热心的朋友看过来,这道题大全-13-13看的偶一头雾水!!

courtney8848

该题提问怎么这么绕呀,大家帮偶全面作个解释吧,谢谢

13.   One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare it with other companies. This technique, commonly called “benchmarking,” permits the manager of a company to discover better industrial practices and can provide a justification for the adoption of good practices.

Any of the following, if true, is a valid reason for benchmarking the performance of a company against companies with which it is not in competition rather than against competitors EXCEPT:

(A) Comparisons with competitors are most likely to focus on practices that the manager making the comparisons already employs.

(B) Getting “inside” information about the unique practices of competitors is particularly difficult.

(C) Since companies that compete with each other are likely to have comparable levels of efficiency, only benchmarking against noncompetitors is likely to reveal practices that would aid in beating competitors.

(D) Managers are generally more receptive to new ideas that they find outside their own industry.（E）

(E) Much of the success of good companies is due to their adoption of practices that take advantage of the special circumstances of their products of markets.

携隐

这题问的是，以下选项是为了给出一个理由，来说明跟自己的竞争对手比较不如跟不和自己公司在一个竞争市场上的其他公司比较来的有效，除了：

courtney8848

谢谢你,wow,希望考试的时候不要遇见这种提问方式,不喜欢呀

WalkByFaith

don't NN think C is better?

(C) Since companies that compete with each other are likely to have comparable levels of efficiency, only benchmarking against noncompetitors is likely to reveal practices that would aid in beating competitors.

It seems that the ultimate aim of benchmarking is to compete with competitors, which could be counted as a exception very well, doesn't it?

[because all the actions benmarking does is to aid to beat competitors...]

remona9t

以下是引用whq2002在2005-6-28 4:00:00的发言：

don't NN think C is better?

(C) Since companies that compete with each other are likely to have comparable levels of efficiency, only benchmarking against noncompetitors is likely to reveal practices that would aid in beating competitors.

It seems that the ultimate aim of benchmarking is to compete with competitors, which could be counted as a exception very well, doesn't it?

[because all the actions benmarking does is to aid to beat competitors...]

题目的问题是：以下的几个原因可以说明：和非竞争对手比较比和竞争对手比较能够更好的benchmark一个公司的表现，除了：

C不是正好说明了：和非竞争对手比较可以更好的获得有价值的经验，且更好的benchmark呀！

所以E是正确答案

[此贴子已经被作者于2005-6-28 12:33:28编辑过]

一起加油的夥伴

我還是不太懂耶,

題目說明了要找 不要跟非競爭對手比較好(因為是Except題)

那麼為何要選 E 呢?

高手指點一下,感激

铁甲

A,B说明了跟竞争对手比较不好,或有难度

CD说明了与非竞争对手比较的好处和理由.

E:优秀公司的成功是由于他们采取的措施利用了其产品的特殊市场优势.

无关选项,没说明问题.

一起加油的夥伴

謝謝铁甲,

謝謝你詳細的解答讓我了解了

handsong

这题先考语法中的并列结构，胸闷ing...

所以，逻辑题考语法，语法题考逻辑，阅读题考语法和逻辑，不管什么题，语法和逻辑一个都不能少啊！

ambrosecelin

狂汗的题。。。还好有前辈指导。。。