4.10. 二战690 Q51 V32放狗 （4.11.更新逻辑阅读各一篇）

qq341163712

话说才回来 LZ考到这个分数也在情理之中，不过还是略纠结啊= = 多半还是想再冲7一次

先上作文
AA： self-employed比起office的工作较为financially unwise,理由有三，1.distractions from noise,neighbor and blabla. 2.no schedule to follow leading to laziness. 3.isolation from society leads to few opportunities in advancement
AI: Constant innovation within organization 带来的damage与improvement 一样多


接下来是阅读 楼主人品不好 4篇阅读中一篇JJ 鉴定古画
由于时间极度不够用，LZ只仔细阅读了一篇关于American Native Origin的研究
说是由于坐船去美洲大陆的说法太不靠谱，科学家在多少年以前一直对此不以为然，普遍认为是在冰川时期从阿拉斯加走过去的。
然后根据研究，在多少年之前，不具备走过去的条件。然后在多少年（大概1000年左右吧）之后，就有证据表明美洲有人啦。
所以他们得在这段时间从北走到南。作者认为这样是feat（还是什么词的），大概就是说这个速度很不靠谱。
于是第二段就开始讨论，有人就觉得从海上划船过去挺好，不过划船的话，很难找到证据来证明。（这边是有题的，好像是个细节题）
因为有当初证据的地方被水淹了，成深海区啦。在最后就说什么，就挺有必要去探索深海区，发掘证据什么的。
有个主旨题，其中有一项就是给理由，要去探索深海区什么的，不过狗主没选这个，大家可以讨论下。


其他目前失忆了，想到继续补充吧。


还有最后一道数学题LZ还记得，18m/sec速度的鸟飞一个湖，飞啊飞，问飞到21KM没
1.飞了小于20min
2.飞了小于2/5h


lz写到这题还十多分钟，差点就给绕进去，最后还是想明白了，选E，jj里面有的 嗯


还有些题有点印象，想到发上来吧= =

-----------------------------------------------------------------


先谈谈一点小感受，LZ一战就跟木有复习，也不知道JJ考的500多。
然后这次考完数学的时候感觉都极度美好。
结果一进入语文阶段就傻眼了。
话说LZ平常做题虽说正确率不说超高，考点基本上都能捕捉到吖。
可是对着电脑屏幕由于没法用笔划分句子结构，阅读能力直线下降。大脑各种浆糊。
逻辑还好，自认为逻辑应该都对的。因为无关选项挺好找的。
但是感觉都很简单的语法题，就是看不进去，结果pace差到爆。最后10分钟剩下10题。匆匆选完交卷了。


大家要是谁和我一样有类似阅读障碍，不妨多拿电脑练练，不要总对着本子做。。。
吸取LZ血的教训吖- -

pangpangyun

感谢LZ放狗啊啊~！！

LZ还记不记的逻辑呢~

谢啦~！

peddy

求逻辑啊lz！！！谢谢~~

qq341163712

想起语文第一道题。是语法题
ice particles not only ...but also...
好像这个选项里有个which
话说not only but also在我的考试里面出现好多次嘞。

394316753

谢谢楼主！还能想起阅读  逻辑吗

wwc008love

唉。。这个分刚好700啊。。怎么

qq341163712

三十九
某种药，有两类反映，一类是副作用，一类是病情改善。所有病人中，至少有10%有副作用，另外，在所有病情有所改善的病人中，60%的人有病情改善。 问副作用的人和病情改善的人哪类多？1.病情改善的人占总人数的90%
2.所有有副作用的人中有90%（的人有病情改善。

数学遇到了这题 但是我选择的和jj不一样= =
上面的条件是有副作用的人，60%improvement


我肿么觉得这个选项2不sufficient呢
所以选的是A。

qq341163712

看了别人的jj想到一道数学= = （为什么木有逻辑？因为语文毛的考好。没认真读。。。）
说一个三位数xyz，3个数加在一起等于15，求个位，units digit
条件1，2x=1/2y ，
条件2，z是x的3/4

应该是这样的吧 反正很简单，两个条件都用上能求出来

天边的小猪

感谢楼主~求逻辑狗~~~

michaelqiao

谢谢楼主！

考古美洲大陆，是这篇吗？

63. 美洲
人们在什么时候以何种方式到美洲  共两段，一屏多（有整段高亮（第二段的结构）基本可以靠数字定位,全靠关键定位）

人类何时到达美洲，还有争议。考古的发现显示的最早时间的14,700年前。
第 一个假说是，通过陆路。说人们可以通过COASTAL JOURNEY 沿海岸走，因为爱斯基摩皮船(kayak)太小不太可能做跨海的交通工具。由于ice age，人类不可能于15,700年前通过陆路到达美洲(讲了原因“冰呀，海呀什么的”)。还讲了什么向南走，一个月可以走20里。多少年后到了南美。
第二个假说是，通过海路。但没有证据。由于ice age结束后海平面升高，即使有证据也被淹没了。到海底去挖掘有不太可能。所以还是没有结论。

有主旨题。
第二段全highlight了，问作用。
好像有个15,000到15,500的数字题~


文章大意:
人类经由怎样地方式到达南美洲，还有争议。考古的发现显示的最早时间的14,700年前。旧观点是，通过陆路。因为独木舟(kayak)太小不太可能做跨海的交通工具。由于ice age，人类不可能于15,700年前通过陆路到达美洲。但是旧观点有个问题，就是人移动的速度太快了不合理。学者F提出新观点，通过海路，支持的理由是坐船移动的速度合理。但是因为冰河融化，当时沿岸可住人的地区现在都在海底，很难证明。转折，最新海底考古有证据支持沿岸的确有住人，但是这个证据对於支持海路说还是薄弱的。结论是陆路或海路尚无定论，但对於F学者提出的海路迁移开始时间点(14,000~15,000年前)是普遍被接受的。

Transportation to the New World is a big topic for debate. 提出问题If the early Americans did cruise巡航 around the continent in canoes and kayaks, might the first settlers have arrived by boat as well? For decades the archaeological community rejected this notion (Ice Agehunters could never have carried all their weapons and left over mammoth meat in such tiny boats!), but in recent years the idea has gathered more support.旧观点反对经由海路假说
One reason for the shift: the nagging困扰的 problem of just how fast people can make the journey from Alaska toTierra del Fuego. 旧观点的问题症结点Consider Dillehay's 14,700-year-old Monte Verde site. According to the previously accepted timeline, people could have made the journey from Asia on foot no earlier than 15,700 years ago(before this time, the ice sheets extending from the North Pole covered Alaskaand Canada completely, making a land passage impossible). If this entry date is correct, the Monte Verde find would indicate that the first settlers had to make the 12,000 -mile trip through two continents in only 1,000 years. In archaeological time, that's as fast as Marion Jones(地球上跑得最快的女人). 提出反对旧观点的理由:行走速度太快? One way to achieve this pace , however,would be by traveling along the Pacific coastlines of North and SouthAmerica in boats. 转折, F提出海路假说新观点Knut Fladmark, a professor of archaeology at Simon Fraser University in Burnaby, BC, first suggested this possibility in the 1970s and remains an advocate of a coastal entry into the Americas. If people had a reason to keep moving, he says, they could have traversed both continents in 100 years. 支持理由:速度符合Fladmark estimates that traveling at a rate of 200 miles a month would have been quite reasonable; the settlers no doubt stopped during winter months and probably stayed in some spots for a generation or so if the local resourceswere particularly tempting. Fladmark's theory, though enticing won't be easy to prove. 让步,提出缺陷Rising sea levels from the melting Ice Age glaciers in undated thousands of square miles along the Pacific coasts of both continents. Any early sites near the ocean that were inhabited before 13,000 years ago would now be deep underwater. 新观点的弱点Recently a few enterprising researchers have attempted to dredge挖出 up artifacts from below the Pacific. In 1997, for example, Daryl Fedje, an archaeologist with Parks Canada (which runs that country's national parks system), led a team that pulled up a small stone tool from 160 feet underwater just off the coast of British Columbia. 提出证据证明新观点The single tool, which Fedje estimates to be around 10,200 years old, does establish that people once lived on the now submerged land but reveals little about the culture there. Excavating underwater sites might turn out to be the only way to prove when humans first arrived on this continent.提出对证据的质疑? And for many researchers this is still a very open question 因为证据力不足，海路说尚未定论, with answers ranging from 15,000 years ago to as far back as 50,000 years ago. When Fladmark first proposed the idea of a coastal migration, the entry date of 14,000 or 15,000 years ago was orthodoxy.公认的,持普遍赞同的
结论是有关F的新观点的开始时间点(14,000~15,000年前)是被普遍接受的