flowing always.  

细节的部分，feifei会注意！ 比如： have difficulty in +Ving  之类的~    撒花~撒花~~

huluhulufei

谢谢 guoyang!!!!!  关于这句：
 I learned the lesson from [ learn my lesson from 表示得到了教训。这块表达不太准确] the experience that rude 【rude为adj. 用rudeness】 could only make things worse, though the reason was for the things itself.

确实有问题。。 我现在改一下：  The experience I've got from it leads me to believe that rudeness could have profound negative impact on the works, though the reason for it is for the work itself.
这回还成吗？？？咩咩~~~嘻~~
rude 和 rudeness  我也没有注意。。。该打该打。。。咩~

以后feifei 一定注意改正喽！！ 撒花~~撒花~~~咩~~~

huluhulufei

本来feifei  是要去改 24号 瓜瓜的综合的，怎么木要找到？？ 莫非瓜瓜是特意来给feifei 改滴那~~太感谢了！！！热泪盈眶中！！

huluhulufei

7.25 综合 TPO 16


The reading passage holds the point that archaeology in Britain was faced with serious problems and limitations in three major aspects. And the professor in the lecture recommends a specific Guideline Rule, which was passed through by the government, to help solve these problems. The main contexts of the Guideline Rule are as follows.

First, the reading argues that many ancient valuable artifacts were destroyed due to new construction projects. The professor claims that one rule of the Guideline advocates that all cites, before new construction, should be examined by the archeologists to make sure if they are of great archeology interests or value. If the answer is yes, a plan will be made by the government and related institutions to preserve the cite, whether to make new buildings around or suspend the construction until excavate and reserve all the valuable artifacts.

Second, the reading points out that there’s lack of financial support for archaeological research. The problem is wonderfully dealt with by the rule from Guideline that the research and the related works will be paid by the construction company. By such rule, there will be far more opportunities for archaeological research to examine cites clearly and completely. Thus the archaeologists will learn a lot more than what they have learned in the past.

Third, the reading asserts that it’s of a great difficult career as an archaeologist because there were no more positions available for this job. However, the rule from the Guideline maintains that there’s in need of a huge amount of archaeologists to examine cites, make plans, do research, conclude the process and make clear reports and articles. Therefore, the number of archeologists increases dramatically, and the increase trend has reached the highest now.

huluhulufei

7月25日Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The most important problems in today’s world will be solved in our lifetime.



There is a general discussion these days over important problems in today’s world. One of the questions under debate is whether it will be solved in our lifetime. When face with the inner evil human personality, the conflicts between cultures and religions, and the potential problems brought by developed technologies, I would hardly believe that we will solve these tough problems. The reasons are as follows.

To begin with, the inner evil character of human will never be deracinated, as long as human exist. No one is born without weakness, which can be understood as the sources of human problems. Though government is forever talking about the beautiful sculptures in central parks, making every effort to make the whole city neat and create artistic atmosphere, the government can never promise residents that there will be no unemployment, no drugs, no crimes and no students who drop out. Obviously, the problems will also never been solved by social researchers, scientists, diplomats and economists. In fact, it is human’s inner character that contributes to these problems. Therefore, such problems will last permanent.

In addition, the conflicts between different cultures and religions are also the problems without proper solutions. Our earth is constructed by five continents, which provide different people with different skin colors, languages, living habits, and social regulations. It’s hard to say which religion outweighs another, because everything would finally owe to one theme—culture. Even though there has been great revolution in American history about the emancipation of black slave, the discrimination still exists now, which cannot be solved by force from any institution or individual. Therefore, the conflict of culture is significantly a tough one, which will not be solved in our life’s time.

What’s more, the high-developed technologies will bring huge amounts of problems in the future. Some people may go into raptures at the discovery of nuclear power, which can be utilized as a replacement of fuel and water to make electricity power. However, when face with hundreds of people dying in the Second World War in Japan, due to atom bomb explosion; we may never forget the crime of nuclear power on earth. Moreover, people may be happy seeing new industry products due to the development of chemistry, which will bring dramatic profits to residents. However, when we see the chemical weapon, which may destroy the whole earth, to be the potential power in the new world war, the conclusion may be safely drawn that new problems will come, which will is out of our expectation and control.

In sum, from what has been discussed above, it may safely draw the conclusion that important problems nowadays may hardly find its solutions in our life time, because of the conflicts between different cultures, inner evil human character, and new problems from technologies.

kchszy061ban

蓝色为意见或建议高亮为精彩绿色为总结红色为错误
The reading passage holds the point that archaeology in Britain was faced with serious problems and limitations in three major aspects. And the professor in the lecturerecommends a specific Guideline Rule, which was passed through by the government, to help solve these problems. The main contexts of the Guideline Rule are as follows

First, the reading argues that many ancient valuable artifacts were destroyed due to new construction projects. The professor claims that one rule of the Guideline advocates that all cites, before new construction, should be examined by the archeologists to make sure if they are of great archeology interests or value. If the answer is yes, a plan will be made by the government and related institutions to preserve the cite, whether to make new buildings around or suspend the construction until excavate and reserve all the valuable artifacts.

Second, the reading points out that there’s lack of financial support for archaeological research. The problem is wonderfully dealt with by the rule from Guideline that the research and the related works will be paid by the construction company. By such rule, there will be far more opportunities for archaeological research to examine cites clearly and completely. Thus the archaeologists will learn a lot more than what they have learned in the past.

Third, the reading asserts that it’s of a great difficult career as an archaeologist because there were no more positions available for this job（这个不用了）. However, the rule from the Guideline maintains that there’s in need of a huge amount of archaeologists to examine cites, make plans, do research, conclude the process and make clear reports and articles. Therefore, the number of archeologists increases dramatically, and the increase trend has reached the highest now.
都写的很全额，而且那个句子变换很多啊。嘿嘿

qianjun06

7月25日Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The most important problems in today’s world will be solved in our lifetime.



There is a general discussion these days over important problems in today’s world. One of the questions under debate is whether it will be solved in our lifetime. When face with the inner evil human personality, the conflicts between cultures and religions, and the potential problems brought by developed technologies, I would hardly believe that we will solve these tough problems. The reasons are as follows.

To begin with, the inner evil character of human will never be deracinated, as long as human exist. No one is born without weakness, which can be understood as the sources of human problems. Though government is forever talking about the beautiful sculptures in central parks, making every effort to make the whole city neat and create artistic atmosphere, the government can never promise residents that there will be no unemployment, no drugs, no crimes and no students who drop out. Obviously, the problems will also never been solved by social researchers, scientists, diplomats and economists. In fact, it is human’s inner character that contributes to these problems. Therefore, such problems will last permanent.人性邪恶一面不会被消除？排比用的比较好

In addition, the conflicts between different cultures and religions are also the problems without proper solutions. Our earth is constructed by five continents, which provide different people with different skin colors, languages, living habits, and social regulations. It’s hard to say which religion outweighs another, because everything would finally owe to one theme—culture. Even though there has been great revolution in American history about the emancipation of black slave, the discrimination still exists now, which cannot be solved by force from any institution or individual. Therefore, the conflict of culture is a significantly a tough one, which will not be solved in our life’s time.

What’s more, the high-developed technologies will bring huge amounts of problems in the future. Some people may go into raptures at the discovery of nuclear power, which can be utilized as a replacement of fuel and water to make electricity power. However, when face with hundreds of people dying in the Second World War in Japan, due to atom bomb explosion; we may never forget the crime of nuclear power on earth. Moreover, people may be happy seeing new industry products due to the development of chemistry, which will bring dramatic profits to residents. However, when we see the chemical weapon, which may destroy the whole earth, to beas the potential power in the new world war, the conclusion may be safely drawn that new problems will come, which will is out of our expectation and control.

In sum, from what has been discussed above, it may safely draw the conclusion that important problems nowadays may hardly find its solutions in our life time, because of the conflicts between different cultures, inner evil human character, and new problems from technologies.
写的好流利啊，例子举得很好，用词很到位

huluhulufei

7.26 TPO 17 综合

The reading passage holds the point that bird population is decreasing due to three main aspects. However, the professor in the lecture claims that the evidence that reading provides is untenable. She uses three specific points to support her idea.

First, the reading claims that birds’ habitats are destroying by the expanding human populations and settlements, therefore, the bird populations will surely decrease. On the contrary, the professor points out that though some bird species are negative influenced by it, there are much more species benefit from it, like pigeons, which take full advantage of streets and houses. In other words, the new constructions provide for much more birds. The statement of the professor proves its counterpart indefensible.

Second, the agriculture is true growing, but it is not for the exploration of new wild land. In fact, there is less land for agriculture nowadays, and there’s a new productive crop. Therefore, there’s no need to destroy the natural habitat. The professor’s statement directly contradicts what the reading says that the growing areas in need for agriculture will surely destroy more birds’ habitat.

Third, the reading maintains that the increasing trend of chemical pesticide use will make bird population decrease because of the infected water and poisoned insects, which will be harmful to the birds. However, the professor argues that people now have been aware of this problem and the two main steps have been adopted to solve it. First, new and less poisoned pesticide has been created. Second, an increasing number of pest-resistant crop is made, which will not be attractive to the insects, and does not need chemical pesticide. What’s more, it does not harm birds.