ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3488|回复: 13
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[考古] 工业革命对妇女工作的影响 求认证

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-4-10 13:33:41 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
妇女在工业革命前后地位变化一篇是妇女在工业革命前后地位到底有没有变化,两大段,一屏,先是说有两个作者写文章说没什么变化,第二段就开始反驳那篇文章的观点。一篇是实体经济和虚拟经济,三小段,一屏。
V2
2篇是个什么tax
大概结构   1 讲研究某个时期妇女地位资料缺乏,因为法律不承认女人的经济地位,。。(原因考)
2 但是某某学者从tax law的变迁看到了妇女地位的改变
3 重点,怎么改变,怎么看到(考点全部集中在后面几行,我的这篇出现在我第二篇,后面单词多到想跳楼)
1 mainpurpose  2.3.4
全部在最后几行,注意对比V3 (V34)
工业革命对妇女工作的影响。比较简单,但因为没时间了所以看得很快~两段,第一段说有俩人认为工业革命对妇女工作一点影响也没有,第二段全在否定这俩学者的观点,作者的态度是全否。问题1:文章主旨(或者是purpose。我昏了~):批判俩学者观点   问题2:下面哪项是这俩学者认为的   问题3highlight最后一句表明:好像是选family 啥啥啥的。。
OLD JJ
講两本评价妇女革命的书,着重将第二本。
第一本认为industrializationfamilycontext 对妇女的work decision 没有影响。
第二本书除了比较了18 19世纪妇女的情况外,还提出了一种新的看问题的方式。说对妇女的评价要基于一个framereference 。说妇女一方面是lose power 了,比如送小孩、监管学校之类的活都给男人干去了;但是同时在另一方面又gainpower 了,比如有了更多的real estate 。文章最后批评第一本书不好,因为没有statisticanalyze
JJ 说的细节没有错,但是主线没有抓住。第二段中的两本书,分别简称“POST for Middle class,STORY for working class. 是用来证明第一段的MEDIA的。
对不起,我记得不是很清楚,但是JJ 里面的细节是很容易看懂的,对FOCUS的把握可能因人而异。这也就是为什么同样的文章,TESTER写出不同的JJ来。
V2
还一篇是说谁谁谁在一本书里说工业化改变了妇女的workmanagement?,但后来被否定了这个说法,而且family context还在妇女工作决策中占了很重要的地位。且妇女能够参加的工作和程度variedlittle。但最后一句引用那书里的话没看懂...有一题主旨题,还有问可以推出下列那个是对的云云。
PREP 原文:
Traditionalsocial science models of class groups in the United States
are based on economicstatus and assume that women's economic status derives from association withmen, typically fathers or husbands, and that women therefore have morecompelling common interest with men of their own economic class than with womenoutside it.  Some feminist social scientists, by contrast, have arguedthat the basic division in American society is instead based on gender, andthat the total female population, regardless of economic status, constitutes adistinct class.  Social historian Mary Ryan, for example, has argued thatin early-nineteenth-century Americathe identical legal status of working-class and middle-class free womenoutweighed the differences between women of these two classes:  marriedwomen, regardless of their family's wealth, did essentially the same unpaiddomestic work, and none could own property or vote.  Recently, though,other feminist analysts have questioned this model, examining ways in which thecondition of working-class women differs from that of middle-class women aswell as from that of working-class men.  Ann Oakley notes, for example,that the gap between women of different economic classes widened in the latenineteenth century:  most working-class women, who performed wage laboroutside the home, were excluded from the emerging middle-class ideal offemininity centered around domesticity and volunteerism.
Question #16.  189-01  (21999-!-item-!-188;#058&000189-01)
The primary purpose of the passage is to
(A) offer sociohistorical explanations for the cultural differences between menand women in the United States
(B) examine how the economic roles of women in the United States changed duringthe nineteenth century
(C) consider differing views held by social scientists concerning women's classstatus in the United States
(D) propose a feminist interpretation of class structure in the United States
(E) outline specific distinctions between working-class women and women of theupper and middle classes  

Question #17.  189-03  (22045-!-item-!-188;#058&000189-03)
It can be inferred from the passage that the most recent feminist socialscience research on women and class seeks to do which of the following?
(A) Introduce a divergent new theory about the relationship between legalstatus and gender
(B) Illustrate an implicit middle-class bias in earlier feminist models ofclass and gender
(C) Provide evidence for the position that gender matters more than wealth indetermining class status
(D) Remedy perceived inadequacies of both traditional social science models andearlier feminist analyses of class and gender
(E) Challenge the economic definitions of class used by traditional socialscientists  

Question #18.  189-05  (22091-!-item-!-188;#058&000189-05)
Which of the following statements best characterizes the relationship betweentraditional social science models of class and Ryan's model, as described inthe passage?
(A) Ryan's model differs from the traditional model by making gender, ratherthan economic status, the determinant of women's class status.
(B) The traditional social science model of class differs from Ryan's in itsassumption that women are financially dependent on men.
(C) Ryan's model of class and the traditional social science model both assumethat women work, either within the home or for pay.
(D) The traditional social science model of class differs from Ryan's in thateach model focuses on a different period of American history.  
(E) Both Ryan's model of class and the traditional model consider multiplefactors, including wealth, marital status, and enfranchisement, in determiningwomen's status.  答案:CDA
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2012-4-10 15:27:49 | 只看该作者
UP
板凳
发表于 2012-4-12 14:42:18 | 只看该作者
uo
地板
发表于 2012-4-12 18:26:28 | 只看该作者
求狗主确认
5#
发表于 2012-4-12 18:26:52 | 只看该作者
UP
6#
发表于 2012-4-12 18:35:29 | 只看该作者
UP
7#
发表于 2012-4-12 20:01:36 | 只看该作者
这个OLD的JJ岂不是很像OG12里面388页的文章?
8#
发表于 2012-4-12 20:02:53 | 只看该作者
ding
9#
发表于 2012-4-12 20:33:08 | 只看该作者
up!
10#
发表于 2012-4-12 20:42:49 | 只看该作者
求确认。。。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-6-25 02:59
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部