ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: 秋晨小仔
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[原始] 4.9帝都一战Q42V34总分620.。。上寂静。。。

[精华] [复制链接]
51#
发表于 2012-4-10 15:30:59 | 只看该作者
秋晨加油啊~有V的基础在,Q很好搞定的,相信你~
52#
发表于 2012-4-10 16:09:12 | 只看该作者
数学正常发挥一定有700的。
53#
发表于 2012-4-10 16:50:50 | 只看该作者
楼主说的那道逻辑好像是费费逻辑里的。。。
54#
发表于 2012-4-10 17:23:17 | 只看该作者
V蛮厉害了有木有啊!!
加油!
55#
发表于 2012-4-14 21:05:57 | 只看该作者
Observatory director: Some say that funding the megatelescope will benefit only the astronomers who will work with it. This dangerous point of view, applied to the work of Maxwell, Newton, or Einstein, would have stified their research and deprived the world of beneficial applications, such as the development of radio, that followed from that research.
If the statements above are put forward as an argument in favor of development of the megatelescope, which one of the following is the strongest criticism of that argument?
(A) It appeals to the authority of experts who cannot have known all the issues involved in construction of the megatelescope.
(B) It does not identify those opposed to development of the megatelescope.
(C) It launches a personal attack on opponents of the megatelescope by accusing them of having a dangerous point of view.
(D) It does not distinguish between the economic and the intellectual senses of “benefit”.
(E) It does not show that the proposed megatelescope research is worthy of comparison with that of eminent scientists in its potential for applications.
参考思路:指出推论错误。

(E) It does not show that the proposed mega telescope research is worthy of comparison with that of eminent scientists in its potential for applications. 举的例子不具有可比性

楼主那个爱因斯坦逻辑是不是这个呢? 我觉得不太想 但是还是问问 假如可能是呢
56#
发表于 2012-4-14 21:06:52 | 只看该作者
楼主其实很牛啊 你得数学50都700有了 基础在哪再怎么考都行
57#
发表于 2012-4-14 23:55:25 | 只看该作者
楼主的V牛逼啊,下次绝对700+啊!!
58#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-4-14 23:57:48 | 只看该作者
Observatory director: Some say that funding the megatelescope will benefit only the astronomers who will work with it. This dangerous point of view, applied to the work of Maxwell, Newton, or Einstein, would have stified their research and deprived the world of beneficial applications, such as the development of radio, that followed from that research.
If the statements above are put forward as an argument in favor of development of the megatelescope, which one of the following is the strongest criticism of that argument?
(A) It appeals to the authority of experts who cannot have known all the issues involved in construction of the megatelescope.
(B) It does not identify those opposed to development of the megatelescope.
(C) It launches a personal attack on opponents of the megatelescope by accusing them of having a dangerous point of view.
(D) It does not distinguish between the economic and the intellectual senses of “benefit”.
(E) It does not show that the proposed megatelescope research is worthy of comparison with that of eminent scientists in its potential for applications.
参考思路:指出推论错误。

(E) It does not show that the proposed mega telescope research is worthy of comparison with that of eminent scientists in its potential for applications. 举的例子不具有可比性

楼主那个爱因斯坦逻辑是不是这个呢? 我觉得不太想 但是还是问问 假如可能是呢
-- by 会员 a329689392 (2012/4/14 21:05:57)




亲。。。不是这个。。。我当时很清楚的记得文章中出现了一个大写的P
5555我好难过我是不是产生幻觉了。。。
59#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-4-14 23:58:51 | 只看该作者
楼主其实很牛啊 你得数学50都700有了 基础在哪再怎么考都行
-- by 会员 a329689392 (2012/4/14 21:06:52)


我都不知道我这34的verbal是咋考的。。。不管了,先复习。。。525继续。。这次说啥也不能放数学了~
一起加油哈~
60#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-4-14 23:59:39 | 只看该作者
楼主的V牛逼啊,下次绝对700+啊!!
-- by 会员 fightforusa (2012/4/14 23:55:25)


表示成绩一出来把自己吓一跳。。。不知道是怎么回事。。。
不过要相信自己的实力,继续冲刺!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-11 09:08
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部