ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2834|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[资料分享] 发点国外Gmat论坛上牛人们对语法的几点解析 & OG语法几个难题的详细解析

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-4-26 14:05:32 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
,也没什么经验,不知道这样发是否合适,自己从这些语法讲解里受益匪浅,大家觉得有用的话就看看吧。附件里的SC题是我做的过程中觉得有些难度,看OG的解析又不是非常理解,所以总结了国外论坛几个老师的讲解,看完了觉得思路清晰了很多,推荐给大家。



Ron: SC 3- STEP PROTOCOL

Step 1: READ the sentence, and look for two things:
- Look for the general meaning of the sentence
- Look for PARALLELISM
Look in 2 ways:
* Signal words
* CONTEXT


Step 2: look for SPLITS among the answer choices
- Make sure that you don't mistake "fake splits" (i.e., word rearrangements that aren't substitutes for each other) for real splits.


Step 3: criticize things that are wrong with individual answer choices (even if they are not part of splits)



Ron: 比较小用法
For instance
I know more about Shakespeare than my brother does
I know more about Shakespeare than does my brother
Both correct
BUT
I know more about Shakespeare than my brother, who has never studied British literature, does
--> This sentence is basically unreadable (you'll have to read it several times before you can make any sense of “does”), so it's unacceptable.
I know more about Shakespeare than does my brother, who has never studied British literature
--> Correct.




Ron: quick rundown on how to use COMMA + -ING
Example:
(1) My brother took extra courses every semester throughout his college career, graduating in only three years.
--> Correct. In this case, the modifier (graduating in 3 years) correctly describes an immediate consequence of the action in the main clause; furthermore, the subject of "graduating" is the same as the subject of that clause (i.e., my brother).

(2) My brother ate frozen food every day throughout his college career, graduating in only three years.
--> Incorrect. There are no grammatical issues with this sentence, but it's absurd in terms of meaning: there is no causal or consequential relationship between eating frozen food and graduating early.



Ron:“due to”
The easiest way to figure out "due to":
"Due to" means "caused by".
If you can't replace "due to" with "caused by", then it's wrong.

For instance:
I was late due to the construction --> incorrect (because you can't say "I was late caused by the construction")
I was late because of the construction --> correct.


In general, "due to" only applies to nouns, since it means, "caused by".
For instance,
The traffic jam was due to an obstruction in the left lane
Or
The traffic jam due to the obstruction in the left lane caused 30-minute delays


Distinguish:
The word distinguish has more than one meaning.
To distinguish X from Y and to distinguish between X and Y mean to discern the difference between X and Y.
To distinguish yourself means to do such good job that you separate yourself from the rest:

You really distinguished yourself on the GMAT = you did a great job on the GMAT.
To distinguish X means to discern X (to be able to separate X from everything around it so that you can perceive it clearly).

In the SC:
The ability of some children to distinguish discrete sounds and words = the ability of some children to discern the different sounds and words.


Consider用法
Consider X to be Y
Consider X Y
Consider X as Y
All of them are correct.

The first two have exactly the same meaning; you'd use the first only when the extra words 'to be' are justified, either because they resolve some sort of ambiguity or because there's just A LOT of stuff between 'X' and 'Y'.

Examples:
Most Americans consider Beverly Hills, a ritzy suburb to the north of Los Angeles, to be a desirable place to live. <-- Possible ambiguity (could mean l.a. is desirable) if you don't include 'to be' here
Most Americans consider Beverly Hills a desirable place to live. <-- No ambiguity, so 'to be' would be unnecessarily wordy

'Consider as' means 'consider restrictedly in the capacity of or in the role of'.
For instance:
Considered as a work of art, Grant Wood's "American Gothic" is wholly unremarkable; considered as a depiction of everyday 1930's Americana, however, it is a classic piece. <-- i.e., the piece is unremarkable from the standpoint of art, but remarkable from the standpoint of American historical portrayal.





P.S 说点题外话,明天又要北美再战了, 这次瞒了所有的人。平时每天都很忙,只能抽空来复习,每天两杯咖啡每周几瓶红牛已经习以为常了,头发最近也是一抓一把的掉,本来复习时间就少这几天又亲戚拜访耽误了几天打乱了计划。。。Anyway, 不管结果如何,我都会坦然接受的,最后祝愿每一个在追梦路上的孩子都能取得满意的成绩。

本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x
收藏收藏2 收藏收藏2
沙发
发表于 2012-4-26 23:09:17 | 只看该作者
谢谢你~~~加油~~~祝好祝凯旋~~~
板凳
发表于 2012-4-30 22:57:27 | 只看该作者
非常感谢啊~~!!!楼主人品大大的~
地板
发表于 2013-9-18 19:57:37 | 只看该作者
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-15 05:09
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部