非常感谢peanut84 这篇文章还有不明白的地方 就是congress 文章开始说 Blue Clark properly emphasizes the Court’s assertion (10) of a virtually unlimited unilateral power of Congress (the House of Represen- tatives and the Senate) over Native American affairs. congress有权管理土著事务 后来说 Congress abolished the making of treaties with Native American tribes. congress废除土著部族谈判权。 又提到 But in reality the federal government continued to nego- (30) tiate formal tribal agreements past the turn of the century, treating these documents not as treaties with sover- eign nations requiring ratification by the Senate but simply as legislation to be (35) passed by both houses of Congress. congress的Senate和house的不同作用。 综上 文中提到多次 congress目的是什么?我觉得congress带给我阅读极大混淆,让我分不清楚重点。 Congress abolished the making of treaties with Native American tribes. congress废除土著部族谈判权。 又提到 But in reality the federal government continued to nego- (30) tiate formal tribal agreements past the turn of the century, treating these documents not as treaties with sover- eign nations requiring ratification by the Senate but simply as legislation to be (35) passed by both houses of Congress. congress的Senate和house的不同作用。 综上 文中提到多次 congress目的是什么?我觉得congress带给我阅读极大混淆,让我分不清楚重点。 |