ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: horsefish
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD-8-13

[复制链接]
21#
发表于 2006-7-15 00:04:00 | 只看该作者

Q13:

With a record number of new companies starting up in Derderia, and with previously

established companies adding many new jobs, a record number of new jobs were created

last year in the Derderian economy. This year, previously established companies will not

be adding as many new jobs overall as such companies added last year. Therefore, unless

a record number of companies start up this year, Derderia will not break its record for

new jobs created.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument relies?

A. In a given year, new companies starting up create more new jobs on average than

do previously established companies.

B. The number of people seeking employment is no larger this year than it was last

year.

C. This year, the new companies starting up will not provide substantially more jobs

per company than did new companies last year.

D. Previously established companies in Derderia will be less profitable this year than

such companies were last year.

E. The number of jobs created in the Derderian economy last year was substantially

larger than the number of jobs lost.

这道题我也选C,但理解与LAWYER和加菲猫的不一样。我觉得最重要的是理清题目的中述概念的范围问题。

题干:去年新增new company starting up,加上previously established company,所以新增许多就业机会。今年preveiously established company 创造就业机会比such companys(即指previously established company 自己)去年创造的少,所以结论:今年除非又有新的a record number of companies start up出现,否则就业机会总数不会超过去年。assumption就是:去年新增new company starting up今年创造的就业机会不变或更少。所以选C。

 值得注意的是,C中的第一个出现的new company starting up与第二个出现的new company都是指去年新建的公司,即题干第一句话的那个新建公司,是自我比较,不是指题干最后出现的a record number of new company starting up,题干最后出现的仅指今年新公司。

简而言之:去年就业机会=previously established company + new company starting up(新1), 今年就业机会中previously established company 少了,只有新1不变或更少,才需要新增今年新公司(新2)才能打破去年记录。选项C中的两个new company 均指新1.

真罗嗦,供大家参考。 

22#
发表于 2006-7-31 13:29:00 | 只看该作者

这道题我也选C,但理解与LAWYER和加菲猫的不一样。我觉得最重要的是理清题目的中述概念的范围问题。

题干:去年新增new company starting up,加上previously established company,所以新增许多就业机会。今年preveiously established company 创造就业机会比such companys(即指previously established company 自己)去年创造的少,所以结论:今年除非又有新的a record number of companies start up出现,否则就业机会总数不会超过去年。assumption就是:去年新增new company starting up今年创造的就业机会不变或更少。所以选C。

 值得注意的是,C中的第一个出现的new company starting up与第二个出现的new company都是指去年新建的公司,即题干第一句话的那个新建公司,是自我比较,不是指题干最后出现的a record number of new company starting up,题干最后出现的仅指今年新公司。

简而言之:去年就业机会=previously established company + new company starting up(新1), 今年就业机会中previously established company 少了,只有新1不变或更少,才需要新增今年新公司(新2)才能打破去年记录。选项C中的两个new company 均指新1.

真罗嗦,供大家参考。 

偶也注意到这个问题,并在答题时受此困惑.其实这不是不同的理解,你只是把推理过程中的有些东东细化了,而前人在推理中(至少在贴子的表述中)把你说的"新公司概念"囊括进去了,作为当然的前提,如果大家对这个词的理解不同的话,不会得到相同的答案.这叫"英雄所见"

还是改写一下老托的那句名言吧"正确的都是相同的","不正确的各有各的错误"

哈哈,一笑而已,权当复习放松了

23#
发表于 2006-9-14 19:58:00 | 只看该作者

嗯,这种理解很重要,我绕了半天就是因为我觉得去年的new company今年就是旧的了。。。

24#
发表于 2006-10-3 18:06:00 | 只看该作者
我也是有同样的困惑,多谢brucejohnson,在我就要晕倒的时候把我救了起来
25#
发表于 2007-6-6 21:34:00 | 只看该作者
逻辑里有些题目(infer,assumption)其实就是数学+,-,x,/,看到题目,想到比较项两边是否相等,或寻找比较项之间内在关系排除他因,即可得出正确答案。
26#
发表于 2007-11-25 00:36:00 | 只看该作者
!lawyer在线!
27#
发表于 2008-5-10 19:02:00 | 只看该作者

这道题目我也选择了A,其实归跟到底是没有清楚原文的推理链.我发现GWD很多题目都是算术的加加减减,所以一定注意原文的所出现的关键因素和结论的的关系.

而切根据结论的特殊性,in a given  year, 也可以推测太general了

28#
发表于 2008-5-12 22:05:00 | 只看该作者

我觉得美国人数学没那么复杂

其实就是previously established companies+ new companies

如果还要去考虑去年的new companies成了今年的previously established companies似乎背离了ETS要考的初衷

29#
发表于 2008-6-5 09:39:00 | 只看该作者
ddddddddddddddd
30#
发表于 2008-12-4 16:46:00 | 只看该作者
brucejohnson让人豁然开朗
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-14 09:50
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部