GWD-8-13

chaneldl

顶1楼！把A项说的太清晰了！

另外就是C中：new company创造new jobs，题干说，一定要new company的数量多很多，才可以产生更多new jobs，但C说，只要每个new company创造的new jobs很多，那么也可以产生更多的new jobs

sb1119

a record number of大量的，数量超过记录的```      jobs=jobs of everycompany* number of the company 如果每个公司提供工作数量增加 就不要那没多公司了

s110600338

从国外的论坛上找了这个解释，很清楚的逻辑：
Last Year:
1. Established companies = MANY new jobs
2. Many new companies
Result: record number of new jobs

This Year:
1. Established companies = FEWER new jobs
Conclusion: UNLESS record NUMBER of new companies, no new record for new jobs

Assumption: The NUMBER of new companies determines the number of new jobs. In other words, we are assuming that new companies will not hire more individuals PER COMPANY.

Answer choice A is irrelevant to the argument; it makes a comparison between new companies and established companies, rather than between the number of new companies and the number of jobs per new company.

gmatgo1

lupisces 发表于 2009-4-21 23:42
没有创纪录的更多的新公司成立à        不可能break去年的new j ...

对的，我也看到了各个选项里的不同：除了正确选项c说的是per corporation以外, 其他选项都是overall. 但是我还是有疑问的是，为什么要排除一个新公司提供很多工作的可能？一个新公司提供出来的工作，不也还是新工作么？

gmatgo1

s110600338 发表于 2015-5-11 10:01
从国外的论坛上找了这个解释，很清楚的逻辑：
Last Year:
1. Established companies = MANY new jobs

望楼主能抽空回复哈！我看了你发的解释，不明白的一个地方是，为什么一定要强调PER COMPANY?

gmatgo1

s110600338 发表于 2015-5-11 10:01
从国外的论坛上找了这个解释，很清楚的逻辑：
Last Year:
1. Established companies = MANY new jobs

噢说错，不是楼主，是s110600338

amandahui918

brucejohnson 发表于 2006-7-15 00:04
Q13: With a record number of new companies starting up in Derderia, and with previously established  ...

太感谢了，你回复了我对这道题的所有疑惑。

yueyaer246

我觉得这道题主要是搞清楚 jobs offered by new companies 和 new companies数量 之间的关系。

Premise:
1.Last year: new jobs = jobs offered by new companies + jobs offered by established companies
2.This year: new jobs (more than last year)= jobs offered by new companies (more than last year)+ jobs offered by established companies (fewer than last year)
从premise2可以推出：
jobs offered by new companies (more than last year) ->new jobs (more than last year)

conclusion: new companies (more than last year) -> new job (more than last year)

所以assumption需要在premise2和conclusion架桥，说清楚他们2者之间的联系。
对c取非： 如果this year, new companies提供了more job， 就不需要new companies (more than last year) .

橙汁儿529

brucejohnson 发表于 2006-7-15 00:04
Q13: With a record number of new companies starting up in Derderia, and with previously established  ...

太感谢了！！豁然开朗 一点都不啰嗦 讲的很清楚。

奥兰多铁杆球迷

但是总觉得C选项重复前提了。。。