ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: peddy
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[坐稳] 伍月肆日坐稳寂静整理~(AA【41只】,AI【42只】6/2-10:25更新)

[精华] [复制链接]
191#
发表于 2012-5-9 23:59:31 | 只看该作者
嘿嘿~!开始作文。。谢谢楼主
192#
发表于 2012-5-10 00:46:25 | 只看该作者
感谢
193#
发表于 2012-5-10 01:44:01 | 只看该作者
明天考试 谢谢LZ机经整理~! 也谢谢LZ的密码 相信自己!
194#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-5-10 07:48:50 | 只看该作者
发错了,是
-- by 会员 三浦春马 (2012/5/9 23:57:44)



哈哈~~~太可爱了~~加油写作文哦!有问题再交流~~
195#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-5-10 07:49:37 | 只看该作者
我看了那篇买房子还是买股票的那篇没有例文,我很快写了一篇, 大家参考下多给个意见。

While the stock price is declining, the house price has been soaring over the last 5 years. According to the author, it is the high time we buy the house rather than invest in the stock market. To further substantiate his advice, the author also points out that a house can help generate a life of higher quality than a stock does. Unfortunately, the reasoning behind the suggestion suffers from several critical problems.

In the first place, the argument is based on a unfounded assumption that owning a stock can not contribute to a high-level life quality as owning a home can. Even if, as the author says, a home can in some way contribute to a happier and better life for someone, there are possibilities that investing money in the stock market can be a better lifestyle for others. Perhaps, the ups-and-down experience or the pay-first experiences are the understanding of better life for those people. Not all men love peaceful and even bland life. Without considering the general conception of better life, the author can hardly convince us of the suggestion based on the problematic assumption.

Furthermore, the argument is ill-founded due to the lack of enough samples to support his opinion. The author suggests the house purchase simply because the house prices during the last 5 years have nearly doubled whereas the stock prices have fallen. The only evidence used is the statistic from the past five years, a statistic not necessarily acting as a good indicator of the general trend. It might be the case that a policy which supported the property market was introduced five years ago, but it will not be effect from the end of this year. If it were the case, the evidence cited by the author is an atypical and exceptional one. Unless providing enough information to prove that the statistic from the past 5 years is representative of the following several years, the suggestion is unwarranted and fallacious.

To better back up the suggestion, the author should clearly point out the general understanding of high-quality life, and try to indicate that the price trend for both property and stock market would continue.
-- by 会员 chingchan123 (2012/5/9 15:16:17)

感谢!~我会补充到JJ整理中~!
196#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-5-10 07:50:19 | 只看该作者
?消费品出口是否比政治外交更有效
消费品出口?和政治外交能比吗???
对神马的来说,更重要???

我个人觉得这个题目角度比较大,要从某一方面入手,比如消费品出口是否比政治外交在维持本国贸易平衡上更有效。
-- by 会员 单调唱 (2012/5/9 19:34:45)



好的~谢谢~我一会为这个题整理个word文档~
197#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-5-10 07:50:51 | 只看该作者
?消费品出口是否比政治外交更有效
我想是不是指比如可口可乐占领中国市场和奥巴马访华哪个更能拉近中美关系,或者说扩大美国的影响力?
-- by 会员 ahasusanna (2012/5/9 17:44:40)



好的~一会整理~
198#
发表于 2012-5-10 08:29:57 | 只看该作者
多谢多谢
199#
发表于 2012-5-10 08:43:27 | 只看该作者
感谢
200#
发表于 2012-5-10 08:53:30 | 只看该作者
请问一下楼主大大,第一道题将政府控制居民图书借阅的记录和上网活动。上网还能理解,图书借阅和国家安全之间是怎样的一种联系呢,请大大明示,感激不尽~~

另外关于第七题~我觉得是否可以将出口商品抽象为经济力量,将政治家抽象为政治力量,于是就对比经济力量与政治力量两者在建立世界秩序、改变国家格局上哪一个更有影响力。然后具体的例子可以再从出口商品和政治家出发,你这样的思路成吗?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-3 18:57
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部