ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

In response to mounting pubic concern, an airplane manufacturer implemented a program with the well-publicized goal of reducing by half the total yearly amount of hazardous waste generated by its passenger-jet division. When the program began in 1994, the division's hazardous waste output was 90 pounds per production worker; last year it was 40 pounds per production worker. Clearly, therefore, charges that the manufacturer's program has not met its goal are false.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

正确答案: E

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 1467|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求助一道逻辑题

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-4-19 15:55:34 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
76.(30649-!-item-!-188;#058&005626)



In response to mounting public concern, an airplane manufacturer implemented a program with the well-publicized goal of reducing by half the total yearly amount of hazardous waste generated by its passenger-jet division.  When the program began in 1994, the division's hazardous waste output was 90 pounds per production worker; last year it was 40 pounds per production worker.  Clearly, therefore, charges that the manufacturer's program has not met its goal are false.  

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?



A. The amount of nonhazardous waste generated each year by the passenger-jet division has not increased significantly since 1994.

B. At least as many passenger jets were produced by the division last year as had been produced in 1994.

C. Since 1994, other divisions in the company have achieved reductions in hazardous waste output that are at least equal to that achieved in the passenger-jet division.

D. The average number of weekly hours per production worker in the passenger-jet division was not significantly greater last year than it was in 1994.

E. The number of production workers assigned to the passenger-jet division was not significantly less in 1994 than it was last year.

想知道D选项为什么不行? 谢谢
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2012-5-4 11:28:10 | 只看该作者
题目中强调这个programde 的作用是减少total amount of waste。虽然就per production worker 而言,waste output的百分比下降了,但是如果本来worker数量在94年少而在去年很多,就不能说明total amount下降了,所以加上E选项是必要的。
板凳
发表于 2012-5-7 11:01:15 | 只看该作者
工作时间跟这道题没有关系吧。。我觉得~
地板
发表于 2012-10-8 00:18:07 | 只看该作者
90 pounds per production worker
你不知道这里的人均是每小时呢?还是每年呢?
5#
发表于 2012-10-8 00:35:39 | 只看该作者
同意3楼,和工作时间没关系。

注意原文中的“per production worker”

谈论工人数量,可以扯上关系。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-26 23:16
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部