ChaseDream
搜索
1234567
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: 秋晨小仔
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[原始] 4.9帝都一战Q42V34总分620.。。上寂静。。。

[精华] [复制链接]
61#
发表于 2012-4-15 09:57:14 | 只看该作者
那就应该不是了 而且这是狒狒逻辑。。。也不咋靠谱
Observatory director: Some say that funding the megatelescope will benefit only the astronomers who will work with it. This dangerous point of view, applied to the work of Maxwell, Newton, or Einstein, would have stified their research and deprived the world of beneficial applications, such as the development of radio, that followed from that research.
If the statements above are put forward as an argument in favor of development of the megatelescope, which one of the following is the strongest criticism of that argument?
(A) It appeals to the authority of experts who cannot have known all the issues involved in construction of the megatelescope.
(B) It does not identify those opposed to development of the megatelescope.
(C) It launches a personal attack on opponents of the megatelescope by accusing them of having a dangerous point of view.
(D) It does not distinguish between the economic and the intellectual senses of “benefit”.
(E) It does not show that the proposed megatelescope research is worthy of comparison with that of eminent scientists in its potential for applications.
参考思路:指出推论错误。

(E) It does not show that the proposed mega telescope research is worthy of comparison with that of eminent scientists in its potential for applications. 举的例子不具有可比性

楼主那个爱因斯坦逻辑是不是这个呢? 我觉得不太想 但是还是问问 假如可能是呢
-- by 会员 a329689392 (2012/4/14 21:05:57)





亲。。。不是这个。。。我当时很清楚的记得文章中出现了一个大写的P
5555我好难过我是不是产生幻觉了。。。
-- by 会员 秋晨小仔 (2012/4/14 23:57:48)

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-8 12:30
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部